Analytical Verification and Method Comparison of the Maglumi X8 for Thyroid Function Tests.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Levent Deniz, Meltem Yardim, Hale Aral
{"title":"Analytical Verification and Method Comparison of the Maglumi X8 for Thyroid Function Tests.","authors":"Levent Deniz, Meltem Yardim, Hale Aral","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.241017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When transitioning to new analytical platforms, laboratories must assess the analytical performances of their methods. This study aimed to verify the precision and trueness of the Maglumi X8 device for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) tests and to compare its performance with that of the Advia Centaur XP system previously used in our laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Precision and trueness verifications for TSH and FT4 were performed using three levels of Bio-Rad Quality Control (QC) materials following the CLSI EP15-A3 guidelines. Each day consisted of one run with five replicates, resulting in 25 analyses performed using three levels of QC material over five days. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed for method comparison analysis, following the CLSI EP09c guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The repeatability coefficients of variation (CVs) of TSH for levels 1, 2, and 3 were 2.170, 1.945, and 2.567%, respectively, whereas the within-laboratory (WL) CVs were 2.720, 2.786, and 2.609%, respectively. The repeatability CVs of FT4 for levels 1, 2, and 3 were 3.262, 1.326, and 0.696%, respectively, whereas the WL CVs were 4.848, 4.309, and 4.879%, respectively. The bias or overall mean values obtained in the study for TSH and FT4 levels were within the verification targets. TSH levels were found to be lower on Maglumi X8 [1.770 (1.190 to 2.790)] than Centaur XP [1.975 (1.185 to 3.315)]. FT4 levels were found to be higher on Maglumi X8 [1.305 (1.200 to 1.450)] than Centaur XP [1.210 (1.090 to 1.460)]. The bias between the two methods obtained from the Bland-Altman analysis for TSH and FT4 was -3.76% and 6.68%, respectively. Although the calculated bias for TSH fell within the desirable targets based on biological variation, FT4 did not meet these targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The precision and trueness verification results for TSH and FT4 demonstrated acceptable performance under the CLSI EP15-A3. TSH results between the two analyzers were consistent and can be transferred; FT4 results from Maglumi X8 require careful interpretation and may need harmonization and standardization due to the observed bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"71 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.241017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When transitioning to new analytical platforms, laboratories must assess the analytical performances of their methods. This study aimed to verify the precision and trueness of the Maglumi X8 device for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) tests and to compare its performance with that of the Advia Centaur XP system previously used in our laboratory.

Methods: Precision and trueness verifications for TSH and FT4 were performed using three levels of Bio-Rad Quality Control (QC) materials following the CLSI EP15-A3 guidelines. Each day consisted of one run with five replicates, resulting in 25 analyses performed using three levels of QC material over five days. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed for method comparison analysis, following the CLSI EP09c guidelines.

Results: The repeatability coefficients of variation (CVs) of TSH for levels 1, 2, and 3 were 2.170, 1.945, and 2.567%, respectively, whereas the within-laboratory (WL) CVs were 2.720, 2.786, and 2.609%, respectively. The repeatability CVs of FT4 for levels 1, 2, and 3 were 3.262, 1.326, and 0.696%, respectively, whereas the WL CVs were 4.848, 4.309, and 4.879%, respectively. The bias or overall mean values obtained in the study for TSH and FT4 levels were within the verification targets. TSH levels were found to be lower on Maglumi X8 [1.770 (1.190 to 2.790)] than Centaur XP [1.975 (1.185 to 3.315)]. FT4 levels were found to be higher on Maglumi X8 [1.305 (1.200 to 1.450)] than Centaur XP [1.210 (1.090 to 1.460)]. The bias between the two methods obtained from the Bland-Altman analysis for TSH and FT4 was -3.76% and 6.68%, respectively. Although the calculated bias for TSH fell within the desirable targets based on biological variation, FT4 did not meet these targets.

Conclusions: The precision and trueness verification results for TSH and FT4 demonstrated acceptable performance under the CLSI EP15-A3. TSH results between the two analyzers were consistent and can be transferred; FT4 results from Maglumi X8 require careful interpretation and may need harmonization and standardization due to the observed bias.

Maglumi X8用于甲状腺功能检测的分析验证及方法比较。
背景:当过渡到新的分析平台时,实验室必须评估其方法的分析性能。本研究旨在验证Maglumi X8设备用于促甲状腺激素(TSH)和游离甲状腺素(FT4)检测的准确性和准确性,并将其与我们实验室先前使用的Advia Centaur XP系统的性能进行比较。方法:采用Bio-Rad质量控制(QC)材料,按照CLSI EP15-A3指南,对TSH和FT4进行精密度和准确度验证。每天包括5次重复,在5天内使用3种水平的QC材料进行25次分析。采用pass - bablok回归和Bland-Altman分析进行方法比较分析,遵循CLSI EP09c指南。结果:1、2、3水平TSH的重复性变异系数(cv)分别为2.170、1.945、2.567%,而实验室内(WL)的重复性变异系数(cv)分别为2.720、2.786、2.609%。FT4在水平1、水平2和水平3的重复性cv分别为3.262、1.326和0.696%,而WL的重复性cv分别为4.848、4.309和4.879%。研究中获得的TSH和FT4水平的偏差或总体平均值在验证目标范围内。Maglumi X8的TSH水平[1.770(1.190 ~ 2.790)]低于Centaur XP[1.975(1.185 ~ 3.315)]。发现Maglumi X8的FT4水平[1.305(1.200至1.450)]高于Centaur XP[1.210(1.090至1.460)]。Bland-Altman分析TSH和FT4的两种方法偏差分别为-3.76%和6.68%。尽管计算出的TSH偏差在基于生物变异的理想目标范围内,但FT4不符合这些目标。结论:在CLSI EP15-A3下,TSH和FT4的精密度和真实度验证结果可接受。两台分析仪之间的TSH结果一致,可以传递;来自Maglumi X8的FT4结果需要仔细解释,并且由于观察到的偏差可能需要协调和标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信