Effect of interventions on surgical site infections in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Fekadeselassie Berhe, Tefera Belachew, Kalkidan Hassen
{"title":"Effect of interventions on surgical site infections in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.","authors":"Fekadeselassie Berhe, Tefera Belachew, Kalkidan Hassen","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02946-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infections (SSI) are a major concern due to their contributions to morbidity, economic loss, and death among individuals who underwent operations in healthcare institutions. To decrease this infection, various pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions have been devised and implemented for major surgery patients. Pharmacological interventions include the provision of antibiotic prophylaxis and antiseptic agents, whereas non-pharmacological interventions encompass programmatic interventions such as protocols, policies, quality improvement initiatives, training, and education that are given at the institutional level. However, the effect of particularly non-pharmacological interventions on the reduction has not been comprehensively evaluated for over a decade. This systematic review attempts to synthesize a piece of evidence on the effect of non-pharmacological intervention in Sub-Saharan Africa on minimizing SSI and enhancing health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, AJOL, Hinari, search platforms, and open-access repositories were accessed. Two investigators conducted a literature selection process, and the quality of selected articles was assessed using a JBI quality evaluation checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Three main intervention categories were identified, which focused on improving adherence to protocol, policy change or induction, and delivery of multimodal strategies. These interventions led to a reduction in SSI rates in varying degrees (15% to 95%). Multimodal interventions are the most widely implemented and comprehensive approaches that integrate multiple evidence-based practices, which have demonstrated a substantial reduction of SSI in different surgical populations. The rates of improvement with these interventions were influenced by intervention type, patient characteristics, surgical urgency, healthcare setting, follow-up time, and criteria for measuring the outcomes that may influence the SSI rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interventions focusing on policy, protocol, and multimodal strategies can effectively reduce SSI rates, with the latter being the most effective. Patient and clinical characteristics, along with the healthcare setting, were influential factors affecting the interventions' impact on SSI. This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO, in the number CRD42024524963.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12087041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02946-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) are a major concern due to their contributions to morbidity, economic loss, and death among individuals who underwent operations in healthcare institutions. To decrease this infection, various pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions have been devised and implemented for major surgery patients. Pharmacological interventions include the provision of antibiotic prophylaxis and antiseptic agents, whereas non-pharmacological interventions encompass programmatic interventions such as protocols, policies, quality improvement initiatives, training, and education that are given at the institutional level. However, the effect of particularly non-pharmacological interventions on the reduction has not been comprehensively evaluated for over a decade. This systematic review attempts to synthesize a piece of evidence on the effect of non-pharmacological intervention in Sub-Saharan Africa on minimizing SSI and enhancing health outcomes.

Methods: Databases including MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, AJOL, Hinari, search platforms, and open-access repositories were accessed. Two investigators conducted a literature selection process, and the quality of selected articles was assessed using a JBI quality evaluation checklist.

Results: A total of 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Three main intervention categories were identified, which focused on improving adherence to protocol, policy change or induction, and delivery of multimodal strategies. These interventions led to a reduction in SSI rates in varying degrees (15% to 95%). Multimodal interventions are the most widely implemented and comprehensive approaches that integrate multiple evidence-based practices, which have demonstrated a substantial reduction of SSI in different surgical populations. The rates of improvement with these interventions were influenced by intervention type, patient characteristics, surgical urgency, healthcare setting, follow-up time, and criteria for measuring the outcomes that may influence the SSI rates.

Conclusion: Interventions focusing on policy, protocol, and multimodal strategies can effectively reduce SSI rates, with the latter being the most effective. Patient and clinical characteristics, along with the healthcare setting, were influential factors affecting the interventions' impact on SSI. This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO, in the number CRD42024524963.

干预措施对撒哈拉以南非洲手术部位感染的影响:一项系统综述。
背景:手术部位感染(SSI)是一个主要的问题,因为它对在医疗机构接受手术的个体的发病率、经济损失和死亡有很大的影响。为了减少这种感染,各种药理学和非药理学干预措施已经设计并实施了大手术患者。药理学干预包括提供抗生素预防和抗菌剂,而非药理学干预包括方案、政策、质量改进倡议、培训和教育等在机构层面进行的计划性干预。然而,十多年来,特别是非药物干预对减少的影响尚未得到全面评估。本系统综述试图综合撒哈拉以南非洲地区非药物干预对减少SSI和提高健康结果的影响的证据。方法:检索MEDLINE、谷歌Scholar、Cochrane Library、AJOL、Hinari、检索平台、开放存取库等数据库。两名研究者进行了文献选择过程,并使用JBI质量评估清单评估所选文章的质量。结果:共分析了11项符合纳入标准的研究。确定了三个主要干预类别,其重点是改善对协议的遵守,政策改变或诱导,以及提供多模式战略。这些干预措施不同程度地降低了SSI发生率(15%至95%)。多模式干预是最广泛实施和综合的方法,整合了多种循证实践,已证明在不同手术人群中可显著减少SSI。这些干预措施的改善率受干预类型、患者特征、手术紧急程度、医疗环境、随访时间和可能影响SSI率的测量结果标准的影响。结论:以政策、方案和多模式策略为重点的干预措施可以有效降低SSI发生率,其中后者最有效。患者和临床特征以及医疗环境是影响干预措施对SSI影响的影响因素。本系统综述已在PROSPERO注册,编号为CRD42024524963。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信