Association Between Adequacy and Moderation of Quality of Diet with Metabolic Syndrome Parameters Among Iranian Health Workers Based on the Baseline Data of Employees Health Cohort Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mohammad Hossein Sharifi, Elahe Mansouriyekta, Seyed Jalil Masoumi, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh, Zahra Rostami Ghotbabadi
{"title":"Association Between Adequacy and Moderation of Quality of Diet with Metabolic Syndrome Parameters Among Iranian Health Workers Based on the Baseline Data of Employees Health Cohort Study.","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Sharifi, Elahe Mansouriyekta, Seyed Jalil Masoumi, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh, Zahra Rostami Ghotbabadi","doi":"10.34172/aim.33193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A healthy diet is essential for managing metabolic syndrome (MetS), but moderation and dietary adequacy remain ambiguous.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the recruiting phase of the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Employees Health Cohort Study (SUMS EHCS) were utilized to conduct this cross-sectional analysis. A validated 168-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to collect dietary data in the Persian cohort. In the current study, the healthy eating index (HEI-2015) includes two components, namely adequacy and moderation which were used to evaluate the quality of the diet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 3380 health workers, with a mean age of 41.81±7 years and 55.2% female. Among them, 22.3% met the ATP III criteria for MetS. The mean total HEI, adequacy, and moderation scores were 63.89±9.53, 41.03±5.88, and 20.13±4.90, respectively. Adjusted model analysis showed no significant correlation between diet adequacy and MetS or its components, but found a significant association between diet moderation and MetS (OR: 1.03 [1.008-1.05]), abdominal obesity (OR: 1.02 [1.003-1.04]), elevated serum triglycerides (TGs) (OR: 1.02 [1-1.03]), and elevated fasting blood sugar (FBS) (OR: 1.03 [1.005-1.05]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that there was a significant correlation between diet moderation and abdominal obesity, elevated serum TGs, elevated FBS, and MetS. Future studies on the topic are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":55469,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Iranian Medicine","volume":"28 4","pages":"182-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Iranian Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/aim.33193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A healthy diet is essential for managing metabolic syndrome (MetS), but moderation and dietary adequacy remain ambiguous.

Methods: Data from the recruiting phase of the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Employees Health Cohort Study (SUMS EHCS) were utilized to conduct this cross-sectional analysis. A validated 168-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to collect dietary data in the Persian cohort. In the current study, the healthy eating index (HEI-2015) includes two components, namely adequacy and moderation which were used to evaluate the quality of the diet.

Results: The study included 3380 health workers, with a mean age of 41.81±7 years and 55.2% female. Among them, 22.3% met the ATP III criteria for MetS. The mean total HEI, adequacy, and moderation scores were 63.89±9.53, 41.03±5.88, and 20.13±4.90, respectively. Adjusted model analysis showed no significant correlation between diet adequacy and MetS or its components, but found a significant association between diet moderation and MetS (OR: 1.03 [1.008-1.05]), abdominal obesity (OR: 1.02 [1.003-1.04]), elevated serum triglycerides (TGs) (OR: 1.02 [1-1.03]), and elevated fasting blood sugar (FBS) (OR: 1.03 [1.005-1.05]).

Conclusion: This study found that there was a significant correlation between diet moderation and abdominal obesity, elevated serum TGs, elevated FBS, and MetS. Future studies on the topic are recommended.

基于员工健康队列研究基线数据的伊朗卫生工作者饮食质量充分性和适度性与代谢综合征参数之间的关系
背景:健康的饮食是控制代谢综合征(MetS)的必要条件,但适度和饮食充足性仍然不明确。方法:采用设拉子医科大学员工健康队列研究(sum EHCS)招募阶段的数据进行横断面分析。一份经过验证的168项半定量食物频率问卷(FFQ)用于收集波斯队列的饮食数据。在本研究中,健康饮食指数(HEI-2015)包括两个组成部分,即充足性和适度性,用于评估饮食质量。结果:共纳入卫生工作者3380人,平均年龄41.81±7岁,女性55.2%。其中,22.3%的患者符合ATP III标准。平均HEI总分为63.89±9.53分,充分性评分为41.03±5.88分,适度评分为20.13±4.90分。调整后的模型分析显示,饮食充足性与MetS或其组成部分之间没有显著相关性,但发现饮食适度与MetS (or: 1.03[1.008-1.05])、腹部肥胖(or: 1.02[1.003-1.04])、血清甘油三酯(tg)升高(or: 1.02[1-1.03])和空腹血糖(FBS)升高(or: 1.03[1.005-1.05])之间存在显著相关性。结论:本研究发现饮食适度与腹部肥胖、血清tg升高、FBS升高和MetS之间存在显著相关性。建议对该主题进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Iranian Medicine
Archives of Iranian Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Aim and Scope: The Archives of Iranian Medicine (AIM) is a monthly peer-reviewed multidisciplinary medical publication. The journal welcomes contributions particularly relevant to the Middle-East region and publishes biomedical experiences and clinical investigations on prevalent diseases in the region as well as analyses of factors that may modulate the incidence, course, and management of diseases and pertinent medical problems. Manuscripts with didactic orientation and subjects exclusively of local interest will not be considered for publication.The 2016 Impact Factor of "Archives of Iranian Medicine" is 1.20.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信