Breaking Down Instability: The Associations between Muscle Health, Facet Joint Morphology, Spinopelvic Alignment, and Stability Status in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Eric Zhao, Sereen Halayqeh, Troy Amen, Austin Kaidi, Zora Hahn, John Lama, Arsen Omurzakov, Tim Xu, Luis Colon, Tomoyuki Asada, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Quante Singleton, Farah Musharbash, Atahan Durbas, Adrian Lui, Andrea Pezzi, Adin Ehrlich, Myles Allen, Olivia Tuma, Kasra Araghi, Tarek Harhash, James Dowdell, Kyle Morse, Francis Lovecchio, Sheeraz Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer
{"title":"Breaking Down Instability: The Associations between Muscle Health, Facet Joint Morphology, Spinopelvic Alignment, and Stability Status in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.","authors":"Eric Zhao, Sereen Halayqeh, Troy Amen, Austin Kaidi, Zora Hahn, John Lama, Arsen Omurzakov, Tim Xu, Luis Colon, Tomoyuki Asada, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Quante Singleton, Farah Musharbash, Atahan Durbas, Adrian Lui, Andrea Pezzi, Adin Ehrlich, Myles Allen, Olivia Tuma, Kasra Araghi, Tarek Harhash, James Dowdell, Kyle Morse, Francis Lovecchio, Sheeraz Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to compare muscle health and imaging markers in patients with 1-level L4-L5 stable versus unstable degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>DLS may be stable or unstable. It is unknown how muscle health and other imaging markers are associated with DLS stability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients≥18 years with 1-level L4-L5 DLS and preoperative flexion/extension radiographs were included. Normalized total psoas area (NTPA), body mass index (BMI)-normalized paralumbar (PL) (multifidus [MF]+erector spinae [ES]) cross-sectional area (PL-CSA/BMI), and Goutallier were assessed. Other L4-L5 markers included: facet orientation, slip percentage, pelvic incidence (PI), tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and PI-LL. Instability was defined as>3 mm translation or>10 degrees endplate change on flexion-extension. Low versus normal muscle health was defined as NTPA or PL-CSA/BMI below the lowest sex-specific quartile. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine variables associated with instability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>251 patients (unstable=50; stable=201) were included. There were no significant differences in muscle health at L3, L4, or L5 or Goutallier on univariate analysis. The stable cohort had smaller slip percentage (19±9% vs. 15±8%, P=0.007) and PI-LL (13.56±12.75 vs. 5.81±14.46, P=0.001). The stable cohort had more patients with MF and ES total Goutallier≤2 (P=0.031, P=0.002, respectively) at L3-L4 versus L4-L5 and more patients with MF and ES total Goutallier≤2 (P=0.013, P=0.004, respectively) at L4-L5 versus L5-S1. On regression, low L4-L5 MF Goutallier was associated with instability (OR: 2.50, 95% CI [1.01 - 6.20], P=0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with unstable L4-L5 spondylolisthesis have lower multifidus Goutallier at the slip level, greater slip percentage, and greater PI-LL mismatch. Patients with stable L4-L5 spondylolisthesis have greater Goutallier of the caudal paralumbars.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: to compare muscle health and imaging markers in patients with 1-level L4-L5 stable versus unstable degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).
Summary of background data: DLS may be stable or unstable. It is unknown how muscle health and other imaging markers are associated with DLS stability.
Methods: Patients≥18 years with 1-level L4-L5 DLS and preoperative flexion/extension radiographs were included. Normalized total psoas area (NTPA), body mass index (BMI)-normalized paralumbar (PL) (multifidus [MF]+erector spinae [ES]) cross-sectional area (PL-CSA/BMI), and Goutallier were assessed. Other L4-L5 markers included: facet orientation, slip percentage, pelvic incidence (PI), tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and PI-LL. Instability was defined as>3 mm translation or>10 degrees endplate change on flexion-extension. Low versus normal muscle health was defined as NTPA or PL-CSA/BMI below the lowest sex-specific quartile. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine variables associated with instability.
Results: 251 patients (unstable=50; stable=201) were included. There were no significant differences in muscle health at L3, L4, or L5 or Goutallier on univariate analysis. The stable cohort had smaller slip percentage (19±9% vs. 15±8%, P=0.007) and PI-LL (13.56±12.75 vs. 5.81±14.46, P=0.001). The stable cohort had more patients with MF and ES total Goutallier≤2 (P=0.031, P=0.002, respectively) at L3-L4 versus L4-L5 and more patients with MF and ES total Goutallier≤2 (P=0.013, P=0.004, respectively) at L4-L5 versus L5-S1. On regression, low L4-L5 MF Goutallier was associated with instability (OR: 2.50, 95% CI [1.01 - 6.20], P=0.047).
Conclusion: Patients with unstable L4-L5 spondylolisthesis have lower multifidus Goutallier at the slip level, greater slip percentage, and greater PI-LL mismatch. Patients with stable L4-L5 spondylolisthesis have greater Goutallier of the caudal paralumbars.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.