Determinants of platelet transfusion practices in China: A nationwide survey on transfusionists’ preferences and barriers to whole blood-derived platelets adoption
Tie Cheng Sun , Yu Jie Wen , Ning Zhang , Di Wu , Wei Dong Zhang , Yan Jun Jia
{"title":"Determinants of platelet transfusion practices in China: A nationwide survey on transfusionists’ preferences and barriers to whole blood-derived platelets adoption","authors":"Tie Cheng Sun , Yu Jie Wen , Ning Zhang , Di Wu , Wei Dong Zhang , Yan Jun Jia","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2025.104156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite the potential of whole blood-derived platelets (WBDP) to mitigate platelet shortages, their underutilization persists globally. This study investigates the perceptions of transfusionists and identifies barriers to the adoption of WBDP within China's blood supply system for tertiary hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A structured questionnaire comprising 16 items was distributed through WeChat to 254 transfusionists working in tertiary hospitals across China. Data regarding demographics, platelet preferences, and operational challenges were analyzed using descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative responses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results indicated a strong preference for AP (95.28 %), primarily attributed to perceived safety (80.99 %), efficacy (75.21 %), and familiarity with its use (76.86 %). In contrast, WBDP adoption was impeded by concerns over transfusion reactions (85.04 %), safety uncertainties (77.20 %), and operational challenges, such as increased workload (74.41 %) and higher labor costs (50.39 %). Despite this, 90.19 % of respondents expressed willingness to use WBDP during AP shortages, primarily due to critical shortages (66.81 %) and institutional mandates (33.19 %). Moreover, the key barriers included the risk of transfusion reactions (85.04 %), uncertainties regarding safety (77.20 %), doubts about efficacy (57.48 %), and increased labor costs (50.39 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Institutional inertia favoring AP, along with operational costs and workload for transfusionists, limit WBDP utilization. Implementing centralized compatibility testing and subsidy policies could improve contingency preparedness and address operational challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":"64 3","pages":"Article 104156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147305022500093X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Despite the potential of whole blood-derived platelets (WBDP) to mitigate platelet shortages, their underutilization persists globally. This study investigates the perceptions of transfusionists and identifies barriers to the adoption of WBDP within China's blood supply system for tertiary hospitals.
Materials and methods
A structured questionnaire comprising 16 items was distributed through WeChat to 254 transfusionists working in tertiary hospitals across China. Data regarding demographics, platelet preferences, and operational challenges were analyzed using descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative responses.
Results
Results indicated a strong preference for AP (95.28 %), primarily attributed to perceived safety (80.99 %), efficacy (75.21 %), and familiarity with its use (76.86 %). In contrast, WBDP adoption was impeded by concerns over transfusion reactions (85.04 %), safety uncertainties (77.20 %), and operational challenges, such as increased workload (74.41 %) and higher labor costs (50.39 %). Despite this, 90.19 % of respondents expressed willingness to use WBDP during AP shortages, primarily due to critical shortages (66.81 %) and institutional mandates (33.19 %). Moreover, the key barriers included the risk of transfusion reactions (85.04 %), uncertainties regarding safety (77.20 %), doubts about efficacy (57.48 %), and increased labor costs (50.39 %).
Conclusion
Institutional inertia favoring AP, along with operational costs and workload for transfusionists, limit WBDP utilization. Implementing centralized compatibility testing and subsidy policies could improve contingency preparedness and address operational challenges.
期刊介绍:
Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues.
Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.