Lessons From the Dissolution of Mexico's Information Commission

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Gregory Michener, Fernando Nieto Morales, Margaret Kwoka, María del Carmen Nava Polina
{"title":"Lessons From the Dissolution of Mexico's Information Commission","authors":"Gregory Michener,&nbsp;Fernando Nieto Morales,&nbsp;Margaret Kwoka,&nbsp;María del Carmen Nava Polina","doi":"10.1111/gove.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>A much-emulated information commission and a superstar within global transparency policy circles, Mexico's National Institute for Access to Information (the INAI) wielded practically unappealable decision-making power over public information across the entire Mexican federation. In November 2024, the populist Morena regime formally dissolved the INAI. Looking beyond the tired tale of populist backsliding, the INAI's demise offers key lessons about the vulnerability of transparency in the absence of adequate social and institutional embeddedness. While the INAI exceled at freeing information from the state, exposed abuses went unaccompanied by broader linked efforts at enforcement. Lesson: Integrate public transparency into broader policy agendas, especially those popularly associated with transparency's <i>raison d’être</i> (e.g., social, administrative, criminal justice). And while the INAI did make efforts to socialize the right to information, these lacked scale and arrived too late. Lesson: Engage citizens early, making transparency relevant to the problem-solving tasks of everyday civic life.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48056,"journal":{"name":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gove.70031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A much-emulated information commission and a superstar within global transparency policy circles, Mexico's National Institute for Access to Information (the INAI) wielded practically unappealable decision-making power over public information across the entire Mexican federation. In November 2024, the populist Morena regime formally dissolved the INAI. Looking beyond the tired tale of populist backsliding, the INAI's demise offers key lessons about the vulnerability of transparency in the absence of adequate social and institutional embeddedness. While the INAI exceled at freeing information from the state, exposed abuses went unaccompanied by broader linked efforts at enforcement. Lesson: Integrate public transparency into broader policy agendas, especially those popularly associated with transparency's raison d’être (e.g., social, administrative, criminal justice). And while the INAI did make efforts to socialize the right to information, these lacked scale and arrived too late. Lesson: Engage citizens early, making transparency relevant to the problem-solving tasks of everyday civic life.

墨西哥信息委员会解散的教训
墨西哥国家信息获取研究所(INAI)是一个备受效仿的信息委员会,也是全球透明政策圈中的超级明星,它对整个墨西哥联邦的公共信息拥有几乎无可上诉的决策权。2024年11月,民粹主义的Morena政权正式解散了INAI。抛开民粹主义倒退的陈词滥调,INAI的消亡提供了重要的教训,说明在缺乏充分的社会和制度嵌入的情况下,透明度是多么脆弱。尽管INAI在从政府获取信息方面表现出色,但暴露的滥用行为却没有伴随着更广泛的执法行动。教训:将公共透明度纳入更广泛的政策议程,特别是那些普遍与透明度的être理由相关的议程(例如,社会、行政、刑事司法)。虽然INAI确实为信息权的社会化做出了努力,但这些努力缺乏规模,而且来得太晚。教训:尽早让公民参与进来,使透明度与日常公民生活中解决问题的任务相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.30%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Governance provides a forum for the theoretical and practical discussion of executive politics, public policy, administration, and the organization of the state. Published in association with International Political Science Association''s Research Committee on the Structure & Organization of Government (SOG), it emphasizes peer-reviewed articles that take an international or comparative approach to public policy and administration. All papers, regardless of empirical focus, should have wider theoretical, comparative, or practical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信