Impact of a Web-Based Decision Aid on Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patients' Engagement in Breast Surgery Decision-Making: Stepped-Wedge Clinical Trial (Alliance-A231701CD).

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-17 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17452-0
Jessica R Schumacher, Bret M Hanlon, David Zahrieh, Paul J Rathouz, Jennifer L Tucholka, Grace McKinney, Angelina D Tan, Catherine R Breuer, Lisa Bailey, Anna M Higham, Julie S Wecsler, Alicia H Arnold, Anthony J Froix, Scott Dull, Andrea M Abbott, Stephanie G Fine, Kandace P McGuire, Anna S Seydel, Patricia McNamara, Selina Chow, Heather B Neuman
{"title":"Impact of a Web-Based Decision Aid on Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patients' Engagement in Breast Surgery Decision-Making: Stepped-Wedge Clinical Trial (Alliance-A231701CD).","authors":"Jessica R Schumacher, Bret M Hanlon, David Zahrieh, Paul J Rathouz, Jennifer L Tucholka, Grace McKinney, Angelina D Tan, Catherine R Breuer, Lisa Bailey, Anna M Higham, Julie S Wecsler, Alicia H Arnold, Anthony J Froix, Scott Dull, Andrea M Abbott, Stephanie G Fine, Kandace P McGuire, Anna S Seydel, Patricia McNamara, Selina Chow, Heather B Neuman","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17452-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decision aids (DAs) may increase engagement in decision-making by addressing barriers that disproportionately impact socioeconomically disadvantaged patients. The impact of a breast cancer surgery DA on increasing patient engagement in decision-making was tested in clinics serving a high proportion of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A stepped-wedge trial was conducted with 10 National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program clinics (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, June 2019 to December 2021). The clinics were randomized to time of transition from usual care (UC) to delivery of a web-based DA. Patients with stages 0-3 breast cancer eligible for surgery provided consent before a surgical consultation. Engagement was measured by Patient's Self-Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5, follow-up survey) and count of Active Patient Behaviors (audio-recorded consultation). Intervention effects were tested with linear mixed-effects models, accounting for surgeon and clinic-level clustering, time, and enrollment after COVID. Heterogeneity of treatment effect by socioeconomic disadvantage (using the Area Deprivation Index) was assessed with an interaction term.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study enrolled 576 patients, and 44 % (136/309) of the patients reviewed the DA. No significant difference in engagement was observed between DA and UC for PEPPI-5 (- 0.8; 95 % CI, - 2.1-0.6; p = 0.260) or Active Patient Behaviors (2.5; 95 % CI, - 4.1-9.2; p = 0.456). No heterogeneity of treatment effect was observed. Socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with fewer Active Patient Behaviors (- 5.9; 95 % CI, - 0.6-- 1.2; p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This trial conducted in clinics that serve diverse populations, observed no significant relationship between a web-based DA and patient engagement. Future analyses will explore DA implementation, characteristics of patients who reviewed the DA, and persistent barriers to engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"5540-5550"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17452-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Decision aids (DAs) may increase engagement in decision-making by addressing barriers that disproportionately impact socioeconomically disadvantaged patients. The impact of a breast cancer surgery DA on increasing patient engagement in decision-making was tested in clinics serving a high proportion of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.

Methods: A stepped-wedge trial was conducted with 10 National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program clinics (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, June 2019 to December 2021). The clinics were randomized to time of transition from usual care (UC) to delivery of a web-based DA. Patients with stages 0-3 breast cancer eligible for surgery provided consent before a surgical consultation. Engagement was measured by Patient's Self-Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5, follow-up survey) and count of Active Patient Behaviors (audio-recorded consultation). Intervention effects were tested with linear mixed-effects models, accounting for surgeon and clinic-level clustering, time, and enrollment after COVID. Heterogeneity of treatment effect by socioeconomic disadvantage (using the Area Deprivation Index) was assessed with an interaction term.

Results: The study enrolled 576 patients, and 44 % (136/309) of the patients reviewed the DA. No significant difference in engagement was observed between DA and UC for PEPPI-5 (- 0.8; 95 % CI, - 2.1-0.6; p = 0.260) or Active Patient Behaviors (2.5; 95 % CI, - 4.1-9.2; p = 0.456). No heterogeneity of treatment effect was observed. Socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with fewer Active Patient Behaviors (- 5.9; 95 % CI, - 0.6-- 1.2; p = 0.013).

Conclusion: This trial conducted in clinics that serve diverse populations, observed no significant relationship between a web-based DA and patient engagement. Future analyses will explore DA implementation, characteristics of patients who reviewed the DA, and persistent barriers to engagement.

基于网络的决策辅助对社会经济弱势患者参与乳房手术决策的影响:阶梯形临床试验(Alliance-A231701CD)。
背景:决策辅助(DAs)可以通过解决不成比例地影响社会经济弱势患者的障碍来增加决策的参与。在为高比例社会经济弱势患者服务的诊所中,对乳腺癌手术DA对提高患者参与决策的影响进行了测试。方法:在10个国家癌症研究所社区肿瘤研究项目诊所(肿瘤临床试验联盟,2019年6月至2021年12月)进行了一项楔形试验。这些诊所被随机分配到从常规护理(UC)到提供基于网络的DA的过渡时间。符合手术条件的0-3期乳腺癌患者在手术会诊前提供同意。通过患者医患互动中的自我效能感(PEPPI-5,随访调查)和患者积极行为计数(录音咨询)来衡量参与程度。采用线性混合效应模型检验干预效果,考虑了外科医生和临床水平的聚类、时间和COVID后的入组情况。社会经济劣势(使用面积剥夺指数)对治疗效果的异质性进行了相互作用项评估。结果:该研究纳入了576例患者,44%(136/309)的患者回顾了DA。DA和UC在PEPPI-5的接合度上没有显著差异(- 0.8;95% ci, - 2.1-0.6;p = 0.260)或积极患者行为(2.5;95% ci, - 4.1-9.2;P = 0.456)。治疗效果无异质性。社会经济劣势与较少的积极患者行为相关(- 5.9;95% ci, - 0.6—1.2;P = 0.013)。结论:该试验在服务不同人群的诊所进行,观察到基于网络的DA与患者参与之间没有显著关系。未来的分析将探讨DA的实施,回顾DA的患者的特征,以及参与的持续障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信