Medical Students' Insight into Foundation Training (MEDSIFT): a National Cross-Sectional Online Survey reveals close to 50% are considering a career outside the NHS.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Benjamin Cook, Edelyne Tandanu, Umar Rehman, Elena Whiteman, Temidayo Osunronbi, Ghazel Mukhtar, Garikai Kungwengwe, Mohammad Sohaib Sarwar, Sammy Arab, Karanjot Chhatwal, Ricky Ellis, Karl Romain, Akib Khan, Ahmed Ezzat, Justin Wormald, George Adigbli, Manaf Khatib, Simon Filson, Naveen Cavale, Peter A Brennan
{"title":"Medical Students' Insight into Foundation Training (MEDSIFT): a National Cross-Sectional Online Survey reveals close to 50% are considering a career outside the NHS.","authors":"Benjamin Cook, Edelyne Tandanu, Umar Rehman, Elena Whiteman, Temidayo Osunronbi, Ghazel Mukhtar, Garikai Kungwengwe, Mohammad Sohaib Sarwar, Sammy Arab, Karanjot Chhatwal, Ricky Ellis, Karl Romain, Akib Khan, Ahmed Ezzat, Justin Wormald, George Adigbli, Manaf Khatib, Simon Filson, Naveen Cavale, Peter A Brennan","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgaf071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The new preference-informed allocation (PIA) system introduced for the 2024 UK cohort Foundation Programme (UKFPO) marks a shift away from the traditional meritocratic 'ranking' used in previous years. Instead of appointment to Foundation Programme places, PIA is a computer-generated allocation and deanery preferencing system. This change has raised numerous concerns among both students and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the opinions of medical students on the new UKFPO PIA system.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>An online questionnaire was distributed to medical students graduating in 2024, 2025, or 2026 across the UK.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2297 responses were collected and 2288 were included in the study. Overall, 51.6% (n = 1183) of respondents felt the PIA system was unfair, 76.3% (n = 1746) felt they had lost control of their application, and 46.3% (n = 1049) had noticed a negative effect on their physical or mental health. Notably, 48.2% (n = 1094) of students who responded are now considering a career outside the National Health Service (NHS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the PIA system falls short of students' expectations and has led to record numbers of students considering careers outside the NHS. Further changes to this system are needed and should aim to address fairness and equity while rewarding students for their hard work. According to these data, the PIA system risks further deteriorating workforce morale and attrition rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The new preference-informed allocation (PIA) system introduced for the 2024 UK cohort Foundation Programme (UKFPO) marks a shift away from the traditional meritocratic 'ranking' used in previous years. Instead of appointment to Foundation Programme places, PIA is a computer-generated allocation and deanery preferencing system. This change has raised numerous concerns among both students and clinicians.

Aims: To investigate the opinions of medical students on the new UKFPO PIA system.

Methodology: An online questionnaire was distributed to medical students graduating in 2024, 2025, or 2026 across the UK.

Results: In total, 2297 responses were collected and 2288 were included in the study. Overall, 51.6% (n = 1183) of respondents felt the PIA system was unfair, 76.3% (n = 1746) felt they had lost control of their application, and 46.3% (n = 1049) had noticed a negative effect on their physical or mental health. Notably, 48.2% (n = 1094) of students who responded are now considering a career outside the National Health Service (NHS).

Conclusions: Overall, the PIA system falls short of students' expectations and has led to record numbers of students considering careers outside the NHS. Further changes to this system are needed and should aim to address fairness and equity while rewarding students for their hard work. According to these data, the PIA system risks further deteriorating workforce morale and attrition rates.

医学生对基础训练的洞察(MEDSIFT):一项全国横断面在线调查显示,近50%的医学生正在考虑在NHS以外的职业。
简介:2024年英国队列预科项目(UKFPO)引入了新的择优分配(PIA)系统,标志着前几年传统的精英“排名”的转变。PIA是一个电脑生成的分配和院长优先系统,而不是预约基础课程的学额。这一变化引起了学生和临床医生的许多关注。目的:了解医学生对UKFPO PIA新制度的看法。方法:向英国2024年、2025年或2026年毕业的医学生分发在线问卷。结果:共收集问卷2297份,其中2288份纳入研究。总体而言,51.6% (n = 1183)的受访者认为PIA系统不公平,76.3% (n = 1746)的受访者认为他们失去了对申请的控制,46.3% (n = 1049)的受访者注意到对他们的身心健康产生了负面影响。值得注意的是,48.2% (n = 1094)的受访学生现在正在考虑在国家医疗服务体系(NHS)之外的职业。结论:总的来说,PIA系统没有达到学生的期望,并导致创纪录数量的学生考虑在NHS以外的职业。这一制度需要进一步的改革,应该致力于解决公平和公平问题,同时奖励学生的努力。根据这些数据,PIA系统有进一步恶化员工士气和流失率的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信