Effect of Oral Neuromuscular Training on Tracheostomy Decannulation and Swallowing Function in Patients with Severe Acquired Brain Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Melanie Blichfeldt, Mohit Kothari, Jesper Fabricius
{"title":"Effect of Oral Neuromuscular Training on Tracheostomy Decannulation and Swallowing Function in Patients with Severe Acquired Brain Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Melanie Blichfeldt, Mohit Kothari, Jesper Fabricius","doi":"10.1007/s00455-025-10837-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a lack of evidence on training modalities for improving swallowing function in tracheostomized patients. The objective was to investigate the effect of oral neuromuscular training on decannulation and swallowing function in tracheostomized patients with acquired brain injury. A pilot randomized controlled trial with 22 patients, 11 in the intervention group and 11 in the usual care group. Inclusion criteria were: ≥ 18 years, cuffed tracheostomy tube at admission for rehabilitation, and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS) ≥ 4 at admission. Primary outcome was days from baseline until decannulation. Secondary outcomes were swallowing function assessed with FEDSS, Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS), and the Yale pharyngeal residue scale (Yale scale) at baseline and following 4 weeks intervention. Participants in the two groups were comparable at baseline with regards to demographics and functional level. Difference in time until decannulation in the two groups was expressed with a hazard ratio of 1.40 (95%CI: 0.57; 3.43) in favour of the IQoro group. Swallowing function improved statistically significant in the usual care group on both PAS and Yale scale, whereas improvements in the IQoro group was only observed in FEDSS. Investigating between group differences, there was a statistically significant difference in pharyngeal residue assessed with the Yale Scale-pyriform sinus in favour of usual care (p = 0.018). Training with IQoro did not facilitate improvements in early decannulation or swallowing function compared to usual care. On the contrary, results showed less improvements in pharyngeal residue in the IQoro group compared with the usual care group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10837-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a lack of evidence on training modalities for improving swallowing function in tracheostomized patients. The objective was to investigate the effect of oral neuromuscular training on decannulation and swallowing function in tracheostomized patients with acquired brain injury. A pilot randomized controlled trial with 22 patients, 11 in the intervention group and 11 in the usual care group. Inclusion criteria were: ≥ 18 years, cuffed tracheostomy tube at admission for rehabilitation, and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS) ≥ 4 at admission. Primary outcome was days from baseline until decannulation. Secondary outcomes were swallowing function assessed with FEDSS, Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS), and the Yale pharyngeal residue scale (Yale scale) at baseline and following 4 weeks intervention. Participants in the two groups were comparable at baseline with regards to demographics and functional level. Difference in time until decannulation in the two groups was expressed with a hazard ratio of 1.40 (95%CI: 0.57; 3.43) in favour of the IQoro group. Swallowing function improved statistically significant in the usual care group on both PAS and Yale scale, whereas improvements in the IQoro group was only observed in FEDSS. Investigating between group differences, there was a statistically significant difference in pharyngeal residue assessed with the Yale Scale-pyriform sinus in favour of usual care (p = 0.018). Training with IQoro did not facilitate improvements in early decannulation or swallowing function compared to usual care. On the contrary, results showed less improvements in pharyngeal residue in the IQoro group compared with the usual care group.

口腔神经肌肉训练对重症后发性脑损伤患者气管切开术脱管及吞咽功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
在气管造口术患者中,关于改善吞咽功能的训练方式缺乏证据。目的是探讨口腔神经肌肉训练对后天性脑损伤气管造口术后患者脱管和吞咽功能的影响。随机对照试验22例,干预组11例,常规护理组11例。纳入标准为:年龄≥18岁,入院时气管造口管闭合进行康复治疗,入院时纤维内镜下吞咽困难严重程度评分(FEDSS)≥4。主要结局为从基线到撤除导管的天数。次要结局是在基线和干预4周后用FEDSS、穿透吸入量表(PAS)和耶鲁咽残留物量表(Yale Scale)评估吞咽功能。两组的参与者在人口统计学和功能水平方面具有可比性。两组患者离断管时间差异的危险比为1.40 (95%CI: 0.57;3.43)支持IQoro集团。常规护理组吞咽功能改善在PAS和Yale量表上均有统计学意义,而IQoro组仅在FEDSS中观察到改善。比较两组间的差异,采用耶鲁鳞片-梨状窦法评估咽部残留物的差异有统计学意义(p = 0.018)。与常规护理相比,IQoro训练不能促进早期脱管或吞咽功能的改善。相反,结果显示,与常规护理组相比,IQoro组咽残留物改善较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信