Identifying Latent Profiles of Healthy Adults' Biopsychosocial Pain Concepts.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2025-05-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/prm/5706849
Catherina Lenhof, Laura Dukek, Linda Wickering, Lena Hitschler, Michael Schneider, Tanja Hechler
{"title":"Identifying Latent Profiles of Healthy Adults' Biopsychosocial Pain Concepts.","authors":"Catherina Lenhof, Laura Dukek, Linda Wickering, Lena Hitschler, Michael Schneider, Tanja Hechler","doi":"10.1155/prm/5706849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To develop effective, individualized pain science education for people with chronic (primary) pain, underlying pain concepts, defined as the understanding of what pain is, what function it serves, and what processes are thought to underpin it, are essential. Pain concepts and misconcepts of chronic pain can influence its development and maintenance. This study explores whether profiles of healthy adults' biopsychosocial pain concepts can be identified using a newly developed tool, the <i>biopsychosocial pain concept matrix</i> (BiPS matrix), and if adults assigned to the profiles differ regarding sociodemographic and pain-related variables. <b>Methods:</b> <i>N</i> = 229 healthy adults (75% female, <i>M</i> = 22.66 years, SD = 3.61) participated in an online survey. The BiPS matrix assesses biopsychosocial pain concepts through 40 items on the biological, psychological, and social domains combined with the five content dimensions of the common-sense model of self-regulation. <b>Results:</b> A latent profile analysis (LPA) revealed a five-profile solution with distinct patterns of biopsychosocial pain concepts. Participants assigned to Profile 1 demonstrated strongly developed biopsychosocial pain concepts, Profile 2 showed weakly developed concepts, and Profiles 3 to 5 showed different levels of pain concepts. General and neurophysiological pain knowledge differed between profiles, with higher scores being associated with Profile 1 and lower scores with Profile 5. There were no differences in sociodemographic variables in adults assigned to the different profiles. <b>Discussion:</b> Results provide preliminary evidence for distinct profiles of biopsychosocial pain concepts among healthy adults. Further research should replicate these findings in clinical samples to better understand biopsychosocial pain concepts and their use for individualized pain science education.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5706849"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/5706849","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop effective, individualized pain science education for people with chronic (primary) pain, underlying pain concepts, defined as the understanding of what pain is, what function it serves, and what processes are thought to underpin it, are essential. Pain concepts and misconcepts of chronic pain can influence its development and maintenance. This study explores whether profiles of healthy adults' biopsychosocial pain concepts can be identified using a newly developed tool, the biopsychosocial pain concept matrix (BiPS matrix), and if adults assigned to the profiles differ regarding sociodemographic and pain-related variables. Methods: N = 229 healthy adults (75% female, M = 22.66 years, SD = 3.61) participated in an online survey. The BiPS matrix assesses biopsychosocial pain concepts through 40 items on the biological, psychological, and social domains combined with the five content dimensions of the common-sense model of self-regulation. Results: A latent profile analysis (LPA) revealed a five-profile solution with distinct patterns of biopsychosocial pain concepts. Participants assigned to Profile 1 demonstrated strongly developed biopsychosocial pain concepts, Profile 2 showed weakly developed concepts, and Profiles 3 to 5 showed different levels of pain concepts. General and neurophysiological pain knowledge differed between profiles, with higher scores being associated with Profile 1 and lower scores with Profile 5. There were no differences in sociodemographic variables in adults assigned to the different profiles. Discussion: Results provide preliminary evidence for distinct profiles of biopsychosocial pain concepts among healthy adults. Further research should replicate these findings in clinical samples to better understand biopsychosocial pain concepts and their use for individualized pain science education.

确定健康成人的生物心理社会疼痛概念的潜在特征。
目标:为慢性(原发性)疼痛患者发展有效的、个性化的疼痛科学教育,基本的疼痛概念,定义为理解疼痛是什么,它的功能是什么,以及什么过程被认为是支撑疼痛的基础,是必不可少的。疼痛的概念和误解慢性疼痛可以影响其发展和维持。本研究探讨了健康成人的生物心理社会疼痛概念是否可以使用一种新开发的工具来识别,即生物心理社会疼痛概念矩阵(BiPS矩阵),以及分配给这些特征的成年人是否在社会人口学和疼痛相关变量方面存在差异。方法:对229名健康成人进行在线调查,其中女性占75%,M = 22.66岁,SD = 3.61。BiPS矩阵通过生物、心理和社会领域的40个项目,结合自我调节常识模型的五个内容维度,评估生物心理社会疼痛概念。结果:潜在特征分析(LPA)揭示了具有不同生物心理社会疼痛概念模式的五特征解决方案。1组的参与者表现出强烈的生物心理社会疼痛概念,2组的参与者表现出较弱的疼痛概念,3 - 5组的参与者表现出不同程度的疼痛概念。一般的和神经生理性的疼痛知识在不同的概况之间存在差异,较高的分数与概况1相关,较低的分数与概况5相关。在分配到不同概况的成年人中,社会人口学变量没有差异。讨论:研究结果为健康成人中不同的生物心理社会疼痛概念提供了初步证据。进一步的研究应该在临床样本中复制这些发现,以更好地理解生物心理社会疼痛概念及其在个性化疼痛科学教育中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信