Guidelines Against Discrimination and Bias in Anatomical Research Papers (GDBARP): Recommendations From Anatomical Journal Editors

IF 2.3 4区医学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY

Clinical Anatomy Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI:10.1002/ca.24293

Joe Iwanaga, Sén Takeda, Jerzy A. Walocha, Domenico Ribatti, Mariano del Sol, Kumar Satish Ravi, Janusz Moryś, Friedrich Paulsen, Vishram Singh, Nihal Apaydin, Hee-Jin Kim, Philip Adds, Fabrice Duparc, Marios Loukas, R. Shane Tubbs

{"title":"Guidelines Against Discrimination and Bias in Anatomical Research Papers (GDBARP): Recommendations From Anatomical Journal Editors","authors":"Joe Iwanaga, Sén Takeda, Jerzy A. Walocha, Domenico Ribatti, Mariano del Sol, Kumar Satish Ravi, Janusz Moryś, Friedrich Paulsen, Vishram Singh, Nihal Apaydin, Hee-Jin Kim, Philip Adds, Fabrice Duparc, Marios Loukas, R. Shane Tubbs","doi":"10.1002/ca.24293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Most discussions about discrimination and bias in anatomical research papers have been limited to terminology relating to race/ethnicity and gender/sex. However, as editors of anatomical journals, the authors of this article have frequently observed broader instances of potential discrimination and bias within anatomical research. These often stem from differences among authors' backgrounds, traditions, cultures, religions, provenance/origins, and workplace affiliations. In view of the limited discourse on this topic, we seek in this article to establish a consensus among editors of anatomical journals and to propose new Guidelines Against Discrimination and Bias in Anatomical Research Papers (GDBARP). We have identified multiple factors that can contribute to discrimination and bias, underscoring the need for greater awareness and proactive measures. It is imperative in anatomical research to respect authors, reviewers, and editors regardless of their background, culture, traditions, sex, ethnicity, language, religion, or ethical perspectives.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":"38 5","pages":"613-618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ca.24293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most discussions about discrimination and bias in anatomical research papers have been limited to terminology relating to race/ethnicity and gender/sex. However, as editors of anatomical journals, the authors of this article have frequently observed broader instances of potential discrimination and bias within anatomical research. These often stem from differences among authors' backgrounds, traditions, cultures, religions, provenance/origins, and workplace affiliations. In view of the limited discourse on this topic, we seek in this article to establish a consensus among editors of anatomical journals and to propose new Guidelines Against Discrimination and Bias in Anatomical Research Papers (GDBARP). We have identified multiple factors that can contribute to discrimination and bias, underscoring the need for greater awareness and proactive measures. It is imperative in anatomical research to respect authors, reviewers, and editors regardless of their background, culture, traditions, sex, ethnicity, language, religion, or ethical perspectives.

查看原文本刊更多论文

反对解剖学研究论文中的歧视和偏见指南（GDBARP）：解剖学期刊编辑的建议。

解剖学研究论文中关于歧视和偏见的大多数讨论都局限于与种族/民族和性别/性别相关的术语。然而，作为解剖学期刊的编辑，本文的作者经常观察到解剖学研究中潜在的歧视和偏见的更广泛的实例。这通常源于作者的背景、传统、文化、宗教、出处/起源和工作场所的不同。鉴于对这一主题的讨论有限，我们在本文中寻求在解剖学期刊的编辑之间建立共识，并提出新的解剖学研究论文中反对歧视和偏见的指南（GDBARP）。我们已经确定了可能导致歧视和偏见的多种因素，强调需要提高认识并采取积极措施。在解剖学研究中，尊重作者、审稿人和编辑是必要的，无论他们的背景、文化、传统、性别、种族、语言、宗教或伦理观点如何。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Anatomy 医学-解剖学与形态学

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

12.50%

发文量

154

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： Clinical Anatomy is the Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists. The goal of Clinical Anatomy is to provide a medium for the exchange of current information between anatomists and clinicians. This journal embraces anatomy in all its aspects as applied to medical practice. Furthermore, the journal assists physicians and other health care providers in keeping abreast of new methodologies for patient management and informs educators of new developments in clinical anatomy and teaching techniques. Clinical Anatomy publishes original and review articles of scientific, clinical, and educational interest. Papers covering the application of anatomic principles to the solution of clinical problems and/or the application of clinical observations to expand anatomic knowledge are welcomed.