Molecular detection of pathogens in an equine fever diagnostic panel: 2019-2023.

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Toby L Pinn-Woodcock, Melissa S Aprea, Manigandan Lejeune, Joy E Tomlinson
{"title":"Molecular detection of pathogens in an equine fever diagnostic panel: 2019-2023.","authors":"Toby L Pinn-Woodcock, Melissa S Aprea, Manigandan Lejeune, Joy E Tomlinson","doi":"10.1111/evj.14527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A common diagnostic approach for febrile horses is to test for a panel of potential pathogens. Panels are curated by expert opinion and vary between diagnostic laboratories.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report the results of a newly developed equine fever diagnostic panel (EFDP) between 2019 and 2023 and evaluate the frequency of positive results.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective descriptive study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The EFDP requires submission of whole blood, nasal swab, and faecal samples, and includes PCR tests for 12 pathogens that can present as fever without localising signs of illness or infection. Submission metadata and results of all submissions with EFDP performed between July 2019 and April 2023 were tabulated. Submissions were excluded if horses were <1 year old or any tests were cancelled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One or more pathogens were identified on the EFDP in 366/961 (38%) cases. The most common pathogens identified were Anaplasma phagocytophilum and beta coronavirus. Co-infections with 2 or 3 pathogens were identified in 48/366 (13%) positive panels. Ancillary testing detected Salmonella in 5/23 (22%) submissions.</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Clinical information regarding the cases was lacking. The majority of submissions originated from the northeastern United States, and results might not be generalisable to other geographic regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The panel was able to detect a possible causative agent in approximately a third of cases. Based on the results of ancillary testing and recent literature, Potomac Horse Fever PCR on faeces (in addition to whole blood) and Salmonella culture have been added to the EFDP as of November 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":11796,"journal":{"name":"Equine Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14527","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A common diagnostic approach for febrile horses is to test for a panel of potential pathogens. Panels are curated by expert opinion and vary between diagnostic laboratories.

Objectives: To report the results of a newly developed equine fever diagnostic panel (EFDP) between 2019 and 2023 and evaluate the frequency of positive results.

Study design: Retrospective descriptive study.

Methods: The EFDP requires submission of whole blood, nasal swab, and faecal samples, and includes PCR tests for 12 pathogens that can present as fever without localising signs of illness or infection. Submission metadata and results of all submissions with EFDP performed between July 2019 and April 2023 were tabulated. Submissions were excluded if horses were <1 year old or any tests were cancelled.

Results: One or more pathogens were identified on the EFDP in 366/961 (38%) cases. The most common pathogens identified were Anaplasma phagocytophilum and beta coronavirus. Co-infections with 2 or 3 pathogens were identified in 48/366 (13%) positive panels. Ancillary testing detected Salmonella in 5/23 (22%) submissions.

Main limitations: Clinical information regarding the cases was lacking. The majority of submissions originated from the northeastern United States, and results might not be generalisable to other geographic regions.

Conclusions: The panel was able to detect a possible causative agent in approximately a third of cases. Based on the results of ancillary testing and recent literature, Potomac Horse Fever PCR on faeces (in addition to whole blood) and Salmonella culture have been added to the EFDP as of November 2024.

2019-2023年马热诊断小组病原体的分子检测
背景:对发热马的常见诊断方法是检测一组潜在的病原体。小组由专家意见策划,并因诊断实验室而异。目的:报告2019年至2023年新开发的马热诊断小组(EFDP)的结果,并评估阳性结果的频率。研究设计:回顾性描述性研究。方法:EFDP要求提交全血、鼻拭子和粪便样本,并包括对12种病原体的PCR检测,这些病原体可能表现为发烧,但没有局部疾病或感染迹象。列出了2019年7月至2023年4月期间EFDP提交的所有提交的元数据和结果。结果:366/961例(38%)病例在EFDP上鉴定出一种或多种病原体。最常见的病原体是嗜吞噬细胞无原体和冠状病毒。48/366(13%)阳性组中发现了2或3种病原体的合并感染。辅助检测在5/23(22%)的申报中检测出沙门氏菌。主要局限性:缺乏病例的临床资料。大多数提交来自美国东北部,结果可能无法推广到其他地理区域。结论:该小组能够在大约三分之一的病例中检测到可能的病原体。根据辅助检测结果和最近的文献,截至2024年11月,已将粪便(除全血外)和沙门氏菌培养的波托马克马热PCR添加到EFDP中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Equine Veterinary Journal
Equine Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Equine Veterinary Journal publishes evidence to improve clinical practice or expand scientific knowledge underpinning equine veterinary medicine. This unrivalled international scientific journal is published 6 times per year, containing peer-reviewed articles with original and potentially important findings. Contributions are received from sources worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信