Compaction of a sandy loam soil not impacted by long-term biosolids applications

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Navdeep Singh , Markus Flury , Haly Neely , Andy Bary , Idil Akin , Gabriel T. LaHue
{"title":"Compaction of a sandy loam soil not impacted by long-term biosolids applications","authors":"Navdeep Singh ,&nbsp;Markus Flury ,&nbsp;Haly Neely ,&nbsp;Andy Bary ,&nbsp;Idil Akin ,&nbsp;Gabriel T. LaHue","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil compaction and soil organic matter (SOM) are critical factors influencing crop growth and soil health, yet their interaction and impact on plant-available water (PAW) remain underexplored. To address this, we investigated a 26-year field experiment on fine sandy loam soil in Washington State, USA, involving three biosolids application rates (0, 4.7, and 10.0 Mg ha⁻¹) applied every four years in a winter wheat-fallow rotation. Compacted and uncompacted strips were created using field-traffic, with additional intact soil cores from uncompacted strips compacted in the laboratory. Intact cores from uncompacted, field-compacted and lab-compacted treatments were analyzed for saturated hydraulic conductivity (<em>K</em><sub>sat</sub>), soil moisture release curves, and bulk density (ρ<sub>b</sub>). The change in ρ<sub>b</sub> after compaction (Δρ<sub>b</sub>) and rebound (Δε) were assessed for lab-compacted cores. Disturbed soil samples were analyzed for Proctor maximum bulk density (ρ<sub>bmax</sub>), critical water content (CWC), and contact angle (α). Biosolids application generally reduced ρ<sub>b</sub> and ρ<sub>bmax</sub>, increased CWC, volumetric water content at saturation (θ<sub>SAT</sub>), <em>K</em><sub>sat</sub>, and α but did not affect volumetric water content at field capacity (θ<sub>FC</sub>), permanent wilting point (θ<sub>PWP</sub>), or PAW. Compaction reduced θ<sub>SAT</sub> and <em>K</em><sub>sat</sub> while increasing ρ<sub>b</sub>, θ<sub>FC</sub>, θ<sub>PWP</sub>, and PAW. While compaction impacted soil physical and hydraulic properties, biosolids had limited effects under the study conditions. Contrary to our expectations, no interaction between biosolids application and compaction treatments was observed. Despite numerous benefits of increased SOM with biosolids application, increased resistance to and recovery from soil compaction does not appear to be one of them in this study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 106648"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil compaction and soil organic matter (SOM) are critical factors influencing crop growth and soil health, yet their interaction and impact on plant-available water (PAW) remain underexplored. To address this, we investigated a 26-year field experiment on fine sandy loam soil in Washington State, USA, involving three biosolids application rates (0, 4.7, and 10.0 Mg ha⁻¹) applied every four years in a winter wheat-fallow rotation. Compacted and uncompacted strips were created using field-traffic, with additional intact soil cores from uncompacted strips compacted in the laboratory. Intact cores from uncompacted, field-compacted and lab-compacted treatments were analyzed for saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), soil moisture release curves, and bulk density (ρb). The change in ρb after compaction (Δρb) and rebound (Δε) were assessed for lab-compacted cores. Disturbed soil samples were analyzed for Proctor maximum bulk density (ρbmax), critical water content (CWC), and contact angle (α). Biosolids application generally reduced ρb and ρbmax, increased CWC, volumetric water content at saturation (θSAT), Ksat, and α but did not affect volumetric water content at field capacity (θFC), permanent wilting point (θPWP), or PAW. Compaction reduced θSAT and Ksat while increasing ρb, θFC, θPWP, and PAW. While compaction impacted soil physical and hydraulic properties, biosolids had limited effects under the study conditions. Contrary to our expectations, no interaction between biosolids application and compaction treatments was observed. Despite numerous benefits of increased SOM with biosolids application, increased resistance to and recovery from soil compaction does not appear to be one of them in this study.
不受长期生物固体施用影响的砂壤土的压实
土壤压实和土壤有机质(SOM)是影响作物生长和土壤健康的关键因子,但它们之间的相互作用及其对植物有效水分(PAW)的影响尚未得到充分研究。为了解决这个问题,我们在美国华盛顿州的细砂壤土上进行了为期26年的田间试验,涉及三种生物固体施用量(0、4.7和10.0 Mg ha⁻¹),每四年在冬小麦-休耕轮作中施用一次。通过现场交通创建了压实和非压实条带,并在实验室压实了未压实条带的额外完整土芯。分析了未压实、现场压实和实验室压实处理的完整岩心的饱和水力导率(Ksat)、土壤水分释放曲线和容重(ρb)。对实验室压实岩心的压实后ρb的变化(Δρb)和回弹(Δε)进行了评价。分析扰动土样品的Proctor最大容重(ρbmax)、临界含水量(CWC)和接触角(α)。施用生物固体通常降低了ρb和ρbmax,增加了CWC,饱和时体积含水量(θSAT), Ksat和α,但不影响现场容量时体积含水量(θFC),永久凋萎点(θPWP)或PAW。压实降低了θSAT和Ksat,增加了ρb、θFC、θPWP和PAW。压实会影响土壤的物理和水力特性,而生物固体在研究条件下的影响有限。与我们的预期相反,没有观察到生物固体应用和压实处理之间的相互作用。尽管使用生物固体增加SOM有许多好处,但在本研究中,增加对土壤压实的抵抗力和恢复能力似乎并不是其中之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信