Comparison of Plasma/Serum Electrolyte and Metabolite Testing on Blood Gas ABL90 and Core Laboratory Cobas c501 Analyzers.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Vera Y Chen, Yu Chen
{"title":"Comparison of Plasma/Serum Electrolyte and Metabolite Testing on Blood Gas ABL90 and Core Laboratory Cobas c501 Analyzers.","authors":"Vera Y Chen, Yu Chen","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.241047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Core medical laboratory chemistry analyzers typically use plasma or serum for electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride) and metabolites (glucose, lactate, total carbon dioxide) testing, whereas blood gas analyzers use whole blood. The aim of this study was to compare electrolyte and metabolite results in plasma or serum sample type using blood gas analyzer ABL90 with those generated by a core laboratory Cobas c501 analyzer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One plasma separator tube and one serum separator tube were drawn from 53 apparently healthy individuals and outpatients. All samples were run on Roche Cobas c501 and were then run on Radiometer ABL90 analyzers for sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), chloride (Cl-), glucose (Glu), lactate, and total carbon dioxide (tCO2) parameters. Paired measurements between the ABL90 and Cobas c501 were compared, and their differences were assessed for statistical and clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Except for serum glucose, to which ABL90 showed no statistical difference (p = 0.226) compared to Cobas c501, ABL90 demonstrated statistical significance (p < 0.05) vs. c501 on all other plasma and serum parameters. However, most parameters on ABL90 differ insignificantly to those on c501, except Na+ and Cl-. ABL90 also demonstrated excellent correlations with c501 in glucose, lactate, K+, and plasma tCO2 (correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.95) and modest correlations in Na+ and Cl- (r between 0.71 - 0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ABL90 blood gas analyzer and c501 chemistry analyzer are comparable when comparing metabolite (glucose, lactate, and plasma tCO2) and electrolyte (K+) values on plasma/serum. Na+ and Cl- plasma/serum testing on ABL90 need further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"71 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.241047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Core medical laboratory chemistry analyzers typically use plasma or serum for electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride) and metabolites (glucose, lactate, total carbon dioxide) testing, whereas blood gas analyzers use whole blood. The aim of this study was to compare electrolyte and metabolite results in plasma or serum sample type using blood gas analyzer ABL90 with those generated by a core laboratory Cobas c501 analyzer.

Methods: One plasma separator tube and one serum separator tube were drawn from 53 apparently healthy individuals and outpatients. All samples were run on Roche Cobas c501 and were then run on Radiometer ABL90 analyzers for sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), chloride (Cl-), glucose (Glu), lactate, and total carbon dioxide (tCO2) parameters. Paired measurements between the ABL90 and Cobas c501 were compared, and their differences were assessed for statistical and clinical significance.

Results: Except for serum glucose, to which ABL90 showed no statistical difference (p = 0.226) compared to Cobas c501, ABL90 demonstrated statistical significance (p < 0.05) vs. c501 on all other plasma and serum parameters. However, most parameters on ABL90 differ insignificantly to those on c501, except Na+ and Cl-. ABL90 also demonstrated excellent correlations with c501 in glucose, lactate, K+, and plasma tCO2 (correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.95) and modest correlations in Na+ and Cl- (r between 0.71 - 0.80).

Conclusions: ABL90 blood gas analyzer and c501 chemistry analyzer are comparable when comparing metabolite (glucose, lactate, and plasma tCO2) and electrolyte (K+) values on plasma/serum. Na+ and Cl- plasma/serum testing on ABL90 need further research.

血浆/血清电解质和代谢物检测血气ABL90和Cobas c501分析仪的比较。
背景:核心医学实验室化学分析仪通常使用血浆或血清进行电解质(钠、钾、氯化物)和代谢物(葡萄糖、乳酸、总二氧化碳)测试,而血气分析仪使用全血。本研究的目的是比较使用血气分析仪ABL90和核心实验室Cobas c501分析仪产生的血浆或血清样品类型的电解质和代谢物结果。方法:从53例身体健康者和门诊患者中抽取血浆分离管和血清分离管各1根。所有样品在Roche Cobas c501上运行,然后在Radiometer ABL90分析仪上运行钠(Na+)、钾(K+)、氯(Cl-)、葡萄糖(Glu)、乳酸和总二氧化碳(tCO2)参数。比较ABL90和Cobas c501的成对测量值,并评估其差异的统计学和临床意义。结果:ABL90除血清葡萄糖与Cobas c501比较差异无统计学意义(p = 0.226)外,其他血浆及血清指标与Cobas c501比较均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。ABL90除Na+和Cl-外,其余参数与c501差异不显著。ABL90在葡萄糖、乳酸、K+和血浆tCO2中也与c501表现出极好的相关性(相关系数r≥0.95),在Na+和Cl-中也表现出适度的相关性(r在0.71 - 0.80之间)。结论:ABL90血气分析仪与c501化学分析仪在比较血浆/血清代谢产物(葡萄糖、乳酸、血浆tCO2)和电解质(K+)值时具有可比性。Na+和Cl-血浆/血清检测ABL90有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信