Prognostic Impact of the Pathologic Response of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Preoperative Treatments.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-17 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17453-z
Hongwei Xu, Haili Zhang, Yani Liu, Haojun Wu, Bo Li, Kefei Chen, Yonggang Wei
{"title":"Prognostic Impact of the Pathologic Response of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Preoperative Treatments.","authors":"Hongwei Xu, Haili Zhang, Yani Liu, Haojun Wu, Bo Li, Kefei Chen, Yonggang Wei","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17453-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exhibits varying degrees of tumor regression after preoperative treatments. However, the relationship between a tumor residual and its impact on recurrence-free survival (RFS) remains poorly defined. This study aimed to assess the effect of pathologic response on RFS in HCC patients undergoing preoperative treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 400 patients with HCC who received preoperative treatments were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between tumor residual and RFS was assessed using the \"surv_cutpoint\" function in R software and further validated through Cox proportional hazards regression models, with the objective of identifying a cutoff value that was significantly associated with RFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall analysis showed that pathologic response significantly influenced postoperative recurrence when tumor residual of 15% or less was detected. Multivariate regression analysis found that the independent risk factors for RFS were pathologic satellite nodules (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.25; P = 0.047), microvascular invasion (HR, 1.72; 95% CI 1.16-2.55; P = 0007), and advanced tumor stage (HR, 1.60; 95% CI 1.05-2.44; P = 0.031). In contrast, an independent protective factor affecting RFS was found to be residual of 15% or less (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.26-0.63; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that RFS was significantly associated with a tumor residual cutoff value of 15% in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A, 20% in stage BCLC stage B, and 26% in stage BCLC stage C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that achieving tumor residual of 15% or less after liver resection significantly reduces postoperative recurrence rates for HCC patients treated with preoperative therapies. The effect of tumor regression on RFS varied according to tumor stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"5684-5693"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17453-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exhibits varying degrees of tumor regression after preoperative treatments. However, the relationship between a tumor residual and its impact on recurrence-free survival (RFS) remains poorly defined. This study aimed to assess the effect of pathologic response on RFS in HCC patients undergoing preoperative treatments.

Methods: Data from 400 patients with HCC who received preoperative treatments were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between tumor residual and RFS was assessed using the "surv_cutpoint" function in R software and further validated through Cox proportional hazards regression models, with the objective of identifying a cutoff value that was significantly associated with RFS.

Results: The overall analysis showed that pathologic response significantly influenced postoperative recurrence when tumor residual of 15% or less was detected. Multivariate regression analysis found that the independent risk factors for RFS were pathologic satellite nodules (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.25; P = 0.047), microvascular invasion (HR, 1.72; 95% CI 1.16-2.55; P = 0007), and advanced tumor stage (HR, 1.60; 95% CI 1.05-2.44; P = 0.031). In contrast, an independent protective factor affecting RFS was found to be residual of 15% or less (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.26-0.63; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that RFS was significantly associated with a tumor residual cutoff value of 15% in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A, 20% in stage BCLC stage B, and 26% in stage BCLC stage C.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that achieving tumor residual of 15% or less after liver resection significantly reduces postoperative recurrence rates for HCC patients treated with preoperative therapies. The effect of tumor regression on RFS varied according to tumor stages.

肝细胞癌术前治疗后病理反应对预后的影响。
背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)在术前治疗后表现出不同程度的肿瘤消退。然而,肿瘤残留与其对无复发生存(RFS)的影响之间的关系仍然不明确。本研究旨在评估术前治疗HCC患者病理反应对RFS的影响。方法:回顾性分析术前治疗的400例HCC患者的资料。使用R软件中的“surv_cutpoint”函数评估肿瘤残留与RFS之间的相关性,并通过Cox比例风险回归模型进一步验证,目的是确定与RFS显著相关的截止值。结果:综合分析发现,当肿瘤残留小于等于15%时,病理反应对术后复发有显著影响。多因素回归分析发现,RFS的独立危险因素为病理性卫星结节(危险比[HR], 1.56;95%置信区间[CI] 1.05-2.25;P = 0.047),微血管侵犯(HR, 1.72;95% ci 1.16-2.55;P = 0007),肿瘤分期晚期(HR, 1.60;95% ci 1.05-2.44;P = 0.031)。相比之下,发现影响RFS的独立保护因素为残余15%或更少(HR 0.41;95% ci 0.26-0.63;P < 0.001)。亚组分析显示,RFS与巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC) a期15%、BCLC B期20%、BCLC c期26%的肿瘤残留截止值显著相关。结论:本研究表明,肝切除术后达到15%或更低的肿瘤残留可显著降低术前治疗HCC患者的术后复发率。肿瘤消退对RFS的影响因肿瘤分期而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信