Brazilian front-of-package nutrition labelling and food additives: an approach to identify ultra-processed food products.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Daniela Silva Canella, Ana Paula Bortoletto Martins, Mariana Ribeiro, Giovanna Calixto Andrade, Vanessa Dos Santos Pereira Montera, Laís Amaral Mais
{"title":"Brazilian front-of-package nutrition labelling and food additives: an approach to identify ultra-processed food products.","authors":"Daniela Silva Canella, Ana Paula Bortoletto Martins, Mariana Ribeiro, Giovanna Calixto Andrade, Vanessa Dos Santos Pereira Montera, Laís Amaral Mais","doi":"10.1017/S000711452500090X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to explore combinations of the Brazilian front-of-package nutrition labelling (FoPNL) (high in added sugar, saturated fat and sodium) and/or three specific food additives with cosmetic functions (colourings, flavourings and non-sugar sweeteners - NSS) in packaged foods and beverages marketed in Brazil. This approach intends to strengthen the identification of ultra-processed food products (UPFP) by consumers through the information available on their labels. A cross-sectional study was carried out using data from the list of ingredients and the nutrition facts panel on labels of processed foods and UPFP available in Brazilian supermarkets between April and July 2017, totalling 8,436 food items assessed, of which 84.0% were UPFP. Of the total, 62.7% of the UPFP would have the FoPNL and 65.1%, 37.9% and 12.9% had flavouring, colouring and NSS, respectively. Combining criteria for the FoPNL with any one of the three cosmetic additives analysed, 45.9% of the UPFP were identified, and when considering the presence of the FoPNL, flavouring, colouring or NSS, the identification increased to 89.9%. Results showed that the current FoPNL in Brazil does not facilitate the identification of UPFP. In this sense, labels that indicate the presence of food additives with cosmetic functions (which are UPFP markers) could be a public health strategy to reduce the consumption of UPFP. Currently, food labelling regulations in Brazil are not aligned with Brazilian Dietary Guidelines recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9257,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711452500090X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to explore combinations of the Brazilian front-of-package nutrition labelling (FoPNL) (high in added sugar, saturated fat and sodium) and/or three specific food additives with cosmetic functions (colourings, flavourings and non-sugar sweeteners - NSS) in packaged foods and beverages marketed in Brazil. This approach intends to strengthen the identification of ultra-processed food products (UPFP) by consumers through the information available on their labels. A cross-sectional study was carried out using data from the list of ingredients and the nutrition facts panel on labels of processed foods and UPFP available in Brazilian supermarkets between April and July 2017, totalling 8,436 food items assessed, of which 84.0% were UPFP. Of the total, 62.7% of the UPFP would have the FoPNL and 65.1%, 37.9% and 12.9% had flavouring, colouring and NSS, respectively. Combining criteria for the FoPNL with any one of the three cosmetic additives analysed, 45.9% of the UPFP were identified, and when considering the presence of the FoPNL, flavouring, colouring or NSS, the identification increased to 89.9%. Results showed that the current FoPNL in Brazil does not facilitate the identification of UPFP. In this sense, labels that indicate the presence of food additives with cosmetic functions (which are UPFP markers) could be a public health strategy to reduce the consumption of UPFP. Currently, food labelling regulations in Brazil are not aligned with Brazilian Dietary Guidelines recommendations.

巴西包装正面营养标签和食品添加剂:识别超加工食品的方法。
本研究旨在探索在巴西销售的包装食品和饮料中巴西包装前营养标签(FoPNL)(高添加糖、饱和脂肪和钠)和/或三种具有化妆品功能的特定食品添加剂(着色剂、调味剂和非糖甜味剂- NSS)的组合。该方法旨在通过标签上的信息加强消费者对超加工食品(UPFP)的识别。利用2017年4月至7月期间巴西超市中加工食品和UPFP标签上的成分清单和营养成分面板的数据进行了一项横断面研究,共评估了8,436种食品,其中84.0%为UPFP。其中,62.7%的UPFP含有FoPNL, 65.1%、37.9%和12.9%的UPFP分别含有调味剂、着色剂和NSS。将FoPNL的标准与三种化妆品添加剂中的任何一种相结合,鉴定出45.9%的UPFP,当考虑到FoPNL、调味剂、着色剂或NSS的存在时,鉴定率增加到89.9%。结果表明,目前巴西的FoPNL不便于UPFP的鉴定。从这个意义上说,表明存在具有化妆品功能的食品添加剂的标签(即UPFP标记)可能是减少UPFP消费的公共卫生策略。目前,巴西的食品标签法规与《巴西膳食指南》的建议不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Nutrition
British Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
740
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nutrition is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering research on human and clinical nutrition, animal nutrition and basic science as applied to nutrition. The Journal recognises the multidisciplinary nature of nutritional science and includes material from all of the specialities involved in nutrition research, including molecular and cell biology and nutritional genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信