Practice-based research examining effectiveness of exposure-based CBT for youth in a community mental health setting

Emily M. Becker-Haimes , Michal Weiss , Temma Schaechter , Sophia Young , Amanda L. Sanchez
{"title":"Practice-based research examining effectiveness of exposure-based CBT for youth in a community mental health setting","authors":"Emily M. Becker-Haimes ,&nbsp;Michal Weiss ,&nbsp;Temma Schaechter ,&nbsp;Sophia Young ,&nbsp;Amanda L. Sanchez","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examined the naturalistic effectiveness of exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapy (Ex-CBT) for pediatric anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder in a community mental health setting. We also characterized adaptations made to Ex-CBT and whether treatment factors varied by whether youth were Medicaid recipients or not. To do so, we conducted a three-year, retrospective chart review of consecutively treated youth in an Ex-CBT treatment center embedded in a community mental health setting (<em>N</em> = 94; 72.3 % Medicaid recipients, 68.1 % female). We abstracted baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment techniques delivered, and treatment process and response variables to examine whether these varied as a function of Medicaid status and identify predictors of treatment response. Medicaid youth were more racially and linguistically diverse than non-Medicaid youth; there otherwise were no differences in baseline demographic and clinical variables. Ex-CBT was delivered in more than twice as many sessions compared to typical clinical trials. Coded session data indicated a more diverse suite of techniques delivered by clinicians not typically included in Ex-CBT protocols (e.g., case management, discussion of cultural and contextual factors) alongside Ex-CBT. Techniques employed by clinicians varied by insurance status. However, response rates were comparable to those seen in clinical trials (51–70 %, depending on response definition). Receiving a higher dose of exposure predicted greater likelihood of treatment response, as did younger age and male gender; Medicaid status and racial/ethnic minority status did not predict response. Overall, data supported Ex-CBT effectiveness in this setting. Ex-CBT was adapted in ways that differed based on whether youth were Medicaid recipients or not.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004425000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined the naturalistic effectiveness of exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapy (Ex-CBT) for pediatric anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder in a community mental health setting. We also characterized adaptations made to Ex-CBT and whether treatment factors varied by whether youth were Medicaid recipients or not. To do so, we conducted a three-year, retrospective chart review of consecutively treated youth in an Ex-CBT treatment center embedded in a community mental health setting (N = 94; 72.3 % Medicaid recipients, 68.1 % female). We abstracted baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment techniques delivered, and treatment process and response variables to examine whether these varied as a function of Medicaid status and identify predictors of treatment response. Medicaid youth were more racially and linguistically diverse than non-Medicaid youth; there otherwise were no differences in baseline demographic and clinical variables. Ex-CBT was delivered in more than twice as many sessions compared to typical clinical trials. Coded session data indicated a more diverse suite of techniques delivered by clinicians not typically included in Ex-CBT protocols (e.g., case management, discussion of cultural and contextual factors) alongside Ex-CBT. Techniques employed by clinicians varied by insurance status. However, response rates were comparable to those seen in clinical trials (51–70 %, depending on response definition). Receiving a higher dose of exposure predicted greater likelihood of treatment response, as did younger age and male gender; Medicaid status and racial/ethnic minority status did not predict response. Overall, data supported Ex-CBT effectiveness in this setting. Ex-CBT was adapted in ways that differed based on whether youth were Medicaid recipients or not.
以实践为基础的研究,检验以暴露为基础的认知行为治疗在社区心理健康环境中的青少年的有效性
我们在社区心理健康环境中研究了基于暴露的认知行为疗法(前cbt)治疗儿童焦虑和强迫症的自然效果。我们还描述了对前cbt的适应,以及治疗因素是否因青少年是否接受医疗补助而变化。为此,我们对在社区精神卫生机构内的前cbt治疗中心连续治疗的青少年进行了为期三年的回顾性图表回顾(N = 94;72.3 %医疗补助接受者,68.1% %女性)。我们提取了基线人口统计学和临床特征、提供的治疗技术、治疗过程和反应变量,以检验这些变量是否随着医疗补助状况的变化而变化,并确定治疗反应的预测因子。与非医疗补助青年相比,医疗补助青年在种族和语言上更加多样化;除此之外,基线人口统计学和临床变量没有差异。与典型的临床试验相比,前cbt治疗的疗程增加了两倍多。编码的会话数据表明,除了前cbt之外,临床医生还提供了一套更多样化的技术,这些技术通常不包括在前cbt协议中(例如,病例管理、文化和背景因素的讨论)。临床医生采用的技术因保险状况而异。然而,反应率与临床试验相当(51-70 %,取决于反应定义)。接受较高剂量的暴露预示着更大的治疗反应可能性,年龄较小和男性性别也是如此;医疗补助状况和种族/少数民族状况不能预测反应。总体而言,数据支持这种情况下的前cbt有效性。前认知行为疗法的适应方式因青少年是否接受医疗补助而有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信