Citizen-led initiatives and hydro-meteorological risks reduction: Who is implementing nature-based solutions?

Yaw Agyeman Boafo , Kirk B. Enu , Kofi Dua Agyei , Jude Dokbila Kolog
{"title":"Citizen-led initiatives and hydro-meteorological risks reduction: Who is implementing nature-based solutions?","authors":"Yaw Agyeman Boafo ,&nbsp;Kirk B. Enu ,&nbsp;Kofi Dua Agyei ,&nbsp;Jude Dokbila Kolog","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Citizen-led initiatives are crucial in mitigating hydro-meteorological hazards such as floods, extreme heat, and drought, as they complement state-led efforts and fill gaps where institutional responses fall short, especially in developing regions. As advocacy for Nature-based Solutions (NbS) grows—valued for their efficacy, cost-effectiveness, simplicity, and multifunctionality—there is an urgent need to understand how citizens are adopting these measures to inform strategies for scaling NbS uptake. This study surveyed 1286 respondents across the dense Greater Accra Metropolitan Area (GAMA) and the rapidly growing Greater Kumasi Metropolitan Area (GKMA) in Ghana to map citizen-led initiatives and identify factors influencing NbS adoption using a multinomial logit model. The results show that GAMA residents predominantly rely on non-structural measures, such as temporary relocation and water conservation, reflecting spatial constraints and dense urban form. In contrast, GKMA residents favor structural measures, particularly NbS, including tree planting, rainwater harvesting, and home gardens. Demographic and household factors significantly influenced NbS uptake. Younger individuals, those with technical education, and larger households were more likely to adopt NbS. Older individuals and those with higher education levels often preferred conventional or reactive strategies. Prior hazard experiences increased the likelihood of NbS adoption; however, more severe experiences tend to shift preferences toward immediate non-structural or conventional measures, highlighting perceptions of the time-intensive nature of NbS effectiveness. The findings advocate for integrating NbS into urban planning frameworks, supported by policies that incentivize citizen-led initiatives and address spatial and financial barriers. Furthermore, underutilized local knowledge and widely adopted non-structural strategies offer complementary pathways to enhance NbS adoption and foster more inclusive and sustainable urban resilience. This study provides actionable insights for promoting NbS in rapidly urbanizing cities of the Global South.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411525000230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Citizen-led initiatives are crucial in mitigating hydro-meteorological hazards such as floods, extreme heat, and drought, as they complement state-led efforts and fill gaps where institutional responses fall short, especially in developing regions. As advocacy for Nature-based Solutions (NbS) grows—valued for their efficacy, cost-effectiveness, simplicity, and multifunctionality—there is an urgent need to understand how citizens are adopting these measures to inform strategies for scaling NbS uptake. This study surveyed 1286 respondents across the dense Greater Accra Metropolitan Area (GAMA) and the rapidly growing Greater Kumasi Metropolitan Area (GKMA) in Ghana to map citizen-led initiatives and identify factors influencing NbS adoption using a multinomial logit model. The results show that GAMA residents predominantly rely on non-structural measures, such as temporary relocation and water conservation, reflecting spatial constraints and dense urban form. In contrast, GKMA residents favor structural measures, particularly NbS, including tree planting, rainwater harvesting, and home gardens. Demographic and household factors significantly influenced NbS uptake. Younger individuals, those with technical education, and larger households were more likely to adopt NbS. Older individuals and those with higher education levels often preferred conventional or reactive strategies. Prior hazard experiences increased the likelihood of NbS adoption; however, more severe experiences tend to shift preferences toward immediate non-structural or conventional measures, highlighting perceptions of the time-intensive nature of NbS effectiveness. The findings advocate for integrating NbS into urban planning frameworks, supported by policies that incentivize citizen-led initiatives and address spatial and financial barriers. Furthermore, underutilized local knowledge and widely adopted non-structural strategies offer complementary pathways to enhance NbS adoption and foster more inclusive and sustainable urban resilience. This study provides actionable insights for promoting NbS in rapidly urbanizing cities of the Global South.
公民主导的倡议和减少水文气象风险:谁在实施基于自然的解决方案?
公民主导的倡议对于减轻洪水、极端高温和干旱等水文气象灾害至关重要,因为它们补充了国家主导的努力,填补了机构应对不足的空白,特别是在发展中地区。基于自然的解决方案(NbS)因其有效性、成本效益、简单性和多功能而受到重视,随着对其的倡导不断增长,迫切需要了解公民如何采用这些措施来为扩大NbS的采用提供信息。本研究调查了加纳人口密集的大阿克拉都会区(GAMA)和快速增长的大库马西都会区(GKMA)的1286名受访者,以绘制公民主导的倡议,并使用多项逻辑模型确定影响国家统计局采用的因素。结果表明,GAMA居民主要依靠临时搬迁和节水等非结构性措施,反映了空间约束和密集的城市形态。相比之下,GKMA居民倾向于结构性措施,特别是NbS,包括植树、雨水收集和家庭花园。人口和家庭因素对国家统计局的吸收有显著影响。年轻人、受过技术教育的人和大家庭更有可能采用国家统计局。老年人和受教育程度较高的人通常更喜欢传统的或被动的策略。先前的危险经历增加了采用NbS的可能性;然而,更严重的经验倾向于将偏好转向直接的非结构性或传统措施,突出了国家统计局有效性的时间密集性。研究结果主张将国家统计局纳入城市规划框架,并辅以鼓励公民主导的倡议和解决空间和财务障碍的政策。此外,未充分利用的地方知识和广泛采用的非结构性战略为提高国家统计局的采用和培养更具包容性和可持续的城市韧性提供了互补途径。本研究为在全球南方快速城市化的城市推广国家统计局提供了可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信