Diego Herrero-Alonso, Natividad Fuertes-Prieto, Antonio Tarriño, David Cuenca-Solana, Asier García-Escárzaga, Jorge Calvo-Gómez, Igor Gutiérrez-Zugasti
{"title":"Changes in lithic raw material and technological management during the Mesolithic: a view from El Mazo (Northern Iberia)","authors":"Diego Herrero-Alonso, Natividad Fuertes-Prieto, Antonio Tarriño, David Cuenca-Solana, Asier García-Escárzaga, Jorge Calvo-Gómez, Igor Gutiérrez-Zugasti","doi":"10.1007/s12520-025-02225-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the lithic industry at the Mesolithic shell midden site of El Mazo (Andrín, Asturias), on the Asturian coastline in Northern Iberia, focusing on resource management, production strategies, and mobility patterns of the last hunter-gatherer-fishers. El Mazo provides a unique opportunity to examine lithic resource use across the Early-Middle Holocene transition, with a particular emphasis on the dynamic of the 8.2 ka climate event. Raw material analysis reveals that most lithic resources originated locally (< 30 km), although some were transported from distances exceeding 250 km, indicating extensive mobility and exchange networks. Technological trends (bladelet production) and typological changes in microliths (backed points and geometric forms) across the extensive stratigraphy connect this sequence to broader Mesolithic developments in both Iberian and European contexts. The occurrence of trapezoids and microburins at the base of the stratigraphic sequence links this assemblage to the European Second Mesolithic and the Iberian Geometric Mesolithic. The 8.2 ka event stands out as a pivotal period marked by increased mobility and intensified long-distance contacts, influencing both raw material procurement and armature typology. However, post-8000 cal BP stratigraphic units indicate a narrowing of lithic resource acquisition ranges, alongside the introduction of new geometric forms such as triangles and a novel retouch technique (“double bevel”). This highlights diachronic changes around 8000 cal BP that align with broader Iberian trends. These findings challenge traditional conceptions of the Asturian culture as isolated; instead revealing complex adaptive strategies, dynamic territorial organization, and extensive connectivity among Mesolithic groups in northern Iberia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12520-025-02225-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02225-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the lithic industry at the Mesolithic shell midden site of El Mazo (Andrín, Asturias), on the Asturian coastline in Northern Iberia, focusing on resource management, production strategies, and mobility patterns of the last hunter-gatherer-fishers. El Mazo provides a unique opportunity to examine lithic resource use across the Early-Middle Holocene transition, with a particular emphasis on the dynamic of the 8.2 ka climate event. Raw material analysis reveals that most lithic resources originated locally (< 30 km), although some were transported from distances exceeding 250 km, indicating extensive mobility and exchange networks. Technological trends (bladelet production) and typological changes in microliths (backed points and geometric forms) across the extensive stratigraphy connect this sequence to broader Mesolithic developments in both Iberian and European contexts. The occurrence of trapezoids and microburins at the base of the stratigraphic sequence links this assemblage to the European Second Mesolithic and the Iberian Geometric Mesolithic. The 8.2 ka event stands out as a pivotal period marked by increased mobility and intensified long-distance contacts, influencing both raw material procurement and armature typology. However, post-8000 cal BP stratigraphic units indicate a narrowing of lithic resource acquisition ranges, alongside the introduction of new geometric forms such as triangles and a novel retouch technique (“double bevel”). This highlights diachronic changes around 8000 cal BP that align with broader Iberian trends. These findings challenge traditional conceptions of the Asturian culture as isolated; instead revealing complex adaptive strategies, dynamic territorial organization, and extensive connectivity among Mesolithic groups in northern Iberia.
本研究调查了伊比利亚北部阿斯图里亚斯海岸线上El Mazo (Andrín,阿斯图里亚斯)中石器时代贝壳中心遗址的石器工业,重点关注资源管理、生产策略和最后的狩猎-采集-渔民的流动模式。El Mazo提供了一个独特的机会来研究早-中全新世过渡时期的岩石资源利用,特别强调8.2 ka气候事件的动态。原材料分析显示,大多数岩石资源起源于当地(30公里),尽管有些是从超过250公里的距离运输的,表明广泛的流动性和交换网络。在广泛的地层中,技术趋势(叶片生产)和微岩的类型变化(背点和几何形式)将这一序列与伊比利亚和欧洲背景下更广泛的中石器时代发展联系起来。地层层序底部出现的梯形和微纹将这一组合与欧洲第二中石器时代和伊比利亚几何中石器时代联系起来。8.2 ka事件是一个关键时期,其特点是流动性增加和长距离接触加强,影响了原材料采购和电枢类型。然而,8000 cal BP之后的地层单元表明,随着新的几何形式(如三角形)和新的修饰技术(“双斜面”)的引入,岩石资源获取范围缩小。这突出了距今8000万年左右的历时性变化,与更广泛的伊比利亚趋势一致。这些发现挑战了阿斯图里亚斯文化是孤立的传统观念;而是揭示了伊比利亚北部中石器时代群体之间复杂的适应策略、动态的领土组织和广泛的联系。
期刊介绍:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research.
Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science.
The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).