From blood drops to biomarkers: a scoping review of microsampling in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Amanda J Campbell, Nicolai B Palstrøm, Lars M Rasmussen, Jes S Lindholt, Hans C Beck
{"title":"From blood drops to biomarkers: a scoping review of microsampling in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.","authors":"Amanda J Campbell, Nicolai B Palstrøm, Lars M Rasmussen, Jes S Lindholt, Hans C Beck","doi":"10.1186/s12014-025-09540-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microsamples are simple blood sampling procedures utilizing small blood draws. Although microsamples are regularly used in some disciplines, proteomic analysis of these samples is an emerging field. Currently, it is unclear whether the quantitative precision and proteome coverage achieved in microsamples is comparable to plasma or serum. As a consequence, microsamples are not used in proteomics to the same degree as more traditional blood samples.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this scoping review was to report the applications of microsamples within clinical mass spectrometry-based proteomics. This was accomplished by describing both proof-of-concept and clinical proteomics research within this field, with an additional evaluation of the newest advances regarding clinical proteomics.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Original scientific literature was included where bottom-up mass spectrometry was used to analyze endogenous proteins from human microsamples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant publications were sourced through three scientific databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus) in addition to backward and forward citation searches through Scopus. Record screening was performed independently by two separate authors. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 209 records were screened for inclusion from database searches and 3157 records were screened from forward and backward citation searches, resulting in 64 eligible studies. An evaluation of proof-of-concept research within this field revealed that although microsamples are amenable to high-throughput proteomics using a variety of targeted and untargeted acquisition methods, quantification remained a relevant issue. Microsampling practices were heterogeneous, and no standard procedure existed for protein quantification. Clinical studies investigated protein expression in numerous disease or experimental groups, including hemoglobinopathies and immunodeficiency disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of microsamples is increasing within the proteomics field and these samples are amenable to standard bottom-up workflows. Although microsamples present a clear advantage in terms of sampling procedure, both the sample collection and quantification procedures remain to be standardized. However, there is an incentive to address the remaining issues, since microsampling would greatly reduce the resources necessary to sample large cohorts within clinical proteomics, a field that currently lacks large discovery and validation cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10468,"journal":{"name":"Clinical proteomics","volume":"22 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-025-09540-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Microsamples are simple blood sampling procedures utilizing small blood draws. Although microsamples are regularly used in some disciplines, proteomic analysis of these samples is an emerging field. Currently, it is unclear whether the quantitative precision and proteome coverage achieved in microsamples is comparable to plasma or serum. As a consequence, microsamples are not used in proteomics to the same degree as more traditional blood samples.

Objectives: The objective of this scoping review was to report the applications of microsamples within clinical mass spectrometry-based proteomics. This was accomplished by describing both proof-of-concept and clinical proteomics research within this field, with an additional evaluation of the newest advances regarding clinical proteomics.

Inclusion criteria: Original scientific literature was included where bottom-up mass spectrometry was used to analyze endogenous proteins from human microsamples.

Methods: Relevant publications were sourced through three scientific databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus) in addition to backward and forward citation searches through Scopus. Record screening was performed independently by two separate authors. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.

Results: A total of 209 records were screened for inclusion from database searches and 3157 records were screened from forward and backward citation searches, resulting in 64 eligible studies. An evaluation of proof-of-concept research within this field revealed that although microsamples are amenable to high-throughput proteomics using a variety of targeted and untargeted acquisition methods, quantification remained a relevant issue. Microsampling practices were heterogeneous, and no standard procedure existed for protein quantification. Clinical studies investigated protein expression in numerous disease or experimental groups, including hemoglobinopathies and immunodeficiency disorders.

Conclusion: The use of microsamples is increasing within the proteomics field and these samples are amenable to standard bottom-up workflows. Although microsamples present a clear advantage in terms of sampling procedure, both the sample collection and quantification procedures remain to be standardized. However, there is an incentive to address the remaining issues, since microsampling would greatly reduce the resources necessary to sample large cohorts within clinical proteomics, a field that currently lacks large discovery and validation cohorts.

从血滴到生物标记物:基于质谱的蛋白质组学微采样的范围审查。
背景:微样本是利用少量抽血的简单血液取样程序。虽然微样品在某些学科中经常使用,但这些样品的蛋白质组学分析是一个新兴领域。目前,尚不清楚在微样品中获得的定量精度和蛋白质组覆盖率是否可与血浆或血清相媲美。因此,微样本在蛋白质组学中的应用程度不如传统血液样本。目的:本综述的目的是报道微样本在基于临床质谱的蛋白质组学中的应用。这是通过描述该领域的概念验证和临床蛋白质组学研究,以及对临床蛋白质组学最新进展的额外评估来完成的。纳入标准:纳入使用自下而上质谱法分析人微样品内源性蛋白质的原始科学文献。方法:通过三个科学数据库(MEDLINE, EMBASE和Scopus)检索相关出版物,并通过Scopus进行前后引文检索。记录筛选由两个独立的作者独立进行。该评价按照系统评价和meta分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)指南进行。结果:共从数据库检索中筛选了209条记录,从正向和反向引文检索中筛选了3157条记录,得到64项符合条件的研究。对该领域概念验证研究的评估表明,尽管微样品适用于使用各种靶向和非靶向获取方法的高通量蛋白质组学,但量化仍然是一个相关问题。微采样实践是异质的,没有标准的程序存在于蛋白质定量。临床研究调查了许多疾病或实验组中的蛋白质表达,包括血红蛋白病和免疫缺陷疾病。结论:微样品在蛋白质组学领域的使用越来越多,这些样品符合标准的自下而上的工作流程。虽然微样品在采样程序方面具有明显的优势,但样品收集和定量程序仍有待标准化。然而,由于微采样将大大减少在临床蛋白质组学中对大型队列进行采样所需的资源,这是一个目前缺乏大型发现和验证队列的领域,因此有动力解决剩下的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical proteomics
Clinical proteomics BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
37
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Proteomics encompasses all aspects of translational proteomics. Special emphasis will be placed on the application of proteomic technology to all aspects of clinical research and molecular medicine. The journal is committed to rapid scientific review and timely publication of submitted manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信