Inclusion

IF 0.6 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Grecia L. Perez
{"title":"Inclusion","authors":"Grecia L. Perez","doi":"10.1111/napa.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Economic inclusion is generally regarded as a desirable goal for historically marginalized communities, but a critical reading of this goal raises important questions: who is included and/or excluded? And what are the power relations that structure decisions about the form of inclusivity in any economic development process? In this essay, I reflect on my community-engaged research with Just San Bernardino (Just SB), a coalition of nine community-based and union organizations that formed in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic to redefine initiatives toward genuine forms of economic inclusion. This research documented long-standing community frustrations and mismatched understandings of priorities among communities, grant-making organizations, and governmental agencies. The research led Just SB to develop a <i>People's Plan for an Inclusive Economy</i> and a companion <i>People's Dictionary</i> to lay the groundwork for a shared understanding of key terms and their goals. Reflecting on this grassroots research process, I suggest that economic inclusion has no monolithic definition, but rather must be grounded in multiple social worldviews if we are to generate meaningful change.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.70006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Economic inclusion is generally regarded as a desirable goal for historically marginalized communities, but a critical reading of this goal raises important questions: who is included and/or excluded? And what are the power relations that structure decisions about the form of inclusivity in any economic development process? In this essay, I reflect on my community-engaged research with Just San Bernardino (Just SB), a coalition of nine community-based and union organizations that formed in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic to redefine initiatives toward genuine forms of economic inclusion. This research documented long-standing community frustrations and mismatched understandings of priorities among communities, grant-making organizations, and governmental agencies. The research led Just SB to develop a People's Plan for an Inclusive Economy and a companion People's Dictionary to lay the groundwork for a shared understanding of key terms and their goals. Reflecting on this grassroots research process, I suggest that economic inclusion has no monolithic definition, but rather must be grounded in multiple social worldviews if we are to generate meaningful change.

包容
经济包容通常被认为是历史上边缘化社区的理想目标,但对这一目标的批判性解读提出了重要问题:谁被包括在内和/或被排除在外?在任何经济发展过程中,决定包容性形式的权力关系是什么?在这篇文章中,我回顾了我与Just San Bernardino (Just SB)的社区参与研究。Just SB是一个由9个社区和工会组织组成的联盟,在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后成立,旨在重新定义实现真正形式的经济包容的举措。这项研究记录了长期存在的社区挫折,以及社区、资助组织和政府机构之间对优先级的不匹配理解。这项研究促使Just SB制定了包容性经济的人民计划和配套的人民词典,为共同理解关键术语及其目标奠定了基础。反思这一基层研究过程,我认为,如果我们要产生有意义的变革,经济包容性没有单一的定义,而是必须建立在多种社会世界观的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信