EUS-guided gallbladder drainage as a rescue in distal malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopic Ultrasound Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1097/eus.0000000000000108
Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Giuseppe Vanella, Antonio Facciorusso, Pietro Fusaroli, Fausto Catena, Judy A Trieu, Todd H Baron, Andrea Anderloni, Carlo Fabbri, Ilaria Tarantino, Lorenzo Fuccio
{"title":"EUS-guided gallbladder drainage as a rescue in distal malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Giuseppe Vanella, Antonio Facciorusso, Pietro Fusaroli, Fausto Catena, Judy A Trieu, Todd H Baron, Andrea Anderloni, Carlo Fabbri, Ilaria Tarantino, Lorenzo Fuccio","doi":"10.1097/eus.0000000000000108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (dMBO) needing biliary drainage (BD) undergo ERCP as a first approach. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is now accepted as a rescue alternative for the palliation of jaundice in those patients with dMBO who fail ERCP and cannot undergo EUS-BD. This is a systematic review with meta-analysis for evaluating the efficacy and safety of EUS-GBD in this scenario. A comprehensive search through the main database platforms was conducted to May 2024. Pooled estimates were obtained using a fixed-effects model with the generic inverse variance method. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS). Heterogeneity was evaluated with <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic. Clinical success, adverse events (AEs) rate, and reintervention rate were the main outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Eight studies including 183 patients were identified. Pooled clinical success was 89% (95% CI, 84%-93%). The pooled clinical success of full-text publication was 88% (95% CI, 83%-93%; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%). Reintervention rate was 8% (95% CI, 4%-12%; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%). The overall AE rate was 10% (95% CI, 6%-15%; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%). The NOS allocated moderate quality in 7 studies. In conclusion, our findings confirm that EUS-GBD in dMBO is a feasible, effective, and safe technique as rescue therapy after failure of ERCP or EUS-BD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11577,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","volume":"14 2","pages":"41-47"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000108","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (dMBO) needing biliary drainage (BD) undergo ERCP as a first approach. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is now accepted as a rescue alternative for the palliation of jaundice in those patients with dMBO who fail ERCP and cannot undergo EUS-BD. This is a systematic review with meta-analysis for evaluating the efficacy and safety of EUS-GBD in this scenario. A comprehensive search through the main database platforms was conducted to May 2024. Pooled estimates were obtained using a fixed-effects model with the generic inverse variance method. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS). Heterogeneity was evaluated with I 2 statistic. Clinical success, adverse events (AEs) rate, and reintervention rate were the main outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Eight studies including 183 patients were identified. Pooled clinical success was 89% (95% CI, 84%-93%). The pooled clinical success of full-text publication was 88% (95% CI, 83%-93%; I 2 = 0%). Reintervention rate was 8% (95% CI, 4%-12%; I 2 = 0%). The overall AE rate was 10% (95% CI, 6%-15%; I 2 = 0%). The NOS allocated moderate quality in 7 studies. In conclusion, our findings confirm that EUS-GBD in dMBO is a feasible, effective, and safe technique as rescue therapy after failure of ERCP or EUS-BD.

eus引导下的胆囊引流术作为远端恶性胆道梗阻的抢救:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
远端恶性胆道梗阻(dMBO)需要胆道引流(BD)的患者接受ERCP作为第一途径。eus引导下的胆囊引流术(EUS-GBD)现在被认为是缓解那些ERCP失败且不能接受EUS-BD的dMBO患者黄疸的一种替代方案。这是一项系统综述和荟萃分析,评估EUS-GBD在这种情况下的疗效和安全性。通过主要数据库平台进行全面检索,直至2024年5月。采用固定效应模型和通用逆方差法进行合并估计。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表(NOS)评价研究质量。采用i2统计量评价异质性。临床成功率、不良事件(ae)率和再干预率是主要观察指标。还进行了敏感性分析。纳入了8项研究,包括183名患者。合并临床成功率为89% (95% CI, 84%-93%)。全文发表的临床总成功率为88% (95% CI, 83%-93%;i2 = 0%)。再干预率为8% (95% CI, 4%-12%;i2 = 0%)。总AE率为10% (95% CI, 6%-15%;i2 = 0%)。7项研究的NOS评分为中等质量。总之,我们的研究结果证实了EUS-GBD在dMBO中作为ERCP或EUS-BD失败后的抢救治疗是一种可行、有效和安全的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Endoscopic Ultrasound, a publication of Euro-EUS Scientific Committee, Asia-Pacific EUS Task Force and Latin American Chapter of EUS, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Quarterly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.eusjournal.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal does not charge for submission, processing or publication of manuscripts and even for color reproduction of photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信