Care provided by humanoid robots: a scoping review.

IF 1.3 Q3 NURSING
Lailla Ketly Ferreira Tiradentes Ruiz, Tatiana da Silva Melo Malaquias, Geraldo Bezerra da Silva Junior, Isabel Cristina Kowal Olm Cunha, Rosangela Aparecida Pimenta, Patrícia Aroni Dadalt, Maria do Carmo Fernandez Lourenço Haddad
{"title":"Care provided by humanoid robots: a scoping review.","authors":"Lailla Ketly Ferreira Tiradentes Ruiz, Tatiana da Silva Melo Malaquias, Geraldo Bezerra da Silva Junior, Isabel Cristina Kowal Olm Cunha, Rosangela Aparecida Pimenta, Patrícia Aroni Dadalt, Maria do Carmo Fernandez Lourenço Haddad","doi":"10.17533/udea.iee.v43n1e11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the evidence in the literature regarding the care provided to the population by humanoid robots.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review based on the guidelines established by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) checklist was followed. The review protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework under the number osf.io/6ur93. The search was conducted in November 2023 in the following databases: PubMed®, EMBASE®, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus®, and CINAHL, as well as in the gray literature, including Google Scholar and the Catalog of Theses and Dissertations of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), using the search strategy: \"humanoid robot*\" AND \"patient*\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 articles were analyzed. Most of the identified studies were conducted in hospital settings (n=13), with a primary focus on adults (n=10) and children (n=8). The countries with the highest number of publications were Japan (n=6), Canada (n=5), and France (n=4). Three areas of care were identified: social interaction (n=17), physical rehabilitation (n=7), and dissemination of health information (n=3). Additionally, only four studies involved collaboration between humanoid robots and healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the increasing use of humanoid robots in healthcare, it remains essential to enhance their integration with professionals in the field. Social interaction highlighted the need to improve patient care, underscoring the importance of aligning the capabilities of these robots with the expertise of healthcare providers. Accordingly, future research should focus on developing strategies that ensure this technology not only assists but also optimizes the quality of care and strengthens interdisciplinary collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":53477,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v43n1e11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify the evidence in the literature regarding the care provided to the population by humanoid robots.

Methods: A scoping review based on the guidelines established by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) checklist was followed. The review protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework under the number osf.io/6ur93. The search was conducted in November 2023 in the following databases: PubMed®, EMBASE®, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus®, and CINAHL, as well as in the gray literature, including Google Scholar and the Catalog of Theses and Dissertations of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), using the search strategy: "humanoid robot*" AND "patient*".

Results: A total of 27 articles were analyzed. Most of the identified studies were conducted in hospital settings (n=13), with a primary focus on adults (n=10) and children (n=8). The countries with the highest number of publications were Japan (n=6), Canada (n=5), and France (n=4). Three areas of care were identified: social interaction (n=17), physical rehabilitation (n=7), and dissemination of health information (n=3). Additionally, only four studies involved collaboration between humanoid robots and healthcare providers.

Conclusion: Despite the increasing use of humanoid robots in healthcare, it remains essential to enhance their integration with professionals in the field. Social interaction highlighted the need to improve patient care, underscoring the importance of aligning the capabilities of these robots with the expertise of healthcare providers. Accordingly, future research should focus on developing strategies that ensure this technology not only assists but also optimizes the quality of care and strengthens interdisciplinary collaboration.

人形机器人提供的护理:范围综述。
目的:识别文献中关于人形机器人为人群提供护理的证据。方法:根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所制定的指南进行范围审查。遵循范围审查首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)清单。审查方案已在开放科学框架上注册,编号为osf.io/6ur93。检索于2023年11月在PubMed®、EMBASE®、LILACS、Web of Science、Scopus®和CINAHL数据库以及谷歌Scholar和The Coordination for The Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)论文目录等灰色文献中进行,检索策略为:“humanoid robot*”和“patient*”。结果:共分析了27篇文献。大多数确定的研究是在医院环境中进行的(n=13),主要关注成人(n=10)和儿童(n=8)。发表论文最多的国家是日本(n=6)、加拿大(n=5)和法国(n=4)。确定了三个护理领域:社会互动(n=17)、身体康复(n=7)和健康信息传播(n=3)。此外,只有四项研究涉及人形机器人和医疗保健提供者之间的合作。结论:尽管人形机器人在医疗保健中的应用越来越多,但加强其与该领域专业人员的整合仍然至关重要。社会互动强调了改善患者护理的必要性,强调了将这些机器人的能力与医疗保健提供者的专业知识相结合的重要性。因此,未来的研究应侧重于制定策略,以确保该技术不仅有助于而且优化护理质量并加强跨学科合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria
Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the journal of Nursing and Education is to present scientific and technical information about health, illnesses and related topics. The journal serves as the conduit [medium] through which the experiences of our own nursing and social science departments can be shared within Columbia and internationally. It is written primarily for nurses, general health practitioners and other related disciplines but can also be used by students and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信