Breaking Down Instability: The Associations between Muscle Health, Facet Joint Morphology, Spinopelvic Alignment, and Stability Status in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005393
Eric Zhao, Sereen Halayqeh, Troy Amen, Austin Kaidi, Zora Hahn, John Lama, Arsen Omurzakov, Tim Xu, Luis Colon, Tomoyuki Asada, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Quante Singleton, Farah Musharbash, Atahan Durbas, Adrian Lui, Andrea Pezzi, Adin Ehrlich, Myles Allen, Olivia Tuma, Kasra Araghi, Tarek Harhash, James Dowdell, Kyle Morse, Francis Lovecchio, Sheeraz Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer
{"title":"Breaking Down Instability: The Associations between Muscle Health, Facet Joint Morphology, Spinopelvic Alignment, and Stability Status in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.","authors":"Eric Zhao, Sereen Halayqeh, Troy Amen, Austin Kaidi, Zora Hahn, John Lama, Arsen Omurzakov, Tim Xu, Luis Colon, Tomoyuki Asada, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Quante Singleton, Farah Musharbash, Atahan Durbas, Adrian Lui, Andrea Pezzi, Adin Ehrlich, Myles Allen, Olivia Tuma, Kasra Araghi, Tarek Harhash, James Dowdell, Kyle Morse, Francis Lovecchio, Sheeraz Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to compare muscle health and imaging markers in patients with 1-level L4-L5 stable versus unstable degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>DLS may be stable or unstable. It is unknown how muscle health and other imaging markers are associated with DLS stability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients≥18 years with 1-level L4-L5 DLS and preoperative flexion/extension radiographs were included. Normalized total psoas area (NTPA), body mass index (BMI)-normalized paralumbar (PL) (multifidus [MF]+erector spinae [ES]) cross-sectional area (PL-CSA/BMI), and Goutallier were assessed. Other L4-L5 markers included: facet orientation, slip percentage, pelvic incidence (PI), tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and PI-LL. Instability was defined as>3 mm translation or>10 degrees endplate change on flexion-extension. Low versus normal muscle health was defined as NTPA or PL-CSA/BMI below the lowest sex-specific quartile. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine variables associated with instability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>251 patients (unstable=50; stable=201) were included. There were no significant differences in muscle health at L3, L4, or L5 or Goutallier on univariate analysis. The stable cohort had smaller slip percentage (19±9% vs. 15±8%, P=0.007) and PI-LL (13.56±12.75 vs. 5.81±14.46, P=0.001). The stable cohort had more patients with MF and ES total Goutallier≤2 (P=0.031, P=0.002, respectively) at L3-L4 versus L4-L5 and more patients with MF and ES total Goutallier≤2 (P=0.013, P=0.004, respectively) at L4-L5 versus L5-S1. On regression, low L4-L5 MF Goutallier was associated with instability (OR: 2.50, 95% CI [1.01 - 6.20], P=0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with unstable L4-L5 spondylolisthesis have lower multifidus Goutallier at the slip level, greater slip percentage, and greater PI-LL mismatch. Patients with stable L4-L5 spondylolisthesis have greater Goutallier of the caudal paralumbars.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: to compare muscle health and imaging markers in patients with 1-level L4-L5 stable versus unstable degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).

Summary of background data: DLS may be stable or unstable. It is unknown how muscle health and other imaging markers are associated with DLS stability.

Methods: Patients≥18 years with 1-level L4-L5 DLS and preoperative flexion/extension radiographs were included. Normalized total psoas area (NTPA), body mass index (BMI)-normalized paralumbar (PL) (multifidus [MF]+erector spinae [ES]) cross-sectional area (PL-CSA/BMI), and Goutallier were assessed. Other L4-L5 markers included: facet orientation, slip percentage, pelvic incidence (PI), tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and PI-LL. Instability was defined as>3 mm translation or>10 degrees endplate change on flexion-extension. Low versus normal muscle health was defined as NTPA or PL-CSA/BMI below the lowest sex-specific quartile. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine variables associated with instability.

Results: 251 patients (unstable=50; stable=201) were included. There were no significant differences in muscle health at L3, L4, or L5 or Goutallier on univariate analysis. The stable cohort had smaller slip percentage (19±9% vs. 15±8%, P=0.007) and PI-LL (13.56±12.75 vs. 5.81±14.46, P=0.001). The stable cohort had more patients with MF and ES total Goutallier≤2 (P=0.031, P=0.002, respectively) at L3-L4 versus L4-L5 and more patients with MF and ES total Goutallier≤2 (P=0.013, P=0.004, respectively) at L4-L5 versus L5-S1. On regression, low L4-L5 MF Goutallier was associated with instability (OR: 2.50, 95% CI [1.01 - 6.20], P=0.047).

Conclusion: Patients with unstable L4-L5 spondylolisthesis have lower multifidus Goutallier at the slip level, greater slip percentage, and greater PI-LL mismatch. Patients with stable L4-L5 spondylolisthesis have greater Goutallier of the caudal paralumbars.

Level of evidence: 3.

打破不稳定性:退行性腰椎滑脱中肌肉健康、小关节形态、脊柱骨盆对齐和稳定性状态之间的关系。
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:比较1级L4-L5稳定型与不稳定型退行性腰椎滑脱(DLS)患者的肌肉健康和影像学指标。背景资料总结:DLS可能稳定,也可能不稳定。肌肉健康和其他影像学指标与DLS稳定性的关系尚不清楚。方法:纳入年龄≥18岁的1级L4-L5 DLS患者和术前屈伸片。评估归一化腰大肌总面积(NTPA)、体重指数(BMI)-归一化腰旁肌(多裂肌[MF]+竖脊肌[ES])横截面积(PL- csa /BMI)和Goutallier。其他L4-L5指标包括:关节突方向、滑移率、骨盆发生率(PI)、倾斜(PT)、骶骨坡度(SS)、腰椎前凸(LL)和PI-LL。不稳定性被定义为> - 3mm平移或> - 10度终板屈伸变化。与正常肌肉健康相比,低肌肉健康被定义为NTPA或PL-CSA/BMI低于最低性别特异性四分位数。多变量逻辑回归用于确定与不稳定性相关的变量。结果:251例患者(不稳定=50例;稳定=201)。单变量分析中,L3、L4、L5或Goutallier的肌肉健康状况无显著差异。稳定组的失速率(19±9%比15±8%,P=0.007)和PI-LL(13.56±12.75比5.81±14.46,P=0.001)较小。稳定队列在L3-L4阶段比L4-L5阶段有更多MF和ES总Goutallier≤2的患者(P=0.031, P=0.002), L4-L5阶段比L5-S1阶段有更多MF和ES总Goutallier≤2的患者(P=0.013, P=0.004)。在回归分析中,低L4-L5 MF Goutallier与不稳定性相关(OR: 2.50, 95% CI [1.01 - 6.20], P=0.047)。结论:不稳定L4-L5椎体滑脱患者的多裂肌滑移水平较低,滑移率较大,PI-LL失配较大。稳定的L4-L5椎体滑脱患者有较大的尾侧前凸。证据等级:3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信