Machine learning algorithms for the clinical diagnosis of acute atypical asthma exacerbation.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/YUOT5902
Feng Ma, Weihua Zhu, Piping Jiang, Xuelian Bai, Wenya Li
{"title":"Machine learning algorithms for the clinical diagnosis of acute atypical asthma exacerbation.","authors":"Feng Ma, Weihua Zhu, Piping Jiang, Xuelian Bai, Wenya Li","doi":"10.62347/YUOT5902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a predictive model for the clinical diagnosis of acute atypical asthma attacks using machine learning algorithms and investigate the risk factors related to the diagnosis of atypical asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively collected data on characteristics, symptoms, general examinations, pulmonary functional tests, and FeNO results of patients in the Aerospace Center Hospital. Five machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting) were employed to select variables for predicting outpatient cases of atypical asthma exacerbation in routine practice. A predictive model for diagnosing atypical asthma exacerbation was then developed, optimized, and subjected to explanatory analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening, 214 cases were included, with 98 diagnosed with acute exacerbation of atypical asthma and 116 undiagnosed. All patients were randomly assigned into a training set (n=149) or a validation set (n=65) at a ratio of 7:3. The predictive capabilities of five models were evaluated in the validation set. This demonstrated that all models could effectively identify patients with acute exacerbation of atypical asthma; among them, Logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting achieved accuracies of 93.1%, and extreme gradient boosting reached 95.4%. The logistic regression model showed the best predictive performance. Model interpretation analysis revealed that FeNO, EOS, FEV1 variability, history of allergic rhinitis, and wheezing during acute attacks were significant risk factors for predicting acute exacerbations of atypical asthma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The application of machine learning methods for variable selection in predicting acute exacerbations of atypical asthma has shown promising results. FeNO, EOS, FEV1 variability, history of allergic rhinitis, and wheezing during acute episodes were crucial predictors of exacerbations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 4","pages":"2916-2926"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/YUOT5902","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop a predictive model for the clinical diagnosis of acute atypical asthma attacks using machine learning algorithms and investigate the risk factors related to the diagnosis of atypical asthma.

Methods: This study retrospectively collected data on characteristics, symptoms, general examinations, pulmonary functional tests, and FeNO results of patients in the Aerospace Center Hospital. Five machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting) were employed to select variables for predicting outpatient cases of atypical asthma exacerbation in routine practice. A predictive model for diagnosing atypical asthma exacerbation was then developed, optimized, and subjected to explanatory analysis.

Results: After screening, 214 cases were included, with 98 diagnosed with acute exacerbation of atypical asthma and 116 undiagnosed. All patients were randomly assigned into a training set (n=149) or a validation set (n=65) at a ratio of 7:3. The predictive capabilities of five models were evaluated in the validation set. This demonstrated that all models could effectively identify patients with acute exacerbation of atypical asthma; among them, Logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting achieved accuracies of 93.1%, and extreme gradient boosting reached 95.4%. The logistic regression model showed the best predictive performance. Model interpretation analysis revealed that FeNO, EOS, FEV1 variability, history of allergic rhinitis, and wheezing during acute attacks were significant risk factors for predicting acute exacerbations of atypical asthma.

Conclusions: The application of machine learning methods for variable selection in predicting acute exacerbations of atypical asthma has shown promising results. FeNO, EOS, FEV1 variability, history of allergic rhinitis, and wheezing during acute episodes were crucial predictors of exacerbations.

机器学习算法在急性非典型哮喘发作的临床诊断中的应用。
目的:利用机器学习算法建立急性非典型哮喘发作的临床诊断预测模型,探讨与非典型哮喘诊断相关的危险因素。方法:回顾性收集航空航天中心医院患者的特征、症状、一般检查、肺功能检查和FeNO结果。采用logistic回归、决策树、随机森林、支持向量机、极值梯度增强等5种机器学习算法选择变量,预测非典型哮喘急性发作门诊病例。诊断非典型哮喘恶化的预测模型随后被开发、优化并进行解释性分析。结果:经筛选,纳入214例患者,其中诊断为非典型哮喘急性加重98例,未确诊116例。所有患者按7:3的比例随机分配到训练集(n=149)或验证集(n=65)。在验证集中对五个模型的预测能力进行了评估。说明所有模型均能有效识别非典型哮喘急性加重患者;其中Logistic回归、随机森林和极端梯度增强的准确率为93.1%,极端梯度增强的准确率为95.4%。逻辑回归模型的预测效果最好。模型解释分析显示,FeNO、EOS、FEV1变异性、变应性鼻炎史和急性发作时的喘息是预测非典型哮喘急性加重的重要危险因素。结论:应用机器学习方法进行变量选择预测非典型哮喘急性加重已显示出良好的效果。FeNO、EOS、FEV1变异性、过敏性鼻炎史和急性发作时的喘息是急性发作的重要预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信