The causal neural substrates underpinning prospective and retrospective sense of agency

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Amber Pryke , Krishnapriya Jayachandran , Andrew K. Martin
{"title":"The causal neural substrates underpinning prospective and retrospective sense of agency","authors":"Amber Pryke ,&nbsp;Krishnapriya Jayachandran ,&nbsp;Andrew K. Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2025.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sense of agency (SoA) is the subjective feeling of authorship experienced over one’s actions and their subsequent sensory outcomes. Despite extensive theoretical accounts of this experience, there remains a dearth of literature investigating its causal neural substrates. To address this, we modulated neural activity of two regions thought to be critical to the agentic experience, namely the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-dlPFC), and the left temporoparietal junction (l-TPJ). In a sham-controlled, double-blinded, crossover study 104 healthy young adults were stratified to receive anodal stimulation to either the l-dlPFC or the l-TPJ whilst completing an implicit SoA task. Participants performed either an action or outcome binding paradigm in which both prospective (action choice) and retrospective (outcome valence) agency cues were manipulated. Stimulation to the l-TPJ and l-dlPFC produced divergent effects on intentional binding. In the outcome binding condition specifically, anodal stimulation to either target region increased the difference in intentional binding scores between rewarding and punishing action outcomes. We also observed a dissociable, causal role for both the l-dlPFC and l-TPJ on intentional binding, identifying binding specific, but not site specific, effects related to outcome valence. We propose that excitatory stimulation may upregulate the attentional processes relevant to intentional binding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"188 ","pages":"Pages 53-67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945225001194","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sense of agency (SoA) is the subjective feeling of authorship experienced over one’s actions and their subsequent sensory outcomes. Despite extensive theoretical accounts of this experience, there remains a dearth of literature investigating its causal neural substrates. To address this, we modulated neural activity of two regions thought to be critical to the agentic experience, namely the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-dlPFC), and the left temporoparietal junction (l-TPJ). In a sham-controlled, double-blinded, crossover study 104 healthy young adults were stratified to receive anodal stimulation to either the l-dlPFC or the l-TPJ whilst completing an implicit SoA task. Participants performed either an action or outcome binding paradigm in which both prospective (action choice) and retrospective (outcome valence) agency cues were manipulated. Stimulation to the l-TPJ and l-dlPFC produced divergent effects on intentional binding. In the outcome binding condition specifically, anodal stimulation to either target region increased the difference in intentional binding scores between rewarding and punishing action outcomes. We also observed a dissociable, causal role for both the l-dlPFC and l-TPJ on intentional binding, identifying binding specific, but not site specific, effects related to outcome valence. We propose that excitatory stimulation may upregulate the attentional processes relevant to intentional binding.
支持前瞻性和回顾性代理感的因果神经基质
代理感(SoA)是对一个人的行为及其随后的感官结果所经历的主观感觉。尽管广泛的理论帐户的这一经验,仍然缺乏文献调查其因果神经基质。为了解决这个问题,我们调节了被认为对代理体验至关重要的两个区域的神经活动,即左背外侧前额叶皮层(l-dlPFC)和左颞顶叶交界处(l-TPJ)。在一项假对照、双盲、交叉研究中,104名健康的年轻人被分层,在完成隐式SoA任务的同时接受l-dlPFC或l-TPJ的阳极刺激。参与者执行了一个行动或结果约束范式,其中前瞻性(行动选择)和回顾性(结果效价)代理线索都被操纵。刺激l-TPJ和l-dlPFC对有意结合产生不同的影响。具体来说,在结果绑定条件下,对任何一个目标区域的阳极刺激都增加了奖惩行为结果之间的意向绑定分数的差异。我们还观察到l-dlPFC和l-TPJ在有意结合中具有可解离的因果作用,确定了与结果效价相关的结合特异性(而非位点特异性)效应。我们提出,兴奋性刺激可能上调与意向结合相关的注意过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信