Risk factors, prenatal diagnosis, and outcome of posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders in patients with placenta previa or low-lying placenta: A multicenter study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
{"title":"Risk factors, prenatal diagnosis, and outcome of posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders in patients with placenta previa or low-lying placenta: A multicenter study.","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/aogs.15132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders occur when the definitive placenta develops within the uterus scar area. Although classically PAS develops in the anterior wall of the uterus mainly, it can also develop in the posterior uterine wall. The aim of this study was to report the risk factors, diagnostic accuracy of prenatal imaging, and surgical outcome of pregnancies complicated by posterior PAS in women with placenta previa or low-lying.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective study involving 16 referral hospitals in Italy (ADoPAD Study). Inclusion criteria were patients with a posterior low-lying placenta (<20 mm from the internal cervical os) or placenta previa (covering the os), aged ≥18 years undergoing ultrasound assessment at ≥26<sup>+0</sup> weeks of gestation. The reference standard for PAS was represented by the failure of placental separation at delivery or by pathological analysis. The primary aim was to report the risk factors associated with the occurrence of posterior PAS. The secondary aims were to evaluate the ability of prenatal ultrasound in detecting posterior PAS and to report its surgical outcome compared to posterior placental previa or low-lying with no PAS and anterior PAS, respectively, and in patients with a prenatal compared to post-natal diagnosis. Univariate and diagnostic accuracy analyses were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>258 patients were included in the analysis. Posterior PAS occurred in 8.1% (n = 21; 95% CI 5.4-12.1) of patients. There was a higher incidence of one or more prior CS (62% vs. 21%, p < 0.001) and myomectomy with uterine penetration (71.0% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001) in patients with posterior PAS compared to those with no PAS. In patients with posterior PAS, placenta accreta occurred in 66.67% (14/21), increta in 23.81% (5/21), and percreta in 9.52% (2/21) of cases. Posterior PAS confirmed at birth was diagnosed prenatally by ultrasound in 62% (13/21) of cases. When comparing anterior with posterior PAS, patients with anterior PAS were more likely to have a prior CS (82% vs. 62%; p = 0.0049) and placenta percreta (54% vs. 10%; p < 0.001). Finally, the need for hysterectomy (89% vs. 48%; p < 0.001) was higher, while that of balloon tamponade insertion was lower (17% vs. 52%; p = 0.001) in patients with anterior compared to posterior PAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prior uterine surgery in patients with placenta previa or low-lying represents the commonest risk factors for posterior PAS. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting posterior PAS is lower in cases with posterior compared to anterior PAS. Finally, in referral centers, posterior PAS disorders were associated with a lower risk of hysterectomy compared to anterior PAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders occur when the definitive placenta develops within the uterus scar area. Although classically PAS develops in the anterior wall of the uterus mainly, it can also develop in the posterior uterine wall. The aim of this study was to report the risk factors, diagnostic accuracy of prenatal imaging, and surgical outcome of pregnancies complicated by posterior PAS in women with placenta previa or low-lying.

Material and methods: Secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective study involving 16 referral hospitals in Italy (ADoPAD Study). Inclusion criteria were patients with a posterior low-lying placenta (<20 mm from the internal cervical os) or placenta previa (covering the os), aged ≥18 years undergoing ultrasound assessment at ≥26+0 weeks of gestation. The reference standard for PAS was represented by the failure of placental separation at delivery or by pathological analysis. The primary aim was to report the risk factors associated with the occurrence of posterior PAS. The secondary aims were to evaluate the ability of prenatal ultrasound in detecting posterior PAS and to report its surgical outcome compared to posterior placental previa or low-lying with no PAS and anterior PAS, respectively, and in patients with a prenatal compared to post-natal diagnosis. Univariate and diagnostic accuracy analyses were used to analyze the data.

Results: 258 patients were included in the analysis. Posterior PAS occurred in 8.1% (n = 21; 95% CI 5.4-12.1) of patients. There was a higher incidence of one or more prior CS (62% vs. 21%, p < 0.001) and myomectomy with uterine penetration (71.0% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001) in patients with posterior PAS compared to those with no PAS. In patients with posterior PAS, placenta accreta occurred in 66.67% (14/21), increta in 23.81% (5/21), and percreta in 9.52% (2/21) of cases. Posterior PAS confirmed at birth was diagnosed prenatally by ultrasound in 62% (13/21) of cases. When comparing anterior with posterior PAS, patients with anterior PAS were more likely to have a prior CS (82% vs. 62%; p = 0.0049) and placenta percreta (54% vs. 10%; p < 0.001). Finally, the need for hysterectomy (89% vs. 48%; p < 0.001) was higher, while that of balloon tamponade insertion was lower (17% vs. 52%; p = 0.001) in patients with anterior compared to posterior PAS.

Conclusions: Prior uterine surgery in patients with placenta previa or low-lying represents the commonest risk factors for posterior PAS. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting posterior PAS is lower in cases with posterior compared to anterior PAS. Finally, in referral centers, posterior PAS disorders were associated with a lower risk of hysterectomy compared to anterior PAS.

前置胎盘或低位胎盘患者后胎盘增生谱系障碍的危险因素、产前诊断和预后:一项多中心研究
胎盘增生谱(PAS)障碍发生在子宫瘢痕区最终胎盘发育时。虽然典型的PAS主要发生在子宫前壁,但它也可以发生在子宫后壁。本研究的目的是报道前置胎盘或低胎盘女性合并后路PAS妊娠的危险因素、产前影像学诊断的准确性和手术结果。材料和方法:一项涉及意大利16家转诊医院的多中心前瞻性研究(ADoPAD研究)的二次分析。纳入标准为妊娠0周以上的后置低胎盘患者。PAS的参考标准是分娩时胎盘分离失败或病理分析。主要目的是报告与后路PAS发生相关的危险因素。次要目的是评估产前超声检测后胎盘前置胎盘的能力,并分别报告其与后胎盘前置胎盘或无前胎盘前置胎盘的低洼胎盘和前胎盘前置胎盘的手术结果,以及产前诊断与产后诊断的患者的手术结果。采用单因素分析和诊断准确性分析对数据进行分析。结果:258例患者纳入分析。后路PAS发生率为8.1% (n = 21;95% CI(5.4-12.1)。一种或多种既往子宫内膜炎的发生率较高(62% vs. 21%, p)。结论:既往子宫手术对前置胎盘或低胎盘的患者是后路子宫内膜炎最常见的危险因素。超声在检测后路PAS时的诊断准确性较后路PAS低。最后,在转诊中心,后路PAS疾病与前路PAS相比,子宫切除术的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信