Information-seeking behavior about multiple stressors for roadside forest management

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Emlyn R.H. Crocker, Anita T. Morzillo
{"title":"Information-seeking behavior about multiple stressors for roadside forest management","authors":"Emlyn R.H. Crocker,&nbsp;Anita T. Morzillo","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The combination of diverse land uses and multiple biophysical stressors brings complexity to forest management, particularly along roadways. Managers and landowners may seek information and resources to address property-level challenges that occur in such contexts. However, little is known about information-seeking behavior among professionals in the forest management community. Our objective was to examine knowledge transfer within the context of information-seeking behavior of forest management professionals in Connecticut (United States) in relation to addressing multiple forest stressors and roadside forest management. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 39 stakeholders in the Connecticut professional forest management community. Interview topics included participant and land type characteristics, management objectives, forest stressors and impacts, and information-seeking behavior. Results of qualitative analysis supported a conceptual framework that presented information seeking as an iterative feedback loop influenced by information needs, sources, availability, and utility. Participants sought and validated information from both tacit and explicit sources across multiple spatial scales. Information about forest conditions and stressor-related impacts applicable to the local context were of particular interest. All participants sought knowledge from colleagues, but some felt that their own expertise was undervalued. Knowledge transfer may be enhanced through co-production of knowledge and investment in boundary spanning individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 128865"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725001992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The combination of diverse land uses and multiple biophysical stressors brings complexity to forest management, particularly along roadways. Managers and landowners may seek information and resources to address property-level challenges that occur in such contexts. However, little is known about information-seeking behavior among professionals in the forest management community. Our objective was to examine knowledge transfer within the context of information-seeking behavior of forest management professionals in Connecticut (United States) in relation to addressing multiple forest stressors and roadside forest management. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 39 stakeholders in the Connecticut professional forest management community. Interview topics included participant and land type characteristics, management objectives, forest stressors and impacts, and information-seeking behavior. Results of qualitative analysis supported a conceptual framework that presented information seeking as an iterative feedback loop influenced by information needs, sources, availability, and utility. Participants sought and validated information from both tacit and explicit sources across multiple spatial scales. Information about forest conditions and stressor-related impacts applicable to the local context were of particular interest. All participants sought knowledge from colleagues, but some felt that their own expertise was undervalued. Knowledge transfer may be enhanced through co-production of knowledge and investment in boundary spanning individuals.
路边森林管理中多重压力源的信息寻求行为
多样化的土地利用和多种生物物理压力因素相结合,给森林管理带来了复杂性,特别是公路沿线。管理者和土地所有者可能会寻求信息和资源来解决在这种情况下发生的财产层面的挑战。然而,对森林管理界专业人员的信息寻求行为知之甚少。我们的目标是在康涅狄格州(美国)森林管理专业人员寻求信息行为的背景下,研究与解决多种森林压力源和路边森林管理有关的知识转移。与康涅狄格州专业森林管理社区的39名利益相关者完成了半结构化访谈。访谈主题包括参与者和土地类型特征、管理目标、森林压力源和影响以及信息寻求行为。定性分析的结果支持了一个概念框架,该框架将信息寻求视为一个受信息需求、来源、可用性和效用影响的迭代反馈循环。参与者从多个空间尺度的隐性和显性来源中寻找和验证信息。特别令人感兴趣的是关于森林条件和适用于当地情况的与压力有关的影响的资料。所有参与者都向同事寻求知识,但有些人觉得自己的专业知识被低估了。知识的共同生产和对跨界个体的投资可以促进知识转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信