The Causal Effect of Basal Metabolic Rate on Type 2 Diabetes: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of Diabetes Research Pub Date : 2025-05-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jdr/6523642
Yu Huang, Jianxuan Wen, Xiaofeng Liao, Guiling Chen, Xiang Zeng, Yu Chen
{"title":"The Causal Effect of Basal Metabolic Rate on Type 2 Diabetes: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.","authors":"Yu Huang, Jianxuan Wen, Xiaofeng Liao, Guiling Chen, Xiang Zeng, Yu Chen","doi":"10.1155/jdr/6523642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> This study is aimed at systematically investigating the potential causal impact of basal metabolic rate (BMR) on the risk of Type 2 diabetes (T2D). <b>Methods:</b> Data pertaining to single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with BMR and T2D were gathered through a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Employing T2D as the dependent variable and BMR as the independent variable, SNPs displaying significant correlation with BMR were identified as instrumental variables (IVs). We also performed multivariable MR (MVMR) analyses using two different BMR datasets. The connection between BMR and the risk of T2D was scrutinized using the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, and a sensitivity analysis was executed to evaluate heterogeneity and pleiotropy. <b>Results:</b> A potential causal relationship between higher BMR and increased T2D risk was observed (odds ratio (OR), 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.31-1.7; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Significant heterogeneity was identified (Cochran's <i>Q</i> test, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the findings, with no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy and consistent results in leave-one-out tests. The MR-PRESSO test identified no outliers, confirming the absence of unknown pleiotropic effects. MVMR analyses, however, showed that the evidence became weaker after conditioning on BMI. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our study provides robust evidence of a causal link between higher BMR and increased T2D risk. Despite heterogeneity, sensitivity analyses support our findings, warranting further research to confirm results and explore underlying mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":15576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Research","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6523642"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jdr/6523642","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study is aimed at systematically investigating the potential causal impact of basal metabolic rate (BMR) on the risk of Type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: Data pertaining to single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with BMR and T2D were gathered through a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Employing T2D as the dependent variable and BMR as the independent variable, SNPs displaying significant correlation with BMR were identified as instrumental variables (IVs). We also performed multivariable MR (MVMR) analyses using two different BMR datasets. The connection between BMR and the risk of T2D was scrutinized using the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, and a sensitivity analysis was executed to evaluate heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Results: A potential causal relationship between higher BMR and increased T2D risk was observed (odds ratio (OR), 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.31-1.7; p < 0.001). Significant heterogeneity was identified (Cochran's Q test, p < 0.001). However, sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the findings, with no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy and consistent results in leave-one-out tests. The MR-PRESSO test identified no outliers, confirming the absence of unknown pleiotropic effects. MVMR analyses, however, showed that the evidence became weaker after conditioning on BMI. Conclusion: Our study provides robust evidence of a causal link between higher BMR and increased T2D risk. Despite heterogeneity, sensitivity analyses support our findings, warranting further research to confirm results and explore underlying mechanisms.

基础代谢率对2型糖尿病的因果影响:一项双样本孟德尔随机研究。
目的:本研究旨在系统探讨基础代谢率(BMR)对2型糖尿病(T2D)风险的潜在因果影响。方法:通过全基因组关联研究(GWAS)收集与BMR和T2D相关的单核苷酸多态性(snp)数据。以T2D为因变量,BMR为自变量,确定与BMR有显著相关性的snp为工具变量(IVs)。我们还使用两种不同的BMR数据集进行了多变量MR (MVMR)分析。使用反方差加权(IVW)方法仔细检查BMR与T2D风险之间的联系,并进行敏感性分析以评估异质性和多效性。结果:观察到较高的BMR与增加的T2D风险之间存在潜在的因果关系(优势比(OR), 1.49;95%置信区间(CI), 1.31-1.7;P < 0.001)。发现了显著的异质性(科克伦Q检验,p < 0.001)。然而,敏感性分析证明了研究结果的稳健性,没有证据表明存在水平多效性,并且在留一试验中结果一致。MR-PRESSO测试没有发现异常值,证实不存在未知的多效性效应。然而,MVMR分析显示,在对BMI进行调节后,证据变得较弱。结论:我们的研究提供了强有力的证据,证明较高的BMR和增加的T2D风险之间存在因果关系。尽管存在异质性,但敏感性分析支持我们的发现,需要进一步的研究来确认结果并探索潜在的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Research
Journal of Diabetes Research ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
152
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes Research is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The journal welcomes submissions focusing on the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, and prevention of diabetes, as well as associated complications, such as diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信