Usefulness of Spleen Index and Alkaline Phosphatase Level for Predicting Post-Liver Biopsy Bleeding

IF 1.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70183
Hirohito Takeuchi, Katsutoshi Sugimoto, Tatsuya Kakegawa, Hiroshi Takahashi, Takuya Wada, Masakazu Abe, Yu Yoshimasu, Kazuharu Harada, Masataka Taguri, Takao Itoi
{"title":"Usefulness of Spleen Index and Alkaline Phosphatase Level for Predicting Post-Liver Biopsy Bleeding","authors":"Hirohito Takeuchi,&nbsp;Katsutoshi Sugimoto,&nbsp;Tatsuya Kakegawa,&nbsp;Hiroshi Takahashi,&nbsp;Takuya Wada,&nbsp;Masakazu Abe,&nbsp;Yu Yoshimasu,&nbsp;Kazuharu Harada,&nbsp;Masataka Taguri,&nbsp;Takao Itoi","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The significance of liver biopsy is increasing with an increase in chronic liver disease and gene panel testing. Although non-invasive methods such as elastography and biomarkers assess liver fibrosis, biopsy remains the definitive diagnostic gold standard. We evaluated the predictors of bleeding complications in liver biopsies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 697 patients were enrolled in this study between May 2017 and October 2022. We examined bleeding complications and procedures following liver biopsy and the liver biopsy needle size, blood test results, and spleen index to determine factors related to bleeding complications. Bleeding complications occurred in 23 patients (3.3%), including 20 cases at the liver puncture site, two instances of biliary bleeding, and one intercostal artery injury. The treatments varied and included hepatic arterial embolization (2 patients, 0.3%), blood transfusion therapy (3 patients, 0.4%), radiofrequency ablation (2 patients, 0.3%), endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (1 patient, 0.1%), and other treatments. In multivariate and ROC analyzes, a higher spleen index (Odds ratio: 1.13 [1.07–1.20], AUC: 0.74, optimal cut-off value: 16.2, sensitivity: 0.74, specificity: 0.64) and ALP level (Odds ratio: 1.00 [1.00–1.01], AUC: 0.71, optimal cut-off value: 94.5, sensitivity: 0.83, specificity: 0.49) were associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Other significant factors influencing bleeding included age, PT-INR, needle size, and Child–Pugh score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The identified risk factors included spleen index and ALP level, particularly in relation to bleeding complications during liver biopsy. Therefore, these predictors should be considered before performing a liver biopsy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.70183","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

The significance of liver biopsy is increasing with an increase in chronic liver disease and gene panel testing. Although non-invasive methods such as elastography and biomarkers assess liver fibrosis, biopsy remains the definitive diagnostic gold standard. We evaluated the predictors of bleeding complications in liver biopsies.

Methods and Results

A total of 697 patients were enrolled in this study between May 2017 and October 2022. We examined bleeding complications and procedures following liver biopsy and the liver biopsy needle size, blood test results, and spleen index to determine factors related to bleeding complications. Bleeding complications occurred in 23 patients (3.3%), including 20 cases at the liver puncture site, two instances of biliary bleeding, and one intercostal artery injury. The treatments varied and included hepatic arterial embolization (2 patients, 0.3%), blood transfusion therapy (3 patients, 0.4%), radiofrequency ablation (2 patients, 0.3%), endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (1 patient, 0.1%), and other treatments. In multivariate and ROC analyzes, a higher spleen index (Odds ratio: 1.13 [1.07–1.20], AUC: 0.74, optimal cut-off value: 16.2, sensitivity: 0.74, specificity: 0.64) and ALP level (Odds ratio: 1.00 [1.00–1.01], AUC: 0.71, optimal cut-off value: 94.5, sensitivity: 0.83, specificity: 0.49) were associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Other significant factors influencing bleeding included age, PT-INR, needle size, and Child–Pugh score.

Conclusions

The identified risk factors included spleen index and ALP level, particularly in relation to bleeding complications during liver biopsy. Therefore, these predictors should be considered before performing a liver biopsy.

脾指数和碱性磷酸酶水平预测肝活检后出血的价值
目的肝活检的意义随着慢性肝病和基因面板检测的增加而增加。虽然非侵入性方法,如弹性成像和生物标志物评估肝纤维化,活检仍然是明确的诊断金标准。我们评估了肝活检中出血并发症的预测因素。方法与结果在2017年5月至2022年10月期间,共有697名患者入组。我们检查了肝活检后的出血并发症和手术,以及肝活检针的大小、血液检查结果和脾脏指数,以确定出血并发症的相关因素。出血并发症23例(3.3%),其中肝穿刺部位20例,胆道出血2例,肋间动脉损伤1例。治疗方法多种多样,包括肝动脉栓塞(2例,0.3%)、输血治疗(3例,0.4%)、射频消融(2例,0.3%)、内镜鼻胆道引流(1例,0.1%)等治疗。在多因素和ROC分析中,脾脏指数(比值比:1.13 [1.07-1.20],AUC: 0.74,最佳临界值:16.2,敏感性:0.74,特异性:0.64)和ALP水平(比值比:1.00 [1.00 - 1.01],AUC: 0.71,最佳临界值:94.5,敏感性:0.83,特异性:0.49)升高与出血风险增加相关。其他影响出血的重要因素包括年龄、PT-INR、针头大小和Child-Pugh评分。结论确定的危险因素包括脾脏指数和ALP水平,特别是与肝活检时出血并发症有关。因此,在进行肝活检之前应考虑这些预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信