Agarose Gel Electrophoresis versus Capillary Zone Electrophoresis: a Comparative Analysis for Monoclonal Protein Detection in Blood.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Mael Padelli, Cyril Leven, Edouard Chichmanian
{"title":"Agarose Gel Electrophoresis versus Capillary Zone Electrophoresis: a Comparative Analysis for Monoclonal Protein Detection in Blood.","authors":"Mael Padelli, Cyril Leven, Edouard Chichmanian","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.241139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) is the first-line test for the diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies. While agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) has been the traditional gold standard, capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) offers potential advantages in terms of resolution and sensitivity. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of these two techniques in detecting monoclonal gammopathies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 10,909 adult patients without a prior diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy who underwent SPE between 2017 and 2019. All patients received both AGE using the HYDRASIS 2 SCAN (Sebia, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France) and CZE using the CAPILLARYS 2 instrument (Sebia). Additional laboratory tests, including immunofixation electrophoresis and free light chain quantification in serum and urine, were performed. The final diagnosis was established one year after the initial diagnostic workup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of AGE was 87.6% (95% confidence interval (CI: 86.9 - 88.2), with a specificity of 99.5%. In contrast, CZE demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.2% (CI: 93.8 - 94.6) and a specificity of 98.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CZE is a valuable tool for the diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies, offering improved sensitivity over AGE. However, CZE may struggle to detect certain monoclonal immunoglobulins due to their insolubility in the CZE buffer, leading to precipitation and undetected results on electrophoretic tracings, even at high serum levels. SPE should be used in conjunction with complementary tests to ensure comprehensive detection of monoclonal immunoglobulins.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"71 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.241139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) is the first-line test for the diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies. While agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) has been the traditional gold standard, capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) offers potential advantages in terms of resolution and sensitivity. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of these two techniques in detecting monoclonal gammopathies.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 10,909 adult patients without a prior diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy who underwent SPE between 2017 and 2019. All patients received both AGE using the HYDRASIS 2 SCAN (Sebia, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France) and CZE using the CAPILLARYS 2 instrument (Sebia). Additional laboratory tests, including immunofixation electrophoresis and free light chain quantification in serum and urine, were performed. The final diagnosis was established one year after the initial diagnostic workup.

Results: The sensitivity of AGE was 87.6% (95% confidence interval (CI: 86.9 - 88.2), with a specificity of 99.5%. In contrast, CZE demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.2% (CI: 93.8 - 94.6) and a specificity of 98.9%.

Conclusions: CZE is a valuable tool for the diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies, offering improved sensitivity over AGE. However, CZE may struggle to detect certain monoclonal immunoglobulins due to their insolubility in the CZE buffer, leading to precipitation and undetected results on electrophoretic tracings, even at high serum levels. SPE should be used in conjunction with complementary tests to ensure comprehensive detection of monoclonal immunoglobulins.

琼脂糖凝胶电泳与毛细管区带电泳:血液中单克隆蛋白检测的比较分析。
背景:血清蛋白电泳(SPE)是诊断单克隆伽玛病的一线检测方法。琼脂糖凝胶电泳(AGE)一直是传统的金标准,毛细管区带电泳(CZE)在分辨率和灵敏度方面具有潜在的优势。本研究旨在比较这两种技术在检测单克隆伽玛病中的诊断准确性。方法:对2017年至2019年期间接受SPE治疗的10909例未确诊单克隆γ病的成年患者进行回顾性研究。所有患者均使用HYDRASIS 2 SCAN (Sebia, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France)接受AGE,并使用CAPILLARYS 2仪器(Sebia)接受CZE。进行了其他实验室测试,包括免疫固定电泳和血清和尿液中的游离轻链定量。最终诊断是在初次诊断检查一年后确定的。结果:AGE的敏感性为87.6%(95%可信区间(CI: 86.9 ~ 88.2),特异性为99.5%。相比之下,CZE的敏感性为94.2% (CI: 93.8 - 94.6),特异性为98.9%。结论:CZE是诊断单克隆伽玛病的一种有价值的工具,与AGE相比具有更高的敏感性。然而,CZE可能难以检测某些单克隆免疫球蛋白,因为它们在CZE缓冲液中不溶性,导致沉淀和电泳示踪未检测结果,即使在高血清水平下也是如此。SPE应与补充试验结合使用,以确保单克隆免疫球蛋白的全面检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信