Assessing the food circularity capabilities in European Union countries: Picture fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach

IF 4.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Gökçe Candan , Merve Cengiz Toklu
{"title":"Assessing the food circularity capabilities in European Union countries: Picture fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach","authors":"Gökçe Candan ,&nbsp;Merve Cengiz Toklu","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food circularity is crucial for meeting the primary needs of both current and future generations. Since food waste, which continues to increase today, cannot be prevented, it is vital to identify the countries’ food circularity capabilities. This study addresses a gap in the literature by evaluating the food circularity capabilities of European Union member countries. It is the first to determine the significance of criteria for assessing food circularity capabilities while also presenting and analytically discussing the performance levels of these countries. The importance levels of the criteria are determined using the Picture Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Subsequently, European Union member countries are ranked based on their food circularity capabilities using the Additive Ratio Assessment method. The results indicate that the most critical criteria are food waste and the recycling rate of municipal waste. Sweden, Malta, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Austria are the top five performing countries. In contrast, Greece, Romania, and Bulgaria rank among the least capable countries regarding food circularity. These findings can assist policymakers and researchers in gaining a deeper understanding of the food circularity capabilities of European Union member countries within the context of sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101241"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food circularity is crucial for meeting the primary needs of both current and future generations. Since food waste, which continues to increase today, cannot be prevented, it is vital to identify the countries’ food circularity capabilities. This study addresses a gap in the literature by evaluating the food circularity capabilities of European Union member countries. It is the first to determine the significance of criteria for assessing food circularity capabilities while also presenting and analytically discussing the performance levels of these countries. The importance levels of the criteria are determined using the Picture Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Subsequently, European Union member countries are ranked based on their food circularity capabilities using the Additive Ratio Assessment method. The results indicate that the most critical criteria are food waste and the recycling rate of municipal waste. Sweden, Malta, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Austria are the top five performing countries. In contrast, Greece, Romania, and Bulgaria rank among the least capable countries regarding food circularity. These findings can assist policymakers and researchers in gaining a deeper understanding of the food circularity capabilities of European Union member countries within the context of sustainable development.
评估食品循环能力在欧盟国家:图片模糊多标准决策方法
粮食循环对于满足当代人和子孙后代的基本需求至关重要。由于无法阻止今天继续增加的食物浪费,因此确定各国的食物循环能力至关重要。本研究通过评估欧盟成员国的食品循环能力来解决文献中的空白。这是第一次确定评估食品循环能力标准的重要性,同时也提出并分析讨论了这些国家的绩效水平。使用图像模糊层次分析法确定标准的重要程度。随后,使用添加剂比率评估方法对欧盟成员国的食品循环能力进行排名。结果表明,最关键的标准是食物垃圾和城市垃圾的回收率。瑞典、马耳他、荷兰、比利时和奥地利是表现最好的五个国家。相比之下,希腊、罗马尼亚和保加利亚在食品循环能力最差的国家之列。这些发现可以帮助决策者和研究人员更深入地了解可持续发展背景下欧盟成员国的食品循环能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Development
Environmental Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action. Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers. All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信