Early versus delayed silo closure in gastroschisis: a retrospective study.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pragati Sharma, Parshotam Gera, Shripada Rao
{"title":"Early versus delayed silo closure in gastroschisis: a retrospective study.","authors":"Pragati Sharma, Parshotam Gera, Shripada Rao","doi":"10.1007/s00383-025-06042-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A well accepted approach to the management of gastroschisis is gradual reduction of the herniated viscera using preformed silos followed by surgical closure of the abdominal wall defect. However, if the abdominal wall closure is delayed for a longer duration than necessary, it may increase morbidities. We sought to compare the outcomes of infants undergoing silo reduction whose abdominal wall defect was closed ≤ 5 days versus > 5 days after birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study (January-2010 to December-2020).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred-and-nine infants who were managed using primary silo with staged reduction were included. Median gestation was 36.2 (interquartile range, IQR: 35.2, 37) weeks. Ten infants had complex gastroschisis. Thirty-four infants underwent early-closure of abdominal wall defect and 75 had delayed closure. Mortality rate was 2.7% (3/109; one in early and two in delayed closure). The median age at full feeds was 24.5 days (IQR 17.5, 30) in the delayed-closure group vs 15 (12.5, 22.5) in the early-closure group. The median hospital stay was 32 days (IQR 23, 43) vs 19 (15, 30) days. On multivariable analysis, delayed closure (Exponentiated regression coefficient ERC 1.40, 95% confidence interval CI: 1.05, 1.86, P = 0.020) and complex gastroschisis (ERC 2.03; 95% CI: 1.11, 3.72, P = 0.021) were associated with longer time to reach full feeds. Same factors were associated with longer duration of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gradual reduction using silos achieved excellent outcomes in neonates with gastroschisis. Completing the silo reduction and closing the abdominal wall within five days could further improve their outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"41 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-025-06042-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A well accepted approach to the management of gastroschisis is gradual reduction of the herniated viscera using preformed silos followed by surgical closure of the abdominal wall defect. However, if the abdominal wall closure is delayed for a longer duration than necessary, it may increase morbidities. We sought to compare the outcomes of infants undergoing silo reduction whose abdominal wall defect was closed ≤ 5 days versus > 5 days after birth.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study (January-2010 to December-2020).

Results: One-hundred-and-nine infants who were managed using primary silo with staged reduction were included. Median gestation was 36.2 (interquartile range, IQR: 35.2, 37) weeks. Ten infants had complex gastroschisis. Thirty-four infants underwent early-closure of abdominal wall defect and 75 had delayed closure. Mortality rate was 2.7% (3/109; one in early and two in delayed closure). The median age at full feeds was 24.5 days (IQR 17.5, 30) in the delayed-closure group vs 15 (12.5, 22.5) in the early-closure group. The median hospital stay was 32 days (IQR 23, 43) vs 19 (15, 30) days. On multivariable analysis, delayed closure (Exponentiated regression coefficient ERC 1.40, 95% confidence interval CI: 1.05, 1.86, P = 0.020) and complex gastroschisis (ERC 2.03; 95% CI: 1.11, 3.72, P = 0.021) were associated with longer time to reach full feeds. Same factors were associated with longer duration of hospital stay.

Conclusions: Gradual reduction using silos achieved excellent outcomes in neonates with gastroschisis. Completing the silo reduction and closing the abdominal wall within five days could further improve their outcomes.

腹裂的早期与延迟封闭:一项回顾性研究。
背景:胃裂的一种广为接受的治疗方法是使用预制的筒仓逐渐减少突出的脏器,然后手术关闭腹壁缺损。然而,如果腹壁闭合延迟的时间比必要的时间长,则可能增加发病率。我们试图比较腹壁缺损闭合≤5天和出生后5天进行筒仓复位的婴儿的结果。方法:回顾性队列研究(2010年1月至2020年12月)。结果:纳入了109例采用初级筒仓并分阶段复位的婴儿。中位妊娠期为36.2周(四分位数间距,IQR: 35.2, 37)。10例患儿有复杂胃裂。34例患儿早期修补腹壁缺损,75例患儿延迟修补腹壁缺损。死亡率2.7% (3/109;1例提前关闭,2例延迟关闭)。完全喂养时,延迟关闭组的中位年龄为24.5天(IQR为17.5,30),而提前关闭组为15天(12.5,22.5)。中位住院时间为32天(IQR 23,43)对19天(IQR 15,30)。在多变量分析中,延迟闭合(指数回归系数ERC 1.40, 95%可信区间CI: 1.05, 1.86, P = 0.020)和复杂腹裂(ERC 2.03;95% CI: 1.11, 3.72, P = 0.021)与较长的喂食时间相关。同样的因素也与更长的住院时间有关。结论:使用筒仓逐步复位治疗胃裂新生儿取得了很好的效果。在5天内完成筒仓复位和关闭腹壁可以进一步改善他们的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信