Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Quality of Life and Mental Health in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 0.7 Q3 Medicine
Catarina Gonçalves, Armando Raimundo, Ana Abreu, João Pais, Jorge Bravo
{"title":"Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Quality of Life and Mental Health in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Catarina Gonçalves, Armando Raimundo, Ana Abreu, João Pais, Jorge Bravo","doi":"10.1159/000545049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effects of two exercise-based programs over a short-term 6-week period, compared to a control group (no exercise program), on the quality of life (QoL) and mental health of patients with myocardial infarction (MI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, 72 patients with MI were individually randomized (1:1:1) into three groups: HIIT, MICT, and control. Both training programs consisted of 6 weeks of supervised treadmill exercise, three sessions per week. MICT was performed at ≈70-75% of peak heart rate (HR), while HIIT was performed at ≈85-95% of HRpeak. The control group followed standard medical recommendations. Outcome measures included assessments of QoL (SF-36) and anxiety and depression (HADS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the exercise groups, 6 out of the 8 SF-36 dimensions showed a significant improvement after 6 weeks. The HIIT group exhibited noteworthy enhancements in physical functioning (<i>p</i> = 0.022) and general health dimensions (<i>p</i> = 0.015) compared to the MICT group. Baseline anxiety and depression scores, albeit modestly elevated, substantially decreased following the 6-week exercise interventions in both exercise groups, exhibiting statistical significance compared to the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the HIIT and MICT in terms of mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both exercise programs were equally effective in improving QoL and mental health in MI patients. However, the HIIT group showed greater improvements in physical functioning and general health dimensions than the MICT group. Our findings emphasize that abstaining from exercise-based post-MI programs correlates with lower QoL, and higher anxiety and depression scores. This underscores the significance of implementing exercise-based rehabilitation strategies to optimize the recovery and well-being of patients with MI.</p>","PeriodicalId":37244,"journal":{"name":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the effects of two exercise-based programs over a short-term 6-week period, compared to a control group (no exercise program), on the quality of life (QoL) and mental health of patients with myocardial infarction (MI).

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 72 patients with MI were individually randomized (1:1:1) into three groups: HIIT, MICT, and control. Both training programs consisted of 6 weeks of supervised treadmill exercise, three sessions per week. MICT was performed at ≈70-75% of peak heart rate (HR), while HIIT was performed at ≈85-95% of HRpeak. The control group followed standard medical recommendations. Outcome measures included assessments of QoL (SF-36) and anxiety and depression (HADS).

Results: In the exercise groups, 6 out of the 8 SF-36 dimensions showed a significant improvement after 6 weeks. The HIIT group exhibited noteworthy enhancements in physical functioning (p = 0.022) and general health dimensions (p = 0.015) compared to the MICT group. Baseline anxiety and depression scores, albeit modestly elevated, substantially decreased following the 6-week exercise interventions in both exercise groups, exhibiting statistical significance compared to the control group (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the HIIT and MICT in terms of mental health.

Conclusion: Both exercise programs were equally effective in improving QoL and mental health in MI patients. However, the HIIT group showed greater improvements in physical functioning and general health dimensions than the MICT group. Our findings emphasize that abstaining from exercise-based post-MI programs correlates with lower QoL, and higher anxiety and depression scores. This underscores the significance of implementing exercise-based rehabilitation strategies to optimize the recovery and well-being of patients with MI.

高强度间歇训练与中强度连续训练对心肌梗死后患者生活质量和心理健康的影响:一项随机对照试验
本研究旨在探讨两种基于运动的方案在短期6周内对心肌梗死(MI)患者的生活质量(QoL)和心理健康的影响,并与对照组(无运动方案)进行比较。方法:在这项随机对照试验中,72例心肌梗死患者被随机分为三组:HIIT组、MICT组和对照组。两个训练项目都包括6周的有监督的跑步机锻炼,每周三次。MICT在峰值心率(HR)≈70-75%时进行,HIIT在峰值心率(HR)≈85-95%时进行。对照组遵循标准的医疗建议。结果测量包括生活质量(SF-36)和焦虑和抑郁(HADS)的评估。结果:在运动组中,6周后,8个SF-36维度中有6个维度有显著改善。与MICT组相比,HIIT组在身体功能(p = 0.022)和一般健康维度(p = 0.015)方面表现出显著的增强。在6周的运动干预后,两个运动组的基线焦虑和抑郁评分虽然略有升高,但明显下降,与对照组相比具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。HIIT组和MICT组在心理健康方面没有发现显著差异。结论:两种运动方案在改善心梗患者的生活质量和心理健康方面效果相同。然而,与MICT组相比,HIIT组在身体功能和一般健康方面表现出更大的改善。我们的研究结果强调,放弃基于运动的心肌梗死后计划与较低的生活质量、较高的焦虑和抑郁评分相关。这强调了实施以运动为基础的康复策略以优化心肌梗死患者的恢复和福祉的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Portuguese Journal of Public Health
Portuguese Journal of Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
55 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信