Vishal Sarwahi, Katherine Eigo, Effat Rahman, Brian Li, Victor Koltenyuk, Sayyida Hasan, Keshin Visahan, Yungtai Lo, Jon-Paul DiMauro, Terry Amaral
{"title":"Posterior Spinal Fusion with Rib Resection Allows for Improved Deformity Correction as well as Patient Satisfaction.","authors":"Vishal Sarwahi, Katherine Eigo, Effat Rahman, Brian Li, Victor Koltenyuk, Sayyida Hasan, Keshin Visahan, Yungtai Lo, Jon-Paul DiMauro, Terry Amaral","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compared radiographic and clinical outcomes in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with and without thoracoplasty.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformity. As a result, patients often have an associated rib cage deformity, with clinical and aesthetic implications. Direct vertebral rotation (DVR) allows for some reduction of the rib hump; however, the deformed ribs remain deformed. Rib resection has been utilized to further reduce the rib hump, however there are concerns of increased pain, operative time, and blood loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of 400 AIS patients undergoing PSF between 2018-2023. Patients were stratified based on those who underwent rib resectioning (RR) and those who did not (Non-Rib Resection, N-RR). Radiographic, surgical, and clinical outcomes were compared. Clinical outcomes were collected utilizing SRS-22 and our institution's activity questionnaire, validated via \"test-retest\" method. All data is presented as medians, IQR, frequencies, and percents. Fisher's Exact, Chi-squared, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>153 patients were in the RR group, 247 were in the N-RR. Preoperative rib hump was not statistically significant between the two groups (P=0.49). Final rib hump was 16.3 mm in RR patients and 29.8 mm in N-RR (P<0.001). RR had 60.5% rib hump correction; N-RR had 30.4% correction (P<0.001). Patient reported self-image (P=0.02) and mental health (P=0.01) scores had significantly improved in RR. No differences in 90-day complication rates (P=0.19) or self-reported return to activities (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rib resectioned patients had approximately double the amount of rib hump correction at 60.5%, compared to those who did not undergo rib resectioning at 30.4%, with no increase in the rate of complications. RR patients had improved self-reported self-image and mental health scores, with no difference in timing for return to activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Objective: This study aimed to compared radiographic and clinical outcomes in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with and without thoracoplasty.
Summary of background data: Scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformity. As a result, patients often have an associated rib cage deformity, with clinical and aesthetic implications. Direct vertebral rotation (DVR) allows for some reduction of the rib hump; however, the deformed ribs remain deformed. Rib resection has been utilized to further reduce the rib hump, however there are concerns of increased pain, operative time, and blood loss.
Methods: Retrospective review of 400 AIS patients undergoing PSF between 2018-2023. Patients were stratified based on those who underwent rib resectioning (RR) and those who did not (Non-Rib Resection, N-RR). Radiographic, surgical, and clinical outcomes were compared. Clinical outcomes were collected utilizing SRS-22 and our institution's activity questionnaire, validated via "test-retest" method. All data is presented as medians, IQR, frequencies, and percents. Fisher's Exact, Chi-squared, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used.
Results: 153 patients were in the RR group, 247 were in the N-RR. Preoperative rib hump was not statistically significant between the two groups (P=0.49). Final rib hump was 16.3 mm in RR patients and 29.8 mm in N-RR (P<0.001). RR had 60.5% rib hump correction; N-RR had 30.4% correction (P<0.001). Patient reported self-image (P=0.02) and mental health (P=0.01) scores had significantly improved in RR. No differences in 90-day complication rates (P=0.19) or self-reported return to activities (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Rib resectioned patients had approximately double the amount of rib hump correction at 60.5%, compared to those who did not undergo rib resectioning at 30.4%, with no increase in the rate of complications. RR patients had improved self-reported self-image and mental health scores, with no difference in timing for return to activities.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.