Association Between Marital/Partner Status and Patient-reported Outcomes in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cenjing Zhu, Phoebe M Tran, Erica C Leifheit, Erica S Spatz, Rachel P Dreyer, Kate Nyhan, Shi-Yi Wang, Patricia N E Roberson, Larry B Goldstein, Judith H Lichtman
{"title":"Association Between Marital/Partner Status and Patient-reported Outcomes in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Cenjing Zhu, Phoebe M Tran, Erica C Leifheit, Erica S Spatz, Rachel P Dreyer, Kate Nyhan, Shi-Yi Wang, Patricia N E Roberson, Larry B Goldstein, Judith H Lichtman","doi":"10.1159/000546413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extent to which marital/partner status affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in stroke patients varies among reported studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and PsycINFO) were searched from inception to April 15, 2024. Peer-reviewed studies that reported the independent association of marital/partner status with defined PROMs for patients who had a stroke were eligible for inclusion. Results for eligible studies were classified into four pre-defined outcome domains (health-related quality of life [HRQoL], functional status, symptoms, and personal recovery outcomes). Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and data were synthesized by outcome domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 51 studies (n=552,943 participants), of which 10 were included in meta-analyses. Being married/partnered was associated with a lower likelihood of post-stroke depression (pooled OR, 0.62 [95%CI, 0.43 to 0.89], I2=0%) and anxiety (pooled OR, 0.32 [95%CI, 0.21 to 0.49], I2=0%) but was not associated with HRQoL (mixed and insignificant association in physical and mental domains). Qualitative synthesis further suggested that most studies supported better functional and personal recovery outcomes for stroke patients who were married/partnered compared with those who were unpartnered. Data were insufficient to determine whether the association of partner status varied by the sex of the stroke patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the importance of the influence of marital/partner status on PROMs among stroke patients for mental health, but not for HRQoL. Future research should aim to harmonize assessments and standardize reporting to enhance further investigation of these associations, determine whether there are differences by sex, and further explore the association between marital/partner status and poststroke functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The extent to which marital/partner status affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in stroke patients varies among reported studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify this relationship.

Methods: Five databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and PsycINFO) were searched from inception to April 15, 2024. Peer-reviewed studies that reported the independent association of marital/partner status with defined PROMs for patients who had a stroke were eligible for inclusion. Results for eligible studies were classified into four pre-defined outcome domains (health-related quality of life [HRQoL], functional status, symptoms, and personal recovery outcomes). Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and data were synthesized by outcome domains.

Results: We identified 51 studies (n=552,943 participants), of which 10 were included in meta-analyses. Being married/partnered was associated with a lower likelihood of post-stroke depression (pooled OR, 0.62 [95%CI, 0.43 to 0.89], I2=0%) and anxiety (pooled OR, 0.32 [95%CI, 0.21 to 0.49], I2=0%) but was not associated with HRQoL (mixed and insignificant association in physical and mental domains). Qualitative synthesis further suggested that most studies supported better functional and personal recovery outcomes for stroke patients who were married/partnered compared with those who were unpartnered. Data were insufficient to determine whether the association of partner status varied by the sex of the stroke patient.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of the influence of marital/partner status on PROMs among stroke patients for mental health, but not for HRQoL. Future research should aim to harmonize assessments and standardize reporting to enhance further investigation of these associations, determine whether there are differences by sex, and further explore the association between marital/partner status and poststroke functional outcomes.

脑卒中患者婚姻/伴侣状况与患者报告预后之间的关系:一项系统综述。
背景:在不同的研究中,婚姻/伴侣状态对脑卒中患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)的影响程度有所不同。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析来阐明这种关系。方法:检索Medline、Web of Science、Scopus、EMBASE、PsycINFO 5个数据库,检索时间为建站至2024年4月15日。同行评议的研究报告了婚姻/伴侣状态与卒中患者定义的PROMs的独立关联,符合纳入条件。符合条件的研究结果被分为四个预定义的结果域(健康相关生活质量[HRQoL]、功能状态、症状和个人恢复结果)。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量,并根据结果域综合数据。结果:我们确定了51项研究(n=552,943名参与者),其中10项纳入meta分析。已婚/有伴侣与卒中后抑郁(合并OR, 0.62 [95%CI, 0.43至0.89],I2=0%)和焦虑(合并OR, 0.32 [95%CI, 0.21至0.49],I2=0%)的可能性较低相关,但与HRQoL无关(在身体和精神领域存在混合且不显著的关联)。定性综合进一步表明,大多数研究支持已婚/有伴侣的中风患者比无伴侣的中风患者有更好的功能和个人恢复结果。数据不足以确定伴侣状态的关联是否因中风患者的性别而异。结论:我们的研究结果强调了婚姻/伴侣状态对卒中患者PROMs心理健康的重要影响,而不是对HRQoL的重要影响。未来的研究应旨在协调评估和规范报告,以加强对这些关联的进一步调查,确定是否存在性别差异,并进一步探讨婚姻/伴侣状况与脑卒中后功能结局之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Cerebrovascular Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信