{"title":"From the p-Factor to Cognitive Content: Detection and Discrimination of Psychopathologies Based on Explainable Artificial Intelligence","authors":"Erkan Eyrikaya, İhsan Dağ","doi":"10.1155/da/9943590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background and Aims:</b> Differentiating psychopathologies is challenging due to shared underlying mechanisms, such as the <i>p</i>-factor. Nevertheless, recent methodological advances suggest that distinct linguistic markers can help detect and differentiate these conditions. This study aimed to use cognitive content analysis with advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) to (Study 1) distinguish among control, depression, anxiety, and depressive-anxiety groups and (Study 2) detect general psychopathology.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Data from 1901 participants (retained from 2551 respondents aged 18–43 years who completed the Beier sentence completion test [BSCT]) were analyzed. For Study 1, groups were formed using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21); negative mood was assessed via the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). For Study 2, the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) categorized general psychopathology and self-reported diagnostic status served as external validation. Two analytic approaches were employed: (1) textual analysis with a bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) model and (2) subscale-score analysis using a support vector machine (SVM). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpreted the ML models.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> In Study 1, the models distinguished control, depression, anxiety, and depressive-anxiety groups. Anxiety was marked by positive content, hope, and I-Talk, whereas depression involved negative, hopeless content. Depressive-anxiety combined features of anxiety with a pronounced negative outlook, suggesting a transitional phase where diminishing hope may bridge anxiety to depression. In Study 2, the models performed high in distinguishing the self-reported pathology diagnosis group (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.81 [BERT], 0.85 [SVM]) from subclinical samples but failed to differentiate the self-reported past diagnosis (AUC: 0.53 [BERT], 0.57 [SVM]) group from controls. This implies that cognitive changes in psychopathology may share a consistent underlying structure like <i>p</i>-factor.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> These pioneer findings demonstrate that integrating advanced computational techniques can identify key linguistic markers and guide the development of language-based diagnostic tools, potentially transforming mental health diagnostics.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/9943590","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/9943590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Aims: Differentiating psychopathologies is challenging due to shared underlying mechanisms, such as the p-factor. Nevertheless, recent methodological advances suggest that distinct linguistic markers can help detect and differentiate these conditions. This study aimed to use cognitive content analysis with advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) to (Study 1) distinguish among control, depression, anxiety, and depressive-anxiety groups and (Study 2) detect general psychopathology.
Methods: Data from 1901 participants (retained from 2551 respondents aged 18–43 years who completed the Beier sentence completion test [BSCT]) were analyzed. For Study 1, groups were formed using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21); negative mood was assessed via the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). For Study 2, the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) categorized general psychopathology and self-reported diagnostic status served as external validation. Two analytic approaches were employed: (1) textual analysis with a bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) model and (2) subscale-score analysis using a support vector machine (SVM). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpreted the ML models.
Results: In Study 1, the models distinguished control, depression, anxiety, and depressive-anxiety groups. Anxiety was marked by positive content, hope, and I-Talk, whereas depression involved negative, hopeless content. Depressive-anxiety combined features of anxiety with a pronounced negative outlook, suggesting a transitional phase where diminishing hope may bridge anxiety to depression. In Study 2, the models performed high in distinguishing the self-reported pathology diagnosis group (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.81 [BERT], 0.85 [SVM]) from subclinical samples but failed to differentiate the self-reported past diagnosis (AUC: 0.53 [BERT], 0.57 [SVM]) group from controls. This implies that cognitive changes in psychopathology may share a consistent underlying structure like p-factor.
Conclusion: These pioneer findings demonstrate that integrating advanced computational techniques can identify key linguistic markers and guide the development of language-based diagnostic tools, potentially transforming mental health diagnostics.
期刊介绍:
Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.