Local government debt governance and carbon emissions in China

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Qingying Zheng , Wenjie Hao , Boqiang Lin
{"title":"Local government debt governance and carbon emissions in China","authors":"Qingying Zheng ,&nbsp;Wenjie Hao ,&nbsp;Boqiang Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The implicit debt risks arising from the unregulated expansion of financing platforms can easily lead to incentive distortions, causing local governments to engage in non-green behaviors. Using data from 284 prefecture-level cities between 2010 and 2021, and considering the new Budget Law's implementation in 2015 as a natural experiment, this paper employs a difference-in-differences model to investigate the carbon emission reduction effects of local government debt governance. The results indicate that the reform significantly reduced regional carbon emission intensity through two main channels: mitigating extensive land competition and reducing resource allocation distortion. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the carbon emission reduction effects are more pronounced in regions with greater fiscal pressure. Additionally, the study finds that the reform creates a co-governance benefit between carbon dioxide and other pollutants, with only the issuance of revenue bonds showing significant carbon emission reduction effects. The findings of this study provide important policy implications for synergizing government debt risk resolution with the achievement of “dual carbon” goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 107991"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019592552500188X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implicit debt risks arising from the unregulated expansion of financing platforms can easily lead to incentive distortions, causing local governments to engage in non-green behaviors. Using data from 284 prefecture-level cities between 2010 and 2021, and considering the new Budget Law's implementation in 2015 as a natural experiment, this paper employs a difference-in-differences model to investigate the carbon emission reduction effects of local government debt governance. The results indicate that the reform significantly reduced regional carbon emission intensity through two main channels: mitigating extensive land competition and reducing resource allocation distortion. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the carbon emission reduction effects are more pronounced in regions with greater fiscal pressure. Additionally, the study finds that the reform creates a co-governance benefit between carbon dioxide and other pollutants, with only the issuance of revenue bonds showing significant carbon emission reduction effects. The findings of this study provide important policy implications for synergizing government debt risk resolution with the achievement of “dual carbon” goals.
中国地方政府债务治理与碳排放
融资平台不受监管的扩张所带来的隐性债务风险很容易导致激励扭曲,导致地方政府从事非绿色行为。本文利用2010 - 2021年284个地级市的数据,并将2015年新预算法的实施作为自然实验,采用“差中差”模型考察地方政府债务治理的碳减排效果。结果表明,改革通过缓解土地粗放型竞争和减少资源配置扭曲两个主要渠道显著降低了区域碳排放强度。异质性分析表明,财政压力越大的地区碳减排效果越明显。此外,研究发现,改革在二氧化碳和其他污染物之间产生了共同治理效益,只有发行税收债券才显示出显著的碳减排效果。本研究结果为政府债务风险解决与实现“双碳”目标的协同作用提供了重要的政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信