Group physical therapy improves outcomes for patients on an inpatient psychiatric pain service.

IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kalen Pascal, Ryan Roemmich, Bingqing Ye, Kelly Daley, Glenn Treisman, Annette Lavezza, Rachel Reoli
{"title":"Group physical therapy improves outcomes for patients on an inpatient psychiatric pain service.","authors":"Kalen Pascal, Ryan Roemmich, Bingqing Ye, Kelly Daley, Glenn Treisman, Annette Lavezza, Rachel Reoli","doi":"10.1177/20494637251343553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While physical therapists have provided group physical therapy interventions for patients admitted to inpatient psychiatric pain service lines, to date, it has not been assessed whether the patients' outcomes of pain and function have improved during their stay. Thus, our aim is to evaluate how group physical therapy, as part of an inpatient psychiatric rehabilitation team, impacts outcomes for patients receiving chronic pain treatment services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was retrospectively retrieved from patients who received group physical therapy during their inpatient psychiatric pain admission. At evaluation and discharge, PROMIS Pain Interference Scale tracked pain, while AM-PAC Basic Mobility Outpatient Short Form measured functional mobility. Paired samples statistics were used to evaluate outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 6-month period, 25 patients (average age 40.28 +/- 15.93 years) received group physical therapy. All patients had the treatment diagnosis of chronic pain. The null hypothesis, that there was no difference between evaluation and discharge scores, was rejected for both the PROMIS Pain Interference Scale <i>t</i> (25) = 3.82, two-tailed <i>p</i> < .001 and the AM-PAC Mobility Score <i>t</i> (25) = -2.24, two-tailed <i>p</i> = .03.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Group physical therapy, as part of an inpatient psychiatric pain management team, assists with improving patient outcomes of pain and mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637251343553"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637251343553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While physical therapists have provided group physical therapy interventions for patients admitted to inpatient psychiatric pain service lines, to date, it has not been assessed whether the patients' outcomes of pain and function have improved during their stay. Thus, our aim is to evaluate how group physical therapy, as part of an inpatient psychiatric rehabilitation team, impacts outcomes for patients receiving chronic pain treatment services.

Methods: Data was retrospectively retrieved from patients who received group physical therapy during their inpatient psychiatric pain admission. At evaluation and discharge, PROMIS Pain Interference Scale tracked pain, while AM-PAC Basic Mobility Outpatient Short Form measured functional mobility. Paired samples statistics were used to evaluate outcomes.

Results: Over a 6-month period, 25 patients (average age 40.28 +/- 15.93 years) received group physical therapy. All patients had the treatment diagnosis of chronic pain. The null hypothesis, that there was no difference between evaluation and discharge scores, was rejected for both the PROMIS Pain Interference Scale t (25) = 3.82, two-tailed p < .001 and the AM-PAC Mobility Score t (25) = -2.24, two-tailed p = .03.

Conclusions: Group physical therapy, as part of an inpatient psychiatric pain management team, assists with improving patient outcomes of pain and mobility.

团体物理治疗改善了住院精神疼痛服务患者的预后。
背景:虽然物理治疗师已经为住院精神疼痛服务热线的患者提供了团体物理治疗干预,但迄今为止,尚未评估患者在住院期间疼痛和功能的结局是否得到改善。因此,我们的目的是评估团体物理治疗,作为住院精神康复团队的一部分,如何影响接受慢性疼痛治疗服务的患者的结果。方法:回顾性分析在精神疼痛住院期间接受集体物理治疗的患者的资料。在评估和出院时,PROMIS疼痛干扰量表追踪疼痛,而AM-PAC基本活动能力门诊短表测量功能活动能力。采用配对样本统计方法评价结果。结果:在6个月的时间里,25例患者(平均年龄40.28 +/- 15.93岁)接受了团体物理治疗。所有患者的治疗诊断均为慢性疼痛。PROMIS疼痛干扰量表t(25) = 3.82,双尾p < .001, AM-PAC活动能力评分t(25) = -2.24,双尾p = .03,否定了评估和出院评分无差异的原假设。结论:团体物理治疗作为住院精神疼痛管理团队的一部分,有助于改善患者的疼痛和活动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Pain
British Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信