{"title":"Data-driven collaborative safety evaluation for seepage reliability of embankments considering spatial variability","authors":"Bin Xu , Zichong Liu , Rui Pang , Yang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seepage safety analysis in real embankments considering hydraulic parameters’ spatial variability is crucial. However, random seepage analysis in embankments is often lack of efficiency and accuracy for evaluation of low failure incidents based on complex random fields and fine finite element models. To improve both analytical efficiency and accuracy, a data-driven collaborative safety evaluation framework that integrates the Optimized Linear Estimation Method (OLEM) with Refine Subset Simulation (RSS) has been proposed. Firstly, the random field of the uncertain parameters of the soil–water characteristic curve (SWCC) is efficiently discretized using OLEM based on the results of deterministic analysis, and a sensitivity analysis is performed accordingly. Then, considering various combinations of spatial variability degrees of hydraulic parameters, RSS is applied to the rough mesh model for random finite element analysis, while fine element cases are generated using the Response Conditioning Method (RCM) for further collaborative safety evaluation. Finally, the accuracy of the method is validated by comparing it with the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) based on the same 3D rough model, and the relevant seepage safety analysis is conducted. The findings reveal that the coefficient of variation (COV) and autocorrelation distance of the permeability coefficient <em>Ks</em> in the filling section significantly impact the dam’s seepage safety. Despite strong spatial variability in parameters, the probability of seepage failure remains below 10<sup>-3</sup>. The RSS method reduces computation time to 1/10 compared to MCS at a 10<sup>-3</sup> failure level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"660 ","pages":"Article 133490"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425008285","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Seepage safety analysis in real embankments considering hydraulic parameters’ spatial variability is crucial. However, random seepage analysis in embankments is often lack of efficiency and accuracy for evaluation of low failure incidents based on complex random fields and fine finite element models. To improve both analytical efficiency and accuracy, a data-driven collaborative safety evaluation framework that integrates the Optimized Linear Estimation Method (OLEM) with Refine Subset Simulation (RSS) has been proposed. Firstly, the random field of the uncertain parameters of the soil–water characteristic curve (SWCC) is efficiently discretized using OLEM based on the results of deterministic analysis, and a sensitivity analysis is performed accordingly. Then, considering various combinations of spatial variability degrees of hydraulic parameters, RSS is applied to the rough mesh model for random finite element analysis, while fine element cases are generated using the Response Conditioning Method (RCM) for further collaborative safety evaluation. Finally, the accuracy of the method is validated by comparing it with the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) based on the same 3D rough model, and the relevant seepage safety analysis is conducted. The findings reveal that the coefficient of variation (COV) and autocorrelation distance of the permeability coefficient Ks in the filling section significantly impact the dam’s seepage safety. Despite strong spatial variability in parameters, the probability of seepage failure remains below 10-3. The RSS method reduces computation time to 1/10 compared to MCS at a 10-3 failure level.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.