From the p-Factor to Cognitive Content: Detection and Discrimination of Psychopathologies Based on Explainable Artificial Intelligence

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Erkan Eyrikaya, İhsan Dağ
{"title":"From the p-Factor to Cognitive Content: Detection and Discrimination of Psychopathologies Based on Explainable Artificial Intelligence","authors":"Erkan Eyrikaya,&nbsp;İhsan Dağ","doi":"10.1155/da/9943590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background and Aims:</b> Differentiating psychopathologies is challenging due to shared underlying mechanisms, such as the <i>p</i>-factor. Nevertheless, recent methodological advances suggest that distinct linguistic markers can help detect and differentiate these conditions. This study aimed to use cognitive content analysis with advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) to (Study 1) distinguish among control, depression, anxiety, and depressive-anxiety groups and (Study 2) detect general psychopathology.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Data from 1901 participants (retained from 2551 respondents aged 18–43 years who completed the Beier sentence completion test [BSCT]) were analyzed. For Study 1, groups were formed using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21); negative mood was assessed via the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). For Study 2, the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) categorized general psychopathology and self-reported diagnostic status served as external validation. Two analytic approaches were employed: (1) textual analysis with a bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) model and (2) subscale-score analysis using a support vector machine (SVM). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpreted the ML models.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> In Study 1, the models distinguished control, depression, anxiety, and depressive-anxiety groups. Anxiety was marked by positive content, hope, and I-Talk, whereas depression involved negative, hopeless content. Depressive-anxiety combined features of anxiety with a pronounced negative outlook, suggesting a transitional phase where diminishing hope may bridge anxiety to depression. In Study 2, the models performed high in distinguishing the self-reported pathology diagnosis group (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.81 [BERT], 0.85 [SVM]) from subclinical samples but failed to differentiate the self-reported past diagnosis (AUC: 0.53 [BERT], 0.57 [SVM]) group from controls. This implies that cognitive changes in psychopathology may share a consistent underlying structure like <i>p</i>-factor.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> These pioneer findings demonstrate that integrating advanced computational techniques can identify key linguistic markers and guide the development of language-based diagnostic tools, potentially transforming mental health diagnostics.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/9943590","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/9943590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: Differentiating psychopathologies is challenging due to shared underlying mechanisms, such as the p-factor. Nevertheless, recent methodological advances suggest that distinct linguistic markers can help detect and differentiate these conditions. This study aimed to use cognitive content analysis with advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) to (Study 1) distinguish among control, depression, anxiety, and depressive-anxiety groups and (Study 2) detect general psychopathology.

Methods: Data from 1901 participants (retained from 2551 respondents aged 18–43 years who completed the Beier sentence completion test [BSCT]) were analyzed. For Study 1, groups were formed using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21); negative mood was assessed via the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). For Study 2, the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) categorized general psychopathology and self-reported diagnostic status served as external validation. Two analytic approaches were employed: (1) textual analysis with a bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) model and (2) subscale-score analysis using a support vector machine (SVM). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpreted the ML models.

Results: In Study 1, the models distinguished control, depression, anxiety, and depressive-anxiety groups. Anxiety was marked by positive content, hope, and I-Talk, whereas depression involved negative, hopeless content. Depressive-anxiety combined features of anxiety with a pronounced negative outlook, suggesting a transitional phase where diminishing hope may bridge anxiety to depression. In Study 2, the models performed high in distinguishing the self-reported pathology diagnosis group (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.81 [BERT], 0.85 [SVM]) from subclinical samples but failed to differentiate the self-reported past diagnosis (AUC: 0.53 [BERT], 0.57 [SVM]) group from controls. This implies that cognitive changes in psychopathology may share a consistent underlying structure like p-factor.

Conclusion: These pioneer findings demonstrate that integrating advanced computational techniques can identify key linguistic markers and guide the development of language-based diagnostic tools, potentially transforming mental health diagnostics.

从p因子到认知内容:基于可解释人工智能的精神病理检测与鉴别
背景和目的:由于共同的潜在机制,如p因子,区分精神病理是具有挑战性的。然而,最近的方法进步表明,不同的语言标记可以帮助检测和区分这些情况。本研究旨在利用高级自然语言处理(NLP)和机器学习(ML)的认知内容分析(研究1)区分对照组、抑郁组、焦虑组和抑郁-焦虑组,并(研究2)检测一般精神病理。方法:对1901名参与者(从2551名年龄在18-43岁之间完成贝尔句子补全测试[BSCT]的受访者中留存)的数据进行分析。在研究1中,采用抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21)分组;通过积极和消极情绪量表(PANAS)评估消极情绪。在研究2中,简要症状量表(BSI)分类的一般精神病理和自我报告的诊断状态作为外部验证。本文采用了两种分析方法:(1)基于双向编码器的文本分析(BERT)模型;(2)基于支持向量机(SVM)的子尺度评分分析。SHapley加性解释(SHAP)解释ML模型。结果:在研究1中,模型区分了对照组、抑郁组、焦虑组和抑郁-焦虑组。焦虑的特征是积极的内容、希望和I-Talk,而抑郁的特征是消极的、无望的内容。抑郁-焦虑结合了焦虑的特征和明显的消极前景,表明一个过渡阶段,希望的减少可能会把焦虑变成抑郁。在研究2中,模型在区分自我报告的病理诊断组(曲线下面积[AUC]: 0.81 [BERT], 0.85 [SVM])和亚临床样本方面表现良好,但在区分自我报告的过去诊断组(AUC: 0.53 [BERT], 0.57 [SVM])和对照组方面表现不佳。这意味着精神病理学中的认知变化可能具有一致的潜在结构,如p因子。结论:这些开创性的发现表明,整合先进的计算技术可以识别关键的语言标记,并指导基于语言的诊断工具的发展,有可能改变心理健康诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信