Ductal stenting in a limited-resource set up: a single naive centre experience in Eastern India of 88 patients.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nurul Islam, Siddhartha Saha, Soumyadeep Biswas, Chandrasekhar Dey, Krishnendu Khan
{"title":"Ductal stenting in a limited-resource set up: a single naive centre experience in Eastern India of 88 patients.","authors":"Nurul Islam, Siddhartha Saha, Soumyadeep Biswas, Chandrasekhar Dey, Krishnendu Khan","doi":"10.1017/S104795112500174X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To enumerate the experience in different parameters, including demographic, anatomic, procedural, ICU care, and outcome of ductal stenting procedures in duct-dependent pulmonary circulation in a resource-limited setup.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Stenting the arterial duct emerged as an alternative to a variety of surgical interventions in the early 1990s. Ductal stenting in neonates with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation may maintain duct patency reliably for several months as an alternative to systemic-to-pulmonary shunts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review from a single centre with a developing paediatric cardiology unit and limited paediatric cardiac surgical scope. Eighty-nine symptomatic patients who needed stable ductal flow for adequate pulmonary circulation underwent the procedure from October 2018 to December 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had a procedural success rate of 98.8% (one case failed out of 89) and a successful discharge rate of 96.6% (85 discharged out of 88; 3 immediate mortalities). At the six-month follow-up, the success rate was 93% (6 mortalities in 88 patients). No patient underwent a rescue surgical shunt, but an elective Blalock-Taussig shunt was needed in 1 patient (1.1%). In the remaining 82 cases, 65 are now in follow-up, among them 22 already underwent single-ventricle palliation, and 8 underwent biventricular repair successfully.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ductal stenting is less invasive well-accepted alternative for first-stage palliation. Our focus in this study is to practice this even in resource-limited settings as an alternative to surgical shunts with good short- and mid-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9435,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in the Young","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in the Young","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S104795112500174X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To enumerate the experience in different parameters, including demographic, anatomic, procedural, ICU care, and outcome of ductal stenting procedures in duct-dependent pulmonary circulation in a resource-limited setup.

Background: Stenting the arterial duct emerged as an alternative to a variety of surgical interventions in the early 1990s. Ductal stenting in neonates with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation may maintain duct patency reliably for several months as an alternative to systemic-to-pulmonary shunts.

Methods: This is a retrospective review from a single centre with a developing paediatric cardiology unit and limited paediatric cardiac surgical scope. Eighty-nine symptomatic patients who needed stable ductal flow for adequate pulmonary circulation underwent the procedure from October 2018 to December 2022.

Results: We had a procedural success rate of 98.8% (one case failed out of 89) and a successful discharge rate of 96.6% (85 discharged out of 88; 3 immediate mortalities). At the six-month follow-up, the success rate was 93% (6 mortalities in 88 patients). No patient underwent a rescue surgical shunt, but an elective Blalock-Taussig shunt was needed in 1 patient (1.1%). In the remaining 82 cases, 65 are now in follow-up, among them 22 already underwent single-ventricle palliation, and 8 underwent biventricular repair successfully.

Conclusions: Ductal stenting is less invasive well-accepted alternative for first-stage palliation. Our focus in this study is to practice this even in resource-limited settings as an alternative to surgical shunts with good short- and mid-term outcomes.

在资源有限的情况下进行导管支架置入术:在印度东部的一个有88名患者的单纯中心经验。
目的:总结在资源有限的情况下,导管依赖性肺循环中导管支架术在人口统计学、解剖学、手术、ICU护理和结果等不同参数方面的经验。背景:在20世纪90年代早期,动脉导管支架置入作为一种替代多种手术干预的方法出现。导管支架置入术对于导管依赖肺循环的新生儿,可作为系统-肺分流的替代方法,可靠地维持导管通畅数月。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,来自一个发展中的儿科心脏病科和有限的儿科心脏手术范围的单一中心。从2018年10月到2022年12月,89名有症状的患者需要稳定的导管血流来维持足够的肺循环。结果:手术成功率为98.8%(89例失败1例),出院成功率为96.6%(88例出院85例;3例立即死亡)。在6个月的随访中,成功率为93%(88例患者中6例死亡)。没有患者接受了抢救性手术分流术,但有1例患者(1.1%)需要选择性Blalock-Taussig分流术。其余82例中,65例正在随访中,其中22例已行单脑室姑息治疗,8例成功行双脑室修复。结论:导管支架置入术是一种侵入性较小且被广泛接受的一期姑息治疗方法。我们在这项研究中的重点是在资源有限的环境中实践这种方法,作为外科分流的替代方法,具有良好的短期和中期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology in the Young
Cardiology in the Young 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
715
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology in the Young is devoted to cardiovascular issues affecting the young, and the older patient suffering the sequels of congenital heart disease, or other cardiac diseases acquired in childhood. The journal serves the interests of all professionals concerned with these topics. By design, the journal is international and multidisciplinary in its approach, and members of the editorial board take an active role in the its mission, helping to make it the essential journal in paediatric cardiology. All aspects of paediatric cardiology are covered within the journal. The content includes original articles, brief reports, editorials, reviews, and papers devoted to continuing professional development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信