Clinical utility of digital pain drawings captured by people living with musculoskeletal pain conditions: a qualitative study.

IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Syed Mustafa Ali, Salma Elsayed, Rebecca R Lee, Jill Firth, David McCarthy, William G Dixon, Sabine N van der Veer
{"title":"Clinical utility of digital pain drawings captured by people living with musculoskeletal pain conditions: a qualitative study.","authors":"Syed Mustafa Ali, Salma Elsayed, Rebecca R Lee, Jill Firth, David McCarthy, William G Dixon, Sabine N van der Veer","doi":"10.1177/20494637251343227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital pain drawings are an emerging method for pain assessment, but it is still unclear how these could best support pain treatment and management decisions. Therefore, this study explored the potential clinical utility of digital pain drawings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a narrative study, involving qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals providing pain management services to people living with musculoskeletal pain conditions working across different disciplines and care levels in the healthcare system of the United Kingdom. We transcribed interviews, conducted thematic content analysis to identify themes and presented results using a framework approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed three general practitioners, five rheumatology healthcare professionals, four physiotherapists, two pain consultants and one rheumatology nurse. We identified four themes describing current pain assessment practices, potential advantages of digital pain drawings either alone or in combination with other pain information (e.g. perceived pain triggers and relieving factors) and outcome measures (e.g. quality of sleep, function and anxiety). Digital pain drawings provide an opportunity of enriching patient-provider communication, particularly for people with language barriers. Digital pain drawings may also support healthcare professionals across different disciplines and care levels (e.g. primary and secondary care) in decisions related to referrals, differential diagnosis, treatment planning, evaluating response to treatment and scheduling follow-up visits when combining pain drawings with other pain information, such as pain consequences and perceived causes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital pain drawings are clinically useful because of their potential to guide diagnosis, treatment and management choices in managing musculoskeletal chronic pain. Future research should investigate how these potential benefits are achieved by integrating digital pain drawings in clinical practice across different disciplines and care levels in the UK's healthcare system and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637251343227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637251343227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital pain drawings are an emerging method for pain assessment, but it is still unclear how these could best support pain treatment and management decisions. Therefore, this study explored the potential clinical utility of digital pain drawings.

Methods: We conducted a narrative study, involving qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals providing pain management services to people living with musculoskeletal pain conditions working across different disciplines and care levels in the healthcare system of the United Kingdom. We transcribed interviews, conducted thematic content analysis to identify themes and presented results using a framework approach.

Results: We interviewed three general practitioners, five rheumatology healthcare professionals, four physiotherapists, two pain consultants and one rheumatology nurse. We identified four themes describing current pain assessment practices, potential advantages of digital pain drawings either alone or in combination with other pain information (e.g. perceived pain triggers and relieving factors) and outcome measures (e.g. quality of sleep, function and anxiety). Digital pain drawings provide an opportunity of enriching patient-provider communication, particularly for people with language barriers. Digital pain drawings may also support healthcare professionals across different disciplines and care levels (e.g. primary and secondary care) in decisions related to referrals, differential diagnosis, treatment planning, evaluating response to treatment and scheduling follow-up visits when combining pain drawings with other pain information, such as pain consequences and perceived causes.

Conclusion: Digital pain drawings are clinically useful because of their potential to guide diagnosis, treatment and management choices in managing musculoskeletal chronic pain. Future research should investigate how these potential benefits are achieved by integrating digital pain drawings in clinical practice across different disciplines and care levels in the UK's healthcare system and beyond.

临床应用的数字疼痛图纸捕获的人生活与肌肉骨骼疼痛条件:定性研究。
背景:数字疼痛图是一种新兴的疼痛评估方法,但目前尚不清楚这些方法如何能最好地支持疼痛治疗和管理决策。因此,本研究探讨了数字疼痛图的潜在临床应用。方法:我们进行了一项叙述性研究,包括对英国医疗保健系统中不同学科和护理水平的医疗保健专业人员进行定性访谈,这些专业人员为患有肌肉骨骼疼痛的患者提供疼痛管理服务。我们记录访谈,进行专题内容分析以确定主题,并使用框架方法呈现结果。结果:我们采访了3名全科医生、5名风湿病保健专业人员、4名物理治疗师、2名疼痛咨询师和1名风湿病护士。我们确定了四个主题,描述了当前的疼痛评估实践,数字疼痛图单独或与其他疼痛信息(如感知疼痛触发因素和缓解因素)和结果测量(如睡眠质量,功能和焦虑)的潜在优势。数字疼痛图提供了丰富医患沟通的机会,特别是对于有语言障碍的人。当将疼痛图与其他疼痛信息(如疼痛后果和感知原因)相结合时,数字疼痛图还可以支持不同学科和护理水平(例如初级和二级护理)的医疗保健专业人员做出与转诊、鉴别诊断、治疗计划、评估治疗反应和安排随访有关的决策。结论:数字疼痛图在指导肌肉骨骼慢性疼痛的诊断、治疗和管理选择方面具有临床应用价值。未来的研究应该调查如何通过在临床实践中整合英国医疗保健系统和其他不同学科和护理水平的数字疼痛图来实现这些潜在的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Pain
British Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信