Sara B. Stephens PhD, MPH , Christopher W. Follansbee MD , Tyler Novy MD , Taylor S. Howard MD , Tam Dan Pham MD , Anna M. Lang BS , Taylor Beecroft-Dawson MS, CGC , Abigail Yesso MS, CGC , Emily Soludczyk MS, CGC , Wenxin Zou PhD , Yuxin Fan MD, PhD , Jeffrey J. Kim MD, FHRS , Santiago O. Valdes MD , Christina Y. Miyake MD, MS, MPH
{"title":"Clinical and genetic variant re-analysis among pediatric probands undergoing genetic testing for arrhythmia syndromes","authors":"Sara B. Stephens PhD, MPH , Christopher W. Follansbee MD , Tyler Novy MD , Taylor S. Howard MD , Tam Dan Pham MD , Anna M. Lang BS , Taylor Beecroft-Dawson MS, CGC , Abigail Yesso MS, CGC , Emily Soludczyk MS, CGC , Wenxin Zou PhD , Yuxin Fan MD, PhD , Jeffrey J. Kim MD, FHRS , Santiago O. Valdes MD , Christina Y. Miyake MD, MS, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.05.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite increases in genetic testing, longitudinal data regarding changes in diagnostic yield and variant reclassification for inherited arrhythmia syndromes are limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Determine longitudinal changes in diagnostic yield and variant classification.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span><span>Single-center retrospective study of probands <18 years undergoing genetic testing for suspected inherited cardiac conditions associated with arrhythmias, 2007 to 2018. Variants were classified as diagnostic (pathogenic/likely pathogenic), non-diagnostic (benign/likely benign [B/LB]), or variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Variant reclassification was performed in October 2023 using VarSome and American College of </span>Medical Genetics criteria. We evaluated results by era (early 2007–2013 vs. later 2014–2018, coinciding with Sanger and next-generation sequencing, respectively) and by likelihood of disease based on </span>clinical evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 306 probands, initial testing was 23.2% diagnostic, 55.6% non-diagnostic (33.7% no variant, 21.9% B/LB), and 21.2% VUS. When comparing eras, diagnostic yield decreased (34.1%–15.3%), VUS increased (9.3%–29.9%), and non-diagnostic remained similar (55% to 57%). Variants for 22.7% (46/203) of probands with ≥1 variant changed: 9.9% of diagnostic variants (7/71) downgraded to VUS or non-diagnostic, and 60.0% of VUS changed (23.1% upgraded, 36.9% downgraded). B/LB variants did not change. Probands with higher disease likelihood had 6-times the odds of diagnostic results compared to lower disease likelihood, regardless of era (odds ratio 6.3, 95% confidence interval 3.2–12.4, <em>P</em> < .0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Variant reclassification led to changes in 23% of probands, both downgrading and upgrading status, even among probands initially thought to be pathogenic. When comparing later to earlier eras, VUS variants increased while diagnostic yield decreased. Findings support the need for variant re-interpretation and periodic reclassification over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"22 10","pages":"Pages e931-e938"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527125024397","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Despite increases in genetic testing, longitudinal data regarding changes in diagnostic yield and variant reclassification for inherited arrhythmia syndromes are limited.
Objective
Determine longitudinal changes in diagnostic yield and variant classification.
Methods
Single-center retrospective study of probands <18 years undergoing genetic testing for suspected inherited cardiac conditions associated with arrhythmias, 2007 to 2018. Variants were classified as diagnostic (pathogenic/likely pathogenic), non-diagnostic (benign/likely benign [B/LB]), or variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Variant reclassification was performed in October 2023 using VarSome and American College of Medical Genetics criteria. We evaluated results by era (early 2007–2013 vs. later 2014–2018, coinciding with Sanger and next-generation sequencing, respectively) and by likelihood of disease based on clinical evaluation.
Results
Of 306 probands, initial testing was 23.2% diagnostic, 55.6% non-diagnostic (33.7% no variant, 21.9% B/LB), and 21.2% VUS. When comparing eras, diagnostic yield decreased (34.1%–15.3%), VUS increased (9.3%–29.9%), and non-diagnostic remained similar (55% to 57%). Variants for 22.7% (46/203) of probands with ≥1 variant changed: 9.9% of diagnostic variants (7/71) downgraded to VUS or non-diagnostic, and 60.0% of VUS changed (23.1% upgraded, 36.9% downgraded). B/LB variants did not change. Probands with higher disease likelihood had 6-times the odds of diagnostic results compared to lower disease likelihood, regardless of era (odds ratio 6.3, 95% confidence interval 3.2–12.4, P < .0001).
Conclusion
Variant reclassification led to changes in 23% of probands, both downgrading and upgrading status, even among probands initially thought to be pathogenic. When comparing later to earlier eras, VUS variants increased while diagnostic yield decreased. Findings support the need for variant re-interpretation and periodic reclassification over time.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.