Perceived motivators and barriers to research engagement for psychologists in an Australian public healthcare service: insights from the research capacity and culture survey.

Young-Eun C Lee, Christine Miller, Alexandra Ure
{"title":"Perceived motivators and barriers to research engagement for psychologists in an Australian public healthcare service: insights from the research capacity and culture survey.","authors":"Young-Eun C Lee, Christine Miller, Alexandra Ure","doi":"10.1071/AH25015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveBuilding capacity to embed research into care is central to improving healthcare delivery. Psychologists are well equipped and uniquely positioned to conduct clinical research given the significant research component of clinical training. Despite this, relatively little is known about how psychologists working in Australian public health rate their own skills and capacity for research at a team and organisational level.MethodsNinety-two psychologists working at Monash Health, Victoria, Australia completed the validated Research Capacity and Culture tool and answered questions relating to perceived barriers and motivators to research engagement in their clinical roles.ResultsWhile psychologists rated their own individual capacity to engage in research as high, they perceived the research skills and success of their clinical teams and the organisation as low to moderate. Inductive content analyses revealed constraints of clinical role, lack of system/infrastructure, and lack of organisational/team visibility as barriers to research engagement, whereas drive for clinical excellence, internal motivation and a positive team culture were highlighted as motivators.ConclusionsWe discuss the potential untapped resource of psychologists in Australian public health who are interested and skilled to engage in research but perceive challenges of a lack of research capacity and culture within their team and organisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH25015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveBuilding capacity to embed research into care is central to improving healthcare delivery. Psychologists are well equipped and uniquely positioned to conduct clinical research given the significant research component of clinical training. Despite this, relatively little is known about how psychologists working in Australian public health rate their own skills and capacity for research at a team and organisational level.MethodsNinety-two psychologists working at Monash Health, Victoria, Australia completed the validated Research Capacity and Culture tool and answered questions relating to perceived barriers and motivators to research engagement in their clinical roles.ResultsWhile psychologists rated their own individual capacity to engage in research as high, they perceived the research skills and success of their clinical teams and the organisation as low to moderate. Inductive content analyses revealed constraints of clinical role, lack of system/infrastructure, and lack of organisational/team visibility as barriers to research engagement, whereas drive for clinical excellence, internal motivation and a positive team culture were highlighted as motivators.ConclusionsWe discuss the potential untapped resource of psychologists in Australian public health who are interested and skilled to engage in research but perceive challenges of a lack of research capacity and culture within their team and organisation.

感知动机和障碍的研究参与心理学家在澳大利亚公共卫生服务:从研究能力和文化调查的见解。
建设将研究纳入护理的能力是改善医疗保健服务的核心。鉴于临床培训中重要的研究组成部分,心理学家在进行临床研究方面装备精良,地位独特。尽管如此,对于在澳大利亚公共卫生领域工作的心理学家如何在团队和组织层面评估自己的研究技能和能力,人们知之甚少。方法在澳大利亚维多利亚州莫纳什健康中心工作的92名心理学家完成了经过验证的研究能力和文化工具,并回答了与临床角色中研究参与的感知障碍和动机有关的问题。结果:虽然心理学家认为他们个人参与研究的能力很高,但他们认为他们的临床团队和组织的研究技能和成功程度低到中等。归纳性内容分析显示,临床角色的限制、缺乏系统/基础设施、缺乏组织/团队可见性是研究参与的障碍,而对临床卓越的追求、内部动机和积极的团队文化被强调为激励因素。结论:我们讨论了澳大利亚公共卫生心理学家潜在的未开发资源,他们有兴趣和技能从事研究,但认为他们的团队和组织缺乏研究能力和文化的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信