{"title":"Unified mental health and capacity law: Creating parity and non-discrimination?","authors":"Jill Stavert, Colin McKay","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2025.102108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It has been argued that a fusion of mental health and capacity law creates parity and respects non-discrimination. This approach has been adopted in the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016, although this legislation is not yet fully in force. Separately the World Health Organisation and the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities have advocated ending the separate status of mental health law. Across the rest of the UK, the possibility of fusion legislation has recently been considered, although not ultimately recommended in 2018 by the Independent Review of the Mental Health Act for England and Wales and in 2022 by the Scottish Mental Health Law Review. Challenges include potential conflicts with Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities' critique of ‘mental capacity’ and whether a capacity threshold is required for unified mental health and capacity law. This article will consider the approach of the Scottish Mental Health Law Review, why it did not recommend immediate fusion and its proposals for greater alignment of mental health and capacity regimes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016025272500041X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It has been argued that a fusion of mental health and capacity law creates parity and respects non-discrimination. This approach has been adopted in the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016, although this legislation is not yet fully in force. Separately the World Health Organisation and the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities have advocated ending the separate status of mental health law. Across the rest of the UK, the possibility of fusion legislation has recently been considered, although not ultimately recommended in 2018 by the Independent Review of the Mental Health Act for England and Wales and in 2022 by the Scottish Mental Health Law Review. Challenges include potential conflicts with Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities' critique of ‘mental capacity’ and whether a capacity threshold is required for unified mental health and capacity law. This article will consider the approach of the Scottish Mental Health Law Review, why it did not recommend immediate fusion and its proposals for greater alignment of mental health and capacity regimes.
有人认为,精神健康和行为能力法的融合创造了平等并尊重不歧视。2016年《精神能力法(北爱尔兰)》采用了这种方法,尽管这项立法尚未完全生效。另外,世界卫生组织(World Health organization)和残疾人权利委员会(Committee on Rights of Persons of Disabilities)主张结束精神卫生法的单独地位。在英国其他地区,最近已经考虑了融合立法的可能性,尽管2018年《英格兰和威尔士精神卫生法独立审查》和2022年《苏格兰精神卫生法审查》最终没有提出建议。挑战包括与《欧洲人权公约》第5条的潜在冲突,以及残疾人权利委员会对“精神能力”的批评,以及统一的精神健康和能力法是否需要一个能力门槛。本文将考虑苏格兰精神健康法律评论的方法,为什么它不建议立即融合及其建议更大程度上协调精神健康和能力制度。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.