Vibrationally excited molecule-metal surface reactions in heterogeneous and plasma catalysis: going beyond the Fridman-Macheret α model.

EES catalysis Pub Date : 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1039/d5ey00062a
Nick Gerrits, Annemie Bogaerts
{"title":"Vibrationally excited molecule-metal surface reactions in heterogeneous and plasma catalysis: going beyond the Fridman-Macheret <i>α</i> model.","authors":"Nick Gerrits, Annemie Bogaerts","doi":"10.1039/d5ey00062a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vibrational excitation of reactants plays an important role in heterogeneous and plasma catalysis by increasing the reactivity of various rate-controlling steps. Therefore, state-of-the-art microkinetic models attempt to include this effect by modelling the change in reaction rate with the Fridman-Macheret <i>α</i> approach. Although this approach is ubiquitous in simulations of plasma catalysis, it is not well established how accurate it is. In this work, we evaluate the Fridman-Macheret <i>α</i> approach by comparing it to vibrational efficacies obtained with molecular dynamics simulations. Unfortunately, the agreement is extremely poor (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = -0.35), raising questions about the suitability of using this method in describing vibrationally excited dissociative chemisorption on metal surfaces, as is currently the norm in plasma catalysis. Furthermore, the approach lacks vibrational mode specificity. Instead, we propose an alternative model at comparable computational cost, which is fitted to theoretical vibrational efficacies obtained with molecular dynamics. Our model uses (1) the barrier height to dissociative chemisorption, (2) an indication of how \"late\" the barrier is, and (3) the overlap of vibrational modes and the reaction coordinate at the barrier. These three features lead to a considerable qualitative and quantitative (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.52) improvement over the Fridman-Macheret <i>α</i> approach. Therefore, we advise to make use of our new model, since it can be readily plugged into existing microkinetic models for heterogeneous and plasma catalysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":72877,"journal":{"name":"EES catalysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EES catalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ey00062a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vibrational excitation of reactants plays an important role in heterogeneous and plasma catalysis by increasing the reactivity of various rate-controlling steps. Therefore, state-of-the-art microkinetic models attempt to include this effect by modelling the change in reaction rate with the Fridman-Macheret α approach. Although this approach is ubiquitous in simulations of plasma catalysis, it is not well established how accurate it is. In this work, we evaluate the Fridman-Macheret α approach by comparing it to vibrational efficacies obtained with molecular dynamics simulations. Unfortunately, the agreement is extremely poor (R 2 = -0.35), raising questions about the suitability of using this method in describing vibrationally excited dissociative chemisorption on metal surfaces, as is currently the norm in plasma catalysis. Furthermore, the approach lacks vibrational mode specificity. Instead, we propose an alternative model at comparable computational cost, which is fitted to theoretical vibrational efficacies obtained with molecular dynamics. Our model uses (1) the barrier height to dissociative chemisorption, (2) an indication of how "late" the barrier is, and (3) the overlap of vibrational modes and the reaction coordinate at the barrier. These three features lead to a considerable qualitative and quantitative (R 2 = 0.52) improvement over the Fridman-Macheret α approach. Therefore, we advise to make use of our new model, since it can be readily plugged into existing microkinetic models for heterogeneous and plasma catalysis.

非均相和等离子体催化中振动激发的分子-金属表面反应:超越Fridman-Macheret α模型。
反应物的振动激发在多相催化和等离子体催化中起着重要的作用,它提高了各种速率控制步骤的反应活性。因此,最先进的微动力学模型试图通过用friedman - macheret α方法模拟反应速率的变化来包括这种效应。尽管这种方法在等离子体催化模拟中无处不在,但它的准确性还没有很好地确定。在这项工作中,我们通过将Fridman-Macheret α方法与分子动力学模拟获得的振动效率进行比较来评估Fridman-Macheret α方法。不幸的是,一致性非常差(r2 = -0.35),这引起了人们对使用该方法描述金属表面振动激发解离化学吸附的适用性的质疑,因为目前等离子体催化是常态。此外,该方法缺乏振动模式特异性。相反,我们提出了一个计算成本相当的替代模型,该模型适合于用分子动力学获得的理论振动效率。我们的模型使用(1)解离化学吸附的势垒高度,(2)表明势垒的“晚期”,以及(3)振动模式的重叠和势垒处的反应坐标。与friedman - macheret α方法相比,这三个特征导致了相当大的定性和定量改进(r2 = 0.52)。因此,我们建议使用我们的新模型,因为它可以很容易地插入到现有的多相和等离子体催化微动力学模型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信