Effect of dyadic coping-based couple psychological intervention on preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in ectopic pregnancy patients.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/ZCHN5990
Si Chen, Xinyu Yang, Lichan Song, Kejia Sha
{"title":"Effect of dyadic coping-based couple psychological intervention on preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in ectopic pregnancy patients.","authors":"Si Chen, Xinyu Yang, Lichan Song, Kejia Sha","doi":"10.62347/ZCHN5990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of dyadic coping-based couple psychological intervention on preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in ectopic pregnancy patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted with 100 ectopic pregnancy patients from Wuhan Children's Hospital between January 2022 and April 2024. Participants were divided into two groups: 50 in the control group (standard psychological intervention) and 50 in the observation group (dyadic coping-based psychological intervention). Outcomes were assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Data analysis was performed using SPSS 27.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation group exhibited significantly higher CD-RISC and lower STAI scores (both P < 0.001) compared to the control group. SDS scores were also lower in the observation group (P = 0.044). Postoperative VAS scores and SF-36 scores (both P < 0.05) were significantly improved in the observation group at days 1, 3, and 7. Complication rates were lower in the observation group (2% vs. 18%, P = 0.008). Correlation analysis revealed higher postoperative CD-RISC scores (rho = 0.411, P < 0.001) and lower S-AI (rho = -0.297, P = 0.003), T-AI scores (rho = -0.498, P < 0.001) and SDS scores (rho = -0.217, P = 0.030) were associated with better recovery. A higher complication rate was negatively correlated with recovery (rho = -0.267, P = 0.007), while better physical functioning (PF) (rho = 0.227, P = 0.023) was positively correlated with recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dyadic coping-based couple psychological intervention reduces preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in ectopic pregnancy patients, enhances psychological resilience, and improves quality of life, fostering better health outcome and recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 4","pages":"2642-2653"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/ZCHN5990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of dyadic coping-based couple psychological intervention on preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in ectopic pregnancy patients.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with 100 ectopic pregnancy patients from Wuhan Children's Hospital between January 2022 and April 2024. Participants were divided into two groups: 50 in the control group (standard psychological intervention) and 50 in the observation group (dyadic coping-based psychological intervention). Outcomes were assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Data analysis was performed using SPSS 27.0.

Results: The observation group exhibited significantly higher CD-RISC and lower STAI scores (both P < 0.001) compared to the control group. SDS scores were also lower in the observation group (P = 0.044). Postoperative VAS scores and SF-36 scores (both P < 0.05) were significantly improved in the observation group at days 1, 3, and 7. Complication rates were lower in the observation group (2% vs. 18%, P = 0.008). Correlation analysis revealed higher postoperative CD-RISC scores (rho = 0.411, P < 0.001) and lower S-AI (rho = -0.297, P = 0.003), T-AI scores (rho = -0.498, P < 0.001) and SDS scores (rho = -0.217, P = 0.030) were associated with better recovery. A higher complication rate was negatively correlated with recovery (rho = -0.267, P = 0.007), while better physical functioning (PF) (rho = 0.227, P = 0.023) was positively correlated with recovery.

Conclusion: Dyadic coping-based couple psychological intervention reduces preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in ectopic pregnancy patients, enhances psychological resilience, and improves quality of life, fostering better health outcome and recovery.

二元应对型夫妻心理干预对异位妊娠患者术前焦虑及术后疼痛的影响。
目的:探讨二元应对型夫妻心理干预对异位妊娠患者术前焦虑和术后疼痛的影响。方法:对武汉市儿童医院2022年1月至2024年4月间收治的100例异位妊娠患者进行回顾性研究。参与者分为两组:对照组50人(标准心理干预)和观察组50人(二元应对型心理干预)。结果采用状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)、康纳-戴维森弹性量表(CD-RISC)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和SF-36量表进行评估。数据分析采用SPSS 27.0软件。结果:观察组CD-RISC评分显著高于对照组,STAI评分显著低于对照组(P < 0.001)。观察组患者SDS评分也低于对照组(P = 0.044)。观察组患者术后第1、3、7天VAS评分和SF-36评分均显著提高(P均< 0.05)。观察组并发症发生率较低(2% vs. 18%, P = 0.008)。相关分析显示术后CD-RISC评分(rho = 0.411, P < 0.001)、S-AI评分(rho = -0.297, P = 0.003)、T-AI评分(rho = -0.498, P < 0.001)和SDS评分(rho = -0.217, P = 0.030)较高的患者恢复较好。较高的并发症发生率与康复呈负相关(rho = -0.267, P = 0.007),较好的身体功能(PF)与康复呈正相关(rho = 0.227, P = 0.023)。结论:二元应对型夫妻心理干预可减轻异位妊娠患者术前焦虑和术后疼痛,增强心理弹性,改善生活质量,促进健康结局和康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信