Effects of conventional and biodegradable microplastics at comparable environmental levels on pesticide degradation in soil

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Pengtao Chen , Furong Fu , Lixia Zhao , Xiaojing Li , Yang Sun , Zhenyan Fu , Liping Weng
{"title":"Effects of conventional and biodegradable microplastics at comparable environmental levels on pesticide degradation in soil","authors":"Pengtao Chen ,&nbsp;Furong Fu ,&nbsp;Lixia Zhao ,&nbsp;Xiaojing Li ,&nbsp;Yang Sun ,&nbsp;Zhenyan Fu ,&nbsp;Liping Weng","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The co-existence of microplastics (MPs) and pesticides in agricultural environments, especially under greenhouse conditions, is a common occurrence. However, there is limited information on how MPs affect pesticide degradation under comparable environmental concentrations. In this study, we conducted a laboratory experiment to evaluate the impact of two types of MPs—biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) and conventional polyethylene (PE)—on the degradation of 2 pesticides, metolachlor (MET) and imidacloprid (IMI), in soil at low (0.1 %) and high (1.0 %) concentrations. Over a 30-day period, we assessed pesticide degradation rates and metabolic products, along with soil properties and the aging status of MPs. Our results show that PLA reduced the degradation rate of IMI with concentration variability — 1 % PLA (<em>w</em>/w) significantly reduced the degradation rate of IMI by a 6.7 % decrease after 30 days compared to the treatment of CK, but had no effect on MET. In contrast, PE did not influence the degradation of either pesticide. PLA significantly inhibited IMI degradation by reducing the soil pH from 7.28 ± 0.01 to 7.12 ± 0.05, diminishing bacterial diversity, and altering the composition of soil bacterial communities. Furthermore, the accelerated degradation of PLA, compared to PE, resulted in the release of a greater quantity of microplastic particles, exacerbating its impact on soil microbial functions and IMI degradation efficiency. These findings suggest that biodegradable MPs, such as PLA, can hinder the degradation of the two pesticides, posing ecological risks to agricultural environments. Our results provide insights for developing policies to prevent and control farmland pollution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 106189"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325003270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The co-existence of microplastics (MPs) and pesticides in agricultural environments, especially under greenhouse conditions, is a common occurrence. However, there is limited information on how MPs affect pesticide degradation under comparable environmental concentrations. In this study, we conducted a laboratory experiment to evaluate the impact of two types of MPs—biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) and conventional polyethylene (PE)—on the degradation of 2 pesticides, metolachlor (MET) and imidacloprid (IMI), in soil at low (0.1 %) and high (1.0 %) concentrations. Over a 30-day period, we assessed pesticide degradation rates and metabolic products, along with soil properties and the aging status of MPs. Our results show that PLA reduced the degradation rate of IMI with concentration variability — 1 % PLA (w/w) significantly reduced the degradation rate of IMI by a 6.7 % decrease after 30 days compared to the treatment of CK, but had no effect on MET. In contrast, PE did not influence the degradation of either pesticide. PLA significantly inhibited IMI degradation by reducing the soil pH from 7.28 ± 0.01 to 7.12 ± 0.05, diminishing bacterial diversity, and altering the composition of soil bacterial communities. Furthermore, the accelerated degradation of PLA, compared to PE, resulted in the release of a greater quantity of microplastic particles, exacerbating its impact on soil microbial functions and IMI degradation efficiency. These findings suggest that biodegradable MPs, such as PLA, can hinder the degradation of the two pesticides, posing ecological risks to agricultural environments. Our results provide insights for developing policies to prevent and control farmland pollution.
环境水平相当的常规和可生物降解微塑料对土壤中农药降解的影响
微塑料(MPs)与农药在农业环境,特别是温室条件下共存是一种常见的现象。然而,在类似的环境浓度下,MPs如何影响农药降解的信息有限。在本研究中,我们进行了室内实验,评估了两种类型的mps -可生物降解聚乳酸(PLA)和常规聚乙烯(PE) -对土壤中低(0.1%)和高(1.0%)浓度的两种农药-异丙草胺(MET)和吡虫啉(IMI)的降解影响。在30天的时间里,我们评估了农药的降解率和代谢产物,以及土壤性质和MPs的老化状态。我们的研究结果表明,PLA降低了IMI的降解率,且具有浓度变异性——与CK处理相比,1% PLA (w/w)在30天后显著降低了IMI的降解率6.7%,但对MET没有影响。相比之下,PE对两种农药的降解均无影响。PLA通过将土壤pH值从7.28±0.01降低到7.12±0.05,降低细菌多样性,改变土壤细菌群落组成,显著抑制了IMI的降解。此外,与PE相比,PLA的加速降解导致其释放出更多的微塑料颗粒,加剧了其对土壤微生物功能和IMI降解效率的影响。这些发现表明,聚乳酸等可生物降解的MPs会阻碍这两种农药的降解,对农业环境构成生态风险。研究结果可为制定防治农田污染的政策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信