Prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes in intermediate-risk endometrial cancer: results from an international, multi-institutional study.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Giuseppe Cucinella, Gabriella Schivardi, Xun Clare Zhou, Mariam M AlHilli, Sumer Wallace, Allan Covens, Christoph Wohlmuth, Glauco Baiocchi, Nedim Tokgozoglu, Francesco Raspagliesi, Alessandro Buda, Vanna Zanagnolo, Ignacio Zapardiel, Nisha Jagasia, Robert Giuntoli, Ariel Glickman, Michele Peiretti, Maximillian Lanner, Enrique Chacon, Julian Di Guilmi, Augusto Pereira, Enora Laas, Ami Fishman, Caroline C Nitschmann, Katherine Kurnit, Kristen Moriarty, Amy Joehlin-Price, Brittany Lees, Louise De Brot, Cagatay Taskiran, Giorgio Bogani, Fabio Landoni, Luis Chiva, Tommaso Grassi, Tommaso Bianchi, Francesco Multinu, Luigi Antonio De Vitis, Alicia Hernandez-Gutierrez, Spyridon Mastroyannis, Khaled Ghoniem, Emilia Palmieri, Vito Chiantera, Shahi Maryam, Angela J Fought, Michaela E McGree, Andrea Mariani, Gretchen Glaser
{"title":"Prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes in intermediate-risk endometrial cancer: results from an international, multi-institutional study.","authors":"Giuseppe Cucinella, Gabriella Schivardi, Xun Clare Zhou, Mariam M AlHilli, Sumer Wallace, Allan Covens, Christoph Wohlmuth, Glauco Baiocchi, Nedim Tokgozoglu, Francesco Raspagliesi, Alessandro Buda, Vanna Zanagnolo, Ignacio Zapardiel, Nisha Jagasia, Robert Giuntoli, Ariel Glickman, Michele Peiretti, Maximillian Lanner, Enrique Chacon, Julian Di Guilmi, Augusto Pereira, Enora Laas, Ami Fishman, Caroline C Nitschmann, Katherine Kurnit, Kristen Moriarty, Amy Joehlin-Price, Brittany Lees, Louise De Brot, Cagatay Taskiran, Giorgio Bogani, Fabio Landoni, Luis Chiva, Tommaso Grassi, Tommaso Bianchi, Francesco Multinu, Luigi Antonio De Vitis, Alicia Hernandez-Gutierrez, Spyridon Mastroyannis, Khaled Ghoniem, Emilia Palmieri, Vito Chiantera, Shahi Maryam, Angela J Fought, Michaela E McGree, Andrea Mariani, Gretchen Glaser","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed oncologic outcomes of patients with intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer and isolated tumor cells (ITC) (≤0.2 mm or ≤200 cells) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with SLN-ITC diagnosed between 2012 and 2019 were identified from 19 centers worldwide, while SLN-negative patients were identified at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between 2014 and 2018. Only patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and intermediate-risk factors (low-grade endometrioid histology and myometrial invasion ≥50%; high-grade endometrioid histology and myometrial invasion <50%) were included. Oncologic outcomes were evaluated by grouping patients according to prognostic factors: SLN-ITC and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). SLN-ITC patients with post-operative observation or vaginal brachytherapy (VB) alone were compared with similar node-negative patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 166 patients included, those with simultaneous presence of SLN-ITC and LVSI were at higher risk of non-vaginal recurrence (HR 3.73 [95% CI 1.17 to 11.84], p = .01) compared with patients who were node-negative with no LVSI. Among the 122 patients (28 SLN-ITC, 94 node-negative) who underwent post-operative observation or VB alone, 1 isolated vaginal recurrence was documented in a node-negative patient, while non-vaginal recurrence occurred in 3 of 28 (10.7%) SLN-ITC and 7 of 94 (7.4%) node-negative patients. The median follow-up was 2.4 years (interquartile range; 1.8-3.0) among the remaining 25 ITC patients and 2.8 years (interquartile range; 0.8-4.2) among the remaining 87 node-negative patients. There was no difference in non-vaginal recurrence-free survival (SLN-ITC: 87.3% [95% CI 74.7% to 100.0%] vs node-negative: 82.2% [95% CI 69.1% to 97.9%], p = .46) or overall survival (SLN-ITC: 76.4% [95% CI 54.3 to 100.0] vs node-negative: 84.5% [95% CI 75.0 to 95.2], p = .28) between the 2 cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and intermediate-risk factors (including patients who received chemotherapy/external beam radiotherapy), the combination of SLN-ITC and LVSI was associated with worse prognosis compared with patients with no risk factors or only 1 risk factor. In the sub-group of patients who received post-operative observation or VB alone, SLN-ITC did not worsen prognosis relative to node-negative patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 7","pages":"101906"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101906","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed oncologic outcomes of patients with intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer and isolated tumor cells (ITC) (≤0.2 mm or ≤200 cells) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs).

Methods: Patients with SLN-ITC diagnosed between 2012 and 2019 were identified from 19 centers worldwide, while SLN-negative patients were identified at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between 2014 and 2018. Only patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and intermediate-risk factors (low-grade endometrioid histology and myometrial invasion ≥50%; high-grade endometrioid histology and myometrial invasion <50%) were included. Oncologic outcomes were evaluated by grouping patients according to prognostic factors: SLN-ITC and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). SLN-ITC patients with post-operative observation or vaginal brachytherapy (VB) alone were compared with similar node-negative patients.

Results: Of the 166 patients included, those with simultaneous presence of SLN-ITC and LVSI were at higher risk of non-vaginal recurrence (HR 3.73 [95% CI 1.17 to 11.84], p = .01) compared with patients who were node-negative with no LVSI. Among the 122 patients (28 SLN-ITC, 94 node-negative) who underwent post-operative observation or VB alone, 1 isolated vaginal recurrence was documented in a node-negative patient, while non-vaginal recurrence occurred in 3 of 28 (10.7%) SLN-ITC and 7 of 94 (7.4%) node-negative patients. The median follow-up was 2.4 years (interquartile range; 1.8-3.0) among the remaining 25 ITC patients and 2.8 years (interquartile range; 0.8-4.2) among the remaining 87 node-negative patients. There was no difference in non-vaginal recurrence-free survival (SLN-ITC: 87.3% [95% CI 74.7% to 100.0%] vs node-negative: 82.2% [95% CI 69.1% to 97.9%], p = .46) or overall survival (SLN-ITC: 76.4% [95% CI 54.3 to 100.0] vs node-negative: 84.5% [95% CI 75.0 to 95.2], p = .28) between the 2 cohorts.

Conclusions: In patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and intermediate-risk factors (including patients who received chemotherapy/external beam radiotherapy), the combination of SLN-ITC and LVSI was associated with worse prognosis compared with patients with no risk factors or only 1 risk factor. In the sub-group of patients who received post-operative observation or VB alone, SLN-ITC did not worsen prognosis relative to node-negative patients.

中危子宫内膜癌前哨淋巴结分离肿瘤细胞的预后价值:来自一项国际、多机构研究的结果
目的:本研究评估前哨淋巴结(sln)中危子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌和分离肿瘤细胞(ITC)(≤0.2 mm或≤200个细胞)患者的肿瘤预后。方法:2012年至2019年诊断为SLN-ITC的患者来自全球19个中心,而2014年至2018年在罗切斯特梅奥诊所发现的sln阴性患者。仅存在子宫内膜样癌和中等危险因素的患者(低级别子宫内膜样组织学和子宫肌层浸润≥50%;结果:在纳入的166例患者中,同时存在SLN-ITC和LVSI的患者与无LVSI的淋巴结阴性患者相比,非阴道复发的风险更高(HR 3.73 [95% CI 1.17至11.84],p = 0.01)。术后观察122例患者(28例SLN-ITC, 94例淋巴结阴性)或单独接受VB治疗,淋巴结阴性患者中有1例出现孤立性阴道复发,28例SLN-ITC患者中有3例(10.7%)出现非阴道复发,94例淋巴结阴性患者中有7例(7.4%)出现非阴道复发。中位随访时间为2.4年(四分位数范围;在剩余的25例ITC患者中,1.8-3.0),2.8年(四分位数间距;0.8-4.2),其余87例淋巴结阴性患者。两组患者的非阴道无复发生存率(SLN-ITC: 87.3% [95% CI 74.7%至100.0%]vs淋巴结阴性:82.2% [95% CI 69.1%至97.9%],p = 0.46)或总生存率(SLN-ITC: 76.4% [95% CI 54.3至100.0]vs淋巴结阴性:84.5% [95% CI 75.0至95.2],p = 0.28)均无差异。结论:在伴有中度危险因素的子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌患者(包括接受化疗/外束放疗的患者)中,与无危险因素或仅有1个危险因素的患者相比,SLN-ITC联合LVSI的预后更差。在接受术后观察或单独接受VB的患者亚组中,SLN-ITC相对于淋巴结阴性患者没有恶化预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信