Frequency of interpersonal discrimination experiences - differences between inpatient and outpatient care and associations with delayed and forgone care.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Olaf von dem Knesebeck, Demet Dingoyan, Anna Makowski, Jens Klein
{"title":"Frequency of interpersonal discrimination experiences - differences between inpatient and outpatient care and associations with delayed and forgone care.","authors":"Olaf von dem Knesebeck, Demet Dingoyan, Anna Makowski, Jens Klein","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02512-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the number of studies investigating the magnitude, reasons, and possible consequences of perceived discrimination in health care is growing, many of these studies do not differentiate between structural and interpersonal discrimination in health care. The latter rests upon stereotypes and takes place in direct interactions between the health care provider and the patient. In this study, we explore the frequency and main reasons of different interpersonal discrimination experiences in inpatient and outpatient care in Germany and associations of discrimination with delayed and forgone care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses were based on an online survey among the adult population in Germany (N = 3,246). A modified version of the Everyday Discrimination Scale was used to assess interpersonal discrimination experiences in inpatient and outpatient care. For each of the experiences, the main reason(s) for discrimination was ascertained. Indicators of delayed and forgone care referred to necessary doctor visits in the last 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses revealed that two thirds (66%) of the respondents reported at least one of five experiences in inpatient or outpatient care. The experience that people in health care acted as if they were better than oneself was reported most frequently (41.3% in outpatient care and 27.7% in inpatient care). All discrimination experiences were significantly more frequent in outpatient care than in inpatient care. Age and health insurance were the most frequently reported reasons for the discrimination experiences. There was a significant association of the frequency of interpersonal discrimination experiences with delayed and forgone care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Experiences of interpersonal discrimination in health care were a frequent phenomenon in Germany and were significantly associated with unmet need. Such experiences must be considered an important issue for public health. Possible interventions to tackle discrimination include measures to reduce stereotypes and the abolition of the dual structure of statutory and private health insurance.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02512-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While the number of studies investigating the magnitude, reasons, and possible consequences of perceived discrimination in health care is growing, many of these studies do not differentiate between structural and interpersonal discrimination in health care. The latter rests upon stereotypes and takes place in direct interactions between the health care provider and the patient. In this study, we explore the frequency and main reasons of different interpersonal discrimination experiences in inpatient and outpatient care in Germany and associations of discrimination with delayed and forgone care.

Methods: Analyses were based on an online survey among the adult population in Germany (N = 3,246). A modified version of the Everyday Discrimination Scale was used to assess interpersonal discrimination experiences in inpatient and outpatient care. For each of the experiences, the main reason(s) for discrimination was ascertained. Indicators of delayed and forgone care referred to necessary doctor visits in the last 12 months.

Results: Analyses revealed that two thirds (66%) of the respondents reported at least one of five experiences in inpatient or outpatient care. The experience that people in health care acted as if they were better than oneself was reported most frequently (41.3% in outpatient care and 27.7% in inpatient care). All discrimination experiences were significantly more frequent in outpatient care than in inpatient care. Age and health insurance were the most frequently reported reasons for the discrimination experiences. There was a significant association of the frequency of interpersonal discrimination experiences with delayed and forgone care.

Conclusions: Experiences of interpersonal discrimination in health care were a frequent phenomenon in Germany and were significantly associated with unmet need. Such experiences must be considered an important issue for public health. Possible interventions to tackle discrimination include measures to reduce stereotypes and the abolition of the dual structure of statutory and private health insurance.

人际歧视经历的频率-住院和门诊护理之间的差异以及与延迟和放弃护理的关系。
背景:虽然调查医疗保健中感知歧视的程度、原因和可能后果的研究越来越多,但其中许多研究没有区分医疗保健中的结构性歧视和人际歧视。后者以刻板印象为基础,发生在保健提供者和病人之间的直接互动中。在本研究中,我们探讨了在德国住院和门诊护理中不同的人际歧视经历的频率和主要原因,以及歧视与延迟和放弃护理的关系。方法:分析基于德国成人在线调查(N = 3246)。采用改良版的日常歧视量表来评估住院和门诊护理中的人际歧视经历。对于每一个经验,确定了歧视的主要原因。延迟和放弃护理的指标是指在过去12个月内必要的医生就诊。结果:分析显示,三分之二(66%)的受访者报告了至少五分之一的住院或门诊护理经历。在医疗保健中,人们表现得好像他们比自己更好的经历是最常见的(在门诊护理中为41.3%,在住院护理中为27.7%)。所有的歧视经历在门诊明显比在住院更频繁。年龄和健康保险是造成歧视的最常见原因。人际歧视经历的频率与延迟和放弃护理有显著的关联。结论:在德国,医疗保健中的人际歧视是一种常见现象,并与未满足的需求显著相关。这些经验必须被视为公共卫生的一个重要问题。消除歧视的可能干预措施包括采取措施减少陈规定型观念和废除法定和私人健康保险的双重结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信