Pressure-Wire Guided Hybrid Branch Pulmonary Artery Band Placement for Palliation of Single Ventricle and Critical Congenital Cardiac Lesions.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jonathan Pacella, Bryan H Goldstein, Eiméar McGovern, Shabana Shahanavaz, Russel Hirsch, David Lehenbauer, David Winlaw, David L S Morales, Sarosh P Batlivala
{"title":"Pressure-Wire Guided Hybrid Branch Pulmonary Artery Band Placement for Palliation of Single Ventricle and Critical Congenital Cardiac Lesions.","authors":"Jonathan Pacella, Bryan H Goldstein, Eiméar McGovern, Shabana Shahanavaz, Russel Hirsch, David Lehenbauer, David Winlaw, David L S Morales, Sarosh P Batlivala","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historically, bilateral pulmonary artery band (PAB) placement was guided by pulmonary blood flow surrogates including systemic blood pressure (BP) and arterial saturation. These metrics alone may result in suboptimal bPAB placement. We perform a hybrid PAB (hPAB) procedure employing pressure-wire assessment to evaluate pulmonary hemodynamics and guide the procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients that underwent hybrid bPAB procedure between August 2015 and May 2022. Procedures involved main pulmonary artery (PA) angiography and selective PA pressure-wire assessment. Aortic pressure and arterial saturation were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients underwent hPAB procedure. Median procedure time was 190 min [range 122-480 min]. Ten patients underwent 15 total adjustments to a PA band, 6 (40%) based solely on pressure assessment with inappropriately low and non-pulsatile pressures. Five patients underwent 13 PA interventions after hPAB, 12 (92%) were transcatheter and 1 (8%) operative. Two patients underwent transcatheter angioplasty of a branch PA band in the interstage period while 4 underwent a total of 10 catheter-based PA interventions after the subsequent operation, at a median of 7 days [range 7-270 days] post-operatively. Two patients underwent PA stent implant. Branch PA Z-scores were normal at birth and remained normal at most recent follow-up for survivors (46 months), with final PA symmetry (smaller/larger PA area × 100) of 91% ± 9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pressure-wire data identified more patients with overly restrictive bands during hybrid bPAB procedures than traditional markers alone. Many survivors required future PA intervention, and all demonstrated appropriate bilateral PA growth and symmetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31595","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Historically, bilateral pulmonary artery band (PAB) placement was guided by pulmonary blood flow surrogates including systemic blood pressure (BP) and arterial saturation. These metrics alone may result in suboptimal bPAB placement. We perform a hybrid PAB (hPAB) procedure employing pressure-wire assessment to evaluate pulmonary hemodynamics and guide the procedure.

Methods: Single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients that underwent hybrid bPAB procedure between August 2015 and May 2022. Procedures involved main pulmonary artery (PA) angiography and selective PA pressure-wire assessment. Aortic pressure and arterial saturation were recorded.

Results: Twenty-three patients underwent hPAB procedure. Median procedure time was 190 min [range 122-480 min]. Ten patients underwent 15 total adjustments to a PA band, 6 (40%) based solely on pressure assessment with inappropriately low and non-pulsatile pressures. Five patients underwent 13 PA interventions after hPAB, 12 (92%) were transcatheter and 1 (8%) operative. Two patients underwent transcatheter angioplasty of a branch PA band in the interstage period while 4 underwent a total of 10 catheter-based PA interventions after the subsequent operation, at a median of 7 days [range 7-270 days] post-operatively. Two patients underwent PA stent implant. Branch PA Z-scores were normal at birth and remained normal at most recent follow-up for survivors (46 months), with final PA symmetry (smaller/larger PA area × 100) of 91% ± 9%.

Conclusions: Pressure-wire data identified more patients with overly restrictive bands during hybrid bPAB procedures than traditional markers alone. Many survivors required future PA intervention, and all demonstrated appropriate bilateral PA growth and symmetry.

压力丝引导混合型肺动脉支带置放治疗单心室及危重先天性心脏病变。
背景:历史上,双侧肺动脉带(PAB)放置是由肺血流替代物引导的,包括全身血压(BP)和动脉饱和度。这些指标本身可能会导致bPAB布局不理想。我们采用混合型PAB (hPAB)手术,采用压力线评估来评估肺血流动力学并指导手术。方法:对2015年8月至2022年5月期间连续接受混合型bPAB手术的患者进行单中心回顾性研究。手术包括肺动脉(PA)血管造影和选择性PA压力线评估。记录主动脉压和动脉饱和度。结果:23例患者行hPAB手术。手术时间中位数为190分钟[范围122-480分钟]。10例患者总共进行了15次PA带调整,6例(40%)仅基于压力评估,不适当的低压力和非脉动压力。5例患者在hPAB后接受了13次PA干预,12例(92%)经导管治疗,1例(8%)手术治疗。2例患者在期间期接受了经导管血管成形术,4例患者在术后共接受了10次导管式PA干预,中位时间为术后7天[范围7-270天]。2例患者行PA支架植入。分支PA z评分在出生时正常,在幸存者最近的随访(46个月)中保持正常,最终PA对称性(较小/较大的PA面积× 100)为91%±9%。结论:在混合型bPAB手术中,压力丝数据比单独使用传统标记物识别出更多的过度限制性带患者。许多幸存者需要未来的PA干预,所有人都表现出适当的双侧PA生长和对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信